Re: [PROPOSAL] ant-junitlauncher watchdog customization

Hello Aleksei, That looks fine to me. I've merged it to our master branch. I've added your github profile name (Alex) to our contributors list. If you want to use a different name to be added, please let us know, I'll update accordingly. -Jaikiran On 30/04/21 2:06 pm, Aleksei Zotov wrote:

[PROPOSAL] ant-junitlauncher watchdog customization

Hi all, I've raised https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/147 PR for having an ability to customize a watchdog created for test execution. The PR description has all the details explained. Could you, please, have a look and let me know what you think. Thanks, Aleksei Zotov.

Re: Ivy - Proposal for reviving the project and moving towards a release

I was hit by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-1478 (updatesite resolver sets ext token to empty rather than jar); also, it seems illogical that jars directory in the cache contains jar.pack files, whereas the actual jar files are in jars_unpacked... anybody interested to discuss? Gintas

Re: Ivy - Proposal for reviving the project and moving towards a release

Is the version number agreed upon? For IvyDE builds think the latest version of Ivy is 2.5.0.alpha_20161213000915 Gintas 2016-12-15 17:53 GMT+01:00 Matt Sicker : > I'd definitely agree with the consistency principle. > > On 15 December 2016 at 01:38, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > > On 2016-12-14, M

Re: Ivy - Proposal for reviving the project and moving towards a release

I'd definitely agree with the consistency principle. On 15 December 2016 at 01:38, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2016-12-14, Matt Sicker wrote: > > > When it comes to version numbers, I'm more concerned about following > > semantic versioning than whether or not it's a major release. Bugfixes > > w

Re: Ivy - Proposal for reviving the project and moving towards a release

On 2016-12-14, Matt Sicker wrote: > When it comes to version numbers, I'm more concerned about following > semantic versioning than whether or not it's a major release. Bugfixes > warrant micro version updates, while new features warrant minor version > updates (and backward incompatible API chang

Re: Ivy - Proposal for reviving the project and moving towards a release

; > > > Jonathan Oulds > Snr. Software Engineer > McAfee > > > -Original Message- > From: J Pai [mailto:jai.forums2...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 4:11 AM > To: Ant Developers List ; Maarten Coene < > maarten_co...@yahoo.com> > Subjec

RE: Ivy - Proposal for reviving the project and moving towards a release

@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 4:11 AM To: Ant Developers List ; Maarten Coene Subject: Re: Ivy - Proposal for reviving the project and moving towards a release Maarten, thanks for volunteering to review the PRs. One of them has a test case. I will add a test for the other one.

Re: Ivy - Proposal for reviving the project and moving towards a release

;t have the time to look into it) to do a new release. > > Maarten > > Van: Jaikiran Pai > Aan: dev@ant.apache.org > Verzonden: zondag 11 december 15:22 2016 > Onderwerp: Ivy - Proposal for reviving the project and moving towards a release > > First off, I'

Re: Ivy - Proposal for reviving the project and moving towards a release

On 2016-12-12, Maarten Coene wrote: > We also have to find a release manager. I did it in the past when we > were on SVN, but I don't have enough GIT knowledge (and I don't have > the time to look into it) to do a new release. Maarten, is this

Re: Ivy - Proposal for reviving the project and moving towards a release

t.apache.org Verzonden: zondag 11 december 15:22 2016 Onderwerp: Ivy - Proposal for reviving the project and moving towards a release First off, I'm not an Ivy or Ant committer. The proposal that I make below for an Ivy release is based on what was discussed in a recent mail thread a

Re: Ivy - Proposal for reviving the project and moving towards a release

tory (again, PMCs). I'm also not a committer, but if you're >> > interested enough in maintaining Ivy, I'd guess that the PMCs may wish to >> > bring you on board to do so. >> > >> > >> > On 11 December 2016 at 08:22, Jaikiran Pa

Re: Ivy - Proposal for reviving the project and moving towards a release

t > > repository involved); and committing the artifacts to the release svn > > repository (again, PMCs). I'm also not a committer, but if you're > > interested enough in maintaining Ivy, I'd guess that the PMCs may wish to > > bring you on board to do so. &

Re: Ivy - Proposal for reviving the project and moving towards a release

committing the artifacts to the release svn > repository (again, PMCs). I'm also not a committer, but if you're > interested enough in maintaining Ivy, I'd guess that the PMCs may wish to > bring you on board to do so. > > > On 11 December 2016 at 08:22, Jaikiran

