On Tuesday 14 October 2003 07:45, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I like keeping definitions is one place only. Avoids being > > out-of-sync. The recent commit messages on Ant-Contrib already show > > this happening for a project looked at by many pairs of eyes... > > But I for one haven't looked into antlib.xml, yet. I trust Peter to > know what he does better than I would 8-)
Mmm.. > > > Should be trivial to add a 'resource' attribute, no? > > <antlib> can contain <typedef> which in turn supports resource. This > should work right now, shouldn't it? Yes, This does work. However while I was testing this, I found a bug in the ant namespace support for typedefed add() introspection. Looks the 1.6 beta will need a little more testing... Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