Re: Ivy - Proposal for reviving the project and moving towards a release

e svn repository (again, PMCs). I'm also not a committer, but if you're interested enough in maintaining Ivy, I'd guess that the PMCs may wish to bring you on board to do so. On 11 December 2016 at 08:22, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > First off, I'm not an Ivy or Ant committer. Th

Ivy - Proposal for reviving the project and moving towards a release

First off, I'm not an Ivy or Ant committer. The proposal that I make below for an Ivy release is based on what was discussed in a recent mail thread about the future of Ivy https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@ant.apache.org/msg45078.html. There was a suggestion that someone from comm

Re: Proposal: Make Xooki spoof TiddlyWiki to use TiddlyFox plugin?

Le 20 janv. 2014 à 17:23, Charles Duffy a écrit : > Howdy, all -- > > The release process for Ivy includes using Xooki to edit the documentation > before publication. > > Unfortunately, the code Xooki uses for saving updated files, borrowed from > an early TiddlyWiki release, is no longer supp

Re: Proposal: Make Xooki spoof TiddlyWiki to use TiddlyFox plugin?

Hello Charles, I am all for it if it makes editing the ivy documentation easier. +1 Antoine On Jan 20, 2014, at 11:23 AM, Charles Duffy wrote: > Howdy, all -- > > The release process for Ivy includes using Xooki to edit the documentation > before publication. > > Unfortunately, the code Xo

Proposal: Make Xooki spoof TiddlyWiki to use TiddlyFox plugin?

Howdy, all -- The release process for Ivy includes using Xooki to edit the documentation before publication. Unfortunately, the code Xooki uses for saving updated files, borrowed from an early TiddlyWiki release, is no longer supported on modern FireFox or Chrome -- and while HTML5 has its own fi

Re: [Proposal] Capture attributes in unknown namespaces

m of parallel logging output >> must be resolved ;-) >> >> Jan >> >> >-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >> >Von: jan.mate...@rzf.fin-nrw.de [mailto:jan.mate...@rzf.fin-nrw.de] >> >Gesendet: Freitag, 25. Juni 2010 12:46 >> >An: dev@ant.apac

Re: [Proposal] Capture attributes in unknown namespaces

. Juni 2010 12:46 > >An: dev@ant.apache.org > >Betreff: AW: [Proposal] Capture attributes in unknown namespaces > > > >Other point: we have an implementation in the sandbox > >https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/sandbox/parallelexecutor > > > >Maybe you cou

AW: [Proposal] Capture attributes in unknown namespaces

btw - when using parallel executors the problem of parallel logging output must be resolved ;-) Jan >-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Von: jan.mate...@rzf.fin-nrw.de [mailto:jan.mate...@rzf.fin-nrw.de] >Gesendet: Freitag, 25. Juni 2010 12:46 >An: dev@ant.apache.org >Betreff

AW: [Proposal] Capture attributes in unknown namespaces

23:12 >An: Ant Developers List >Betreff: Re: [Proposal] Capture attributes in unknown namespaces > >On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Danny Yates > wrote: >> What would be kind of cool would be that if the parser >encounters attributes >> in a namespace that it doesn&

Re: [Proposal] Capture attributes in unknown namespaces

On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Danny Yates wrote: > What would be kind of cool would be that if the parser encounters attributes > in a namespace that it doesn't recognise, then instead of ignoring them (as > it does now), it records them and makes them available through an API on the > Project

Re: [Proposal] Capture attributes in unknown namespaces

On Jun 24, 2010, at 3:04 PM, Danny Yates wrote: > Hmm... that's interesting. I hadn't discovered that before. It's not clear > to me what that does - it appears to manipulate the DOM somehow. > > Could you explain what it's for and how to use it and then I can see if it > will help me solve my c

Re: [Proposal] Capture attributes in unknown namespaces

Hmm... that's interesting. I hadn't discovered that before. It's not clear to me what that does - it appears to manipulate the DOM somehow. Could you explain what it's for and how to use it and then I can see if it will help me solve my current problem. Many thanks, Danny. On 24 June 2010 20:5

Re: [Proposal] Capture attributes in unknown namespaces

Like org.apache.tools.ant.Dynamic*NS? -Matt On Jun 24, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Danny Yates wrote: > Hi guys, > > Me again! > > I have some more functionality that I'm interested in, but I fear it may be > quite specific to my requirements, so I thought I'd run it past you all > before getting to wor

[Proposal] Capture attributes in unknown namespaces

Hi guys, Me again! I have some more functionality that I'm interested in, but I fear it may be quite specific to my requirements, so I thought I'd run it past you all before getting to work on it. I'm developing a custom executor which can execute targets in parallel, and as an extension of that

Re: [PROPOSAL] Release Compress Antlib 1.0

On 2010-02-11, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > The Antlib will require Ant 1.8.x and Commons Compress. Commons > Compress 1.0 is known to have some issues (in particular for the ar and > cpio classes) but I wouldn't want to wait for a new release of it since > there are enough open JIRA issues for it th

Re: [PROPOSAL] Release Compress Antlib 1.0

On 2010-02-11, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: > Adding a third question : in order to find out where > commons-compress.jar should be put in the project, I have just tried > to build the antlib from the command line. > It looks like the expected way of building is to put > commons-compress.jar on th

Re: [PROPOSAL] Release Compress Antlib 1.0

On 2010-02-11, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: > I have just done a svn checkout of the compress antlib. Nice. > I have 2 first questions : > - do we really want to run javac with the source and target options > set to 1.2 ? I see that commons-compress itself requires at least 1.4. No, 1.4 will b

Re: [PROPOSAL] Release Compress Antlib 1.0

Adding a third question : in order to find out where commons-compress.jar should be put in the project, I have just tried to build the antlib from the command line. It looks like the expected way of building is to put commons-compress.jar on the classpath before starting ant ? My guess is we wan

Re: [PROPOSAL] Release Compress Antlib 1.0

Hello Stefan, I have just done a svn checkout of the compress antlib. I have 2 first questions : - do we really want to run javac with the source and target options set to 1.2 ? I see that commons-compress itself requires at least 1.4. - what is the easiest way for lazy people [me for instan

[PROPOSAL] Release Compress Antlib 1.0

Hi all, I've tagged the current trunk of the compress antlib and plan to build a release from it and propose a vote. The Antlib will require Ant 1.8.x and Commons Compress. Commons Compress 1.0 is known to have some issues (in particular for the ar and cpio classes) but I wouldn't want to wait f

Re: Tentative 1.8.0 Release Proposal

On 2009-12-22, Steve Loughran wrote: > I'd better make sure all my funtest stuff is documented then, hadn't I If you want it as part of 1.8.0, yes, better hurry up. I have removed it from defaults.properties, BTW. Stefan - To

Re: Tentative 1.8.0 Release Proposal

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2009-12-18, Stefan Bodewig wrote: If I'd be the one to create the release, I'll need some help by Kev and/or Antoine to become able to compile the optional tasks with commercial dependencies. That being said, if Antoine wants to take things over, I'll happily let him

Re: Tentative 1.8.0 Release Proposal

resending a mail which was considered spam by the ezmlm program Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2009-12-18, Stefan Bodewig wrote: If I'd be the one to create the release, I'll need some help by Kev and/or Antoine to become able to compile the optional tasks with commercial dependencies. That be

Re: Tentative 1.8.0 Release Proposal

On 2009-12-18, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > If I'd be the one to create the release, I'll need some help by Kev > and/or Antoine to become able to compile the optional tasks with > commercial dependencies. That being said, if Antoine wants to take > things over, I'll happily let him do so. Even thou

Tentative 1.8.0 Release Proposal

When I first seriously thought about volunteering as 1.8.0 release manager it was late this summer and I thought I'd write a mail like this in September. Life interfered and there've been way more changes in trunk than I initially thought, so now its almost christmas. What I'd like to propose is

Re: IVYDE - Proposal to increase minimum supported Eclipse version to 3.4

On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:09:56 -0600, Jon Schneider wrote: >> A little warning seems to be good. "This is the last release for Eclipse > 3.3. With the next version Eclipse 3.4 or newer is required." > > > This "3.3-Release" without the visualizer - and maybe this year? > > Then after finishing th

Re: IVYDE - Proposal to increase minimum supported Eclipse version to 3.4

> A little warning seems to be good. "This is the last release for Eclipse 3.3. With the next version Eclipse 3.4 or newer is required." > This "3.3-Release" without the visualizer - and maybe this year? > Then after finishing the visualizer a release of the new version? I'd be happy to put tog

AW: IVYDE - Proposal to increase minimum supported Eclipse version to 3.4

ten_co...@yahoo.com] >Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Dezember 2009 17:07 >An: Ant Developers List >Betreff: Re: IVYDE - Proposal to increase minimum supported >Eclipse version to 3.4 > >Or maybe we should increase the minimum Eclipse version to 3.4 >after the next IvyDE release? &

Re: IVYDE - Proposal to increase minimum supported Eclipse version to 3.4

Developers List Sent: Thu, December 10, 2009 4:54:37 PM Subject: IVYDE - Proposal to increase minimum supported Eclipse version to 3.4 I propose to increase the minimum supported Eclipse version to 3.4 to incorporate the Ivy Resolve Visualizer, subject of IVYDE-208 [1], into the next release of IvyDE

IVYDE - Proposal to increase minimum supported Eclipse version to 3.4

I propose to increase the minimum supported Eclipse version to 3.4 to incorporate the Ivy Resolve Visualizer, subject of IVYDE-208 [1], into the next release of IvyDE. The Resolve Visualizer has a dependency on GEF Zest which requires 3.4+. The other alternative is to release the Visualizer as a

Re: Proposal directory in SVN

On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is the content of > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/proposal/ ? It doesn't > seem to have been updated since a long time. It used to hold competing proposals of what Ant2 was supposed to be (

Proposal directory in SVN

What is the content of http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/proposal/ ? It doesn't seem to have been updated since a long time. Gilles

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project ant-xdocs-proposal (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-xdocs-proposal has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project ant-xdocs-proposal (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-xdocs-proposal has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project ant-xdocs-proposal (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-xdocs-proposal has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project ant-xdocs-proposal (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-xdocs-proposal has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43330] - Proposal to hide password in AbstractCvsTask when showing failed command.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43330] - Proposal to hide password in AbstractCvsTask when showing failed command.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43330] New: - Proposal to hide password in AbstractCvsTask when showing failed command.

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43330 Summary: Proposal to hide password in AbstractCvsTask when showing failed command. Product: Ant Version: 1.7.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Pr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15388] - [PATCH][embed proposal] Add lenient mode and java functions to JXpath task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15388] - [PATCH][embed proposal] Add lenient mode and java functions to JXpath task

--- > Status|NEW > |RESOLVED > Resolution| > |WONTFIX > > > > > --- Additional Comments From > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-19 10:10 --- > The embed proposal is now obsolete, Matt'

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15388] - [PATCH][embed proposal] Add lenient mode and java functions to JXpath task

ONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-19 10:10 --- The embed proposal is now obsolete, Matt's brilliant property helper has provided an new and easy to use mechanism to do jexl. An antlib for this will be available soon. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project ant-xdocs-proposal (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-xdocs-proposal has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project ant-xdocs-proposal (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-xdocs-proposal has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project ant-xdocs-proposal (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-xdocs-proposal has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project ant-xdocs-proposal (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-xdocs-proposal has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project ant-xdocs-proposal (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-xdocs-proposal has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project ant-xdocs-proposal (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-xdocs-proposal has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project ant-xdocs-proposal (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-xdocs-proposal has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project ant-xdocs-proposal (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-xdocs-proposal has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project ant-xdocs-proposal (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-xdocs-proposal has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project ant-xdocs-proposal (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-xdocs-proposal has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project ant-xdocs-proposal (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-xdocs-proposal has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project ant-xdocs-proposal (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-xdocs-proposal has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project ant-xdocs-proposal (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-xdocs-proposal has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project ant-xdocs-proposal (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-xdocs-proposal has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project ant-xdocs-proposal (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-xdocs-proposal has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project ant-xdocs-proposal (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-xdocs-proposal has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project ant-xdocs-proposal (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-xdocs-proposal has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project ant-xdocs-proposal (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-xdocs-proposal has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project ant-xdocs-proposal (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-xdocs-proposal has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project ant-xdocs-proposal (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-xdocs-proposal has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project ant-xdocs-proposal (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-xdocs-proposal has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project ant-xdocs-proposal (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-xdocs-proposal has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32142] - [PROPOSAL, PATCH] External public entity and new system entity IDs.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15388] - [PATCH][embed proposal] Add lenient mode and java functions to JXpath task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32142] - [PROPOSAL, PATCH] External public entity and new system entity IDs.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15388] - [PATCH][embed proposal] Add lenient mode and java functions to JXpath task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32142] - [PROPOSAL, PATCH] External public entity and new system entity IDs.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15388] - [PATCH][embed proposal] Add lenient mode and java functions to JXpath task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32142] - [PROPOSAL, PATCH] External public entity and new system entity IDs.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15388] - [PATCH][embed proposal] Add lenient mode and java functions to JXpath task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32142] - [PROPOSAL, PATCH] External public entity and new system entity IDs.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15388] - [PATCH][embed proposal] Add lenient mode and java functions to JXpath task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [PROPOSAL] Release Plan .NET Antlib

Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi all, I propose the following plan, please comment. * copy all classes from Ant core's /taskdefs/optional/dotnet to the .NET Antlib, in particular put into .../ant/dotnet/compile +1 I'm not 100% sure that "compile" is the right place for and . yeah, sti

[PROPOSAL] Release Plan .NET Antlib

Hi all, I propose the following plan, please comment. * copy all classes from Ant core's /taskdefs/optional/dotnet to the .NET Antlib, in particular put into .../ant/dotnet/compile I'm not 100% sure that "compile" is the right place for and . * Add deprecation warnings to the .NET ta

svn commit: r416510 - in /ant/core/trunk: ./ lib/optional/ proposal/ant-site/anakia/ proposal/sandbox/antunit/ proposal/sandbox/dotnet/ proposal/sandbox/input/ proposal/sandbox/svn/ src/etc/testcases/

runk/lib/optional/.svnignore - copied unchanged from r416280, ant/core/trunk/lib/optional/.cvsignore ant/core/trunk/proposal/ant-site/anakia/.svnignore - copied unchanged from r416241, ant/core/trunk/proposal/ant-site/anakia/.cvsignore ant/core/trunk/proposal/sandbox/antunit/.svnig

Re: svn commit: r379303 - /ant/core/trunk/proposal/embed/src/java/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/TaskDiscovery.java

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I assume that gump has switched JDK version recently to make this break Yes, (finally) switched to JDK 1.5 since JUnit 4.0 now is CVS HEAD and requires annotation support at compile time. Aah. I was wondering what fixed

Re: svn commit: r379303 - /ant/core/trunk/proposal/embed/src/java/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/TaskDiscovery.java

On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I assume that gump has switched JDK version recently to make this > break Yes, (finally) switched to JDK 1.5 since JUnit 4.0 now is CVS HEAD and requires annotation support at compile time. Stefan

svn commit: r379303 - /ant/core/trunk/proposal/embed/src/java/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/TaskDiscovery.java

Author: kevj Date: Mon Feb 20 17:09:54 2006 New Revision: 379303 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=379303&view=rev Log: fix gump build - I assume that gump has switched JDK version recently to make this break Modified: ant/core/trunk/proposal/embed/src/java/org/apache/tools

svn commit: r354101 - in /ant/core/trunk: proposal/xdocs/src/org/apache/ant/xdoclet/TaskTagsHandler.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/CommandlineJava.java

Author: jkf Date: Mon Dec 5 09:13:07 2005 New Revision: 354101 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=354101&view=rev Log: PR 3 Performance improvements by Dave Brosius Modified: ant/core/trunk/proposal/xdocs/src/org/apache/ant/xdoclet/TaskTagsHandler.java ant/core/trunk/src/

cvs commit: ant/proposal/xdocs/dvsl task.dvsl

stevel 2005/08/23 07:47:19 Modified:proposal/xdocs/dvsl task.dvsl Log: update date Revision ChangesPath 1.9 +1 -1 ant/proposal/xdocs/dvsl/task.dvsl Index: task.dvsl === RCS file: /home

cvs commit: ant/proposal/sandbox/antunit/src/testcases/org/apache/ant/antlib/antunit AssertTest.java

bodewig 2005/04/14 04:16:55 Added: proposal/sandbox/antunit .cvsignore build.xml proposal/sandbox/antunit/src/etc/testcases assert.xml proposal/sandbox/antunit/src/main/org/apache/ant/antlib/antunit AssertTask.java

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project ant-xdocs-proposal (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project ant-xdocs-proposal has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

cvs commit: ant/proposal/sandbox/antunit/src/main/org/apache/ant - New directory

bodewig 2005/04/14 02:41:41 ant/proposal/sandbox/antunit/src/main/org/apache/ant - New directory - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

cvs commit: ant/proposal/sandbox/antunit/src/main/org/apache/ant/antlib/antunit - New directory

bodewig 2005/04/14 02:41:53 ant/proposal/sandbox/antunit/src/main/org/apache/ant/antlib/antunit - New directory - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  1   2   3   4   5   >