Re: Authors tag

Peter Reilly wrote: I have commited the removal of authors patch. I made a CONTRIBUTORS file at the top level containing the authors names - without corresponding e-mail addresses. I suppose it's too late for a -1 on removing the @author tags based on the board recommendation... Well, all I can

Re: Authors tag

Thanks, googleing for "slo" was not too successful... Peter Steve Loughran wrote: Peter Reilly wrote: I have commited the removal of authors patch. I made a CONTRIBUTORS file at the top level containing the authors names - without corresponding e-mail addresses. The following name/e-mails I could

Re: Authors tag

Thanks, Peter Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 09 Mar 2004, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: gg at grtmail dot com Gautam Guliani (used to be in Get.java before you removed it 8-) miha at softhome dot net Couldn't find anything but Miha. Mail him/her? skanthak at muehlheim d

Re: Authors tag

On Tue, 09 Mar 2004, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > gg at grtmail dot com Gautam Guliani (used to be in Get.java before you removed it 8-) > miha at softhome dot net Couldn't find anything but Miha. Mail him/her? > skanthak at muehlheim dot de Sebastian Kanthak

Re: Authors tag

Peter Reilly wrote: I have commited the removal of authors patch. I made a CONTRIBUTORS file at the top level containing the authors names - without corresponding e-mail addresses. The following name/e-mails I could not find names for: slo that is me. Its my unix/nt login ID and what intellij wou

Re: Authors tag

my bugzilla login... riznob at hotmail dot com. -Rob A -Original Message- From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 9:40 AM To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: Authors tag I have commited the removal of authors patch. I made a CONTRIBUTORS file at the top

RE: Authors tag

age- > From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 9:40 AM > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: Re: Authors tag > > > I have commited the removal of authors patch. > I made a CONTRIBUTORS file at the top level containing the > authors names

Re: Authors tag

Peter Reilly wrote: I have commited the removal of authors patch. I made a CONTRIBUTORS file at the top level containing the authors names - without corresponding e-mail addresses. The following name/e-mails I could not find names for: gg at grtmail dot com miha at softhome dot net rhanderson skant

Re: Authors tag

I have commited the removal of authors patch. I made a CONTRIBUTORS file at the top level containing the authors names - without corresponding e-mail addresses. The following name/e-mails I could not find names for: gg at grtmail dot com miha at softhome dot net rhanderson skanthak at muehlheim dot

Re: Authors tag

On Wed, 03 Mar 2004, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I feel like a vandal, but should we do this now? +1 > using > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27177 > for the list of commiters I haven't checked that list myself, but I'll assume it is rather complete. We may wan

Re: Authors tag

I feel like a vandal, but should we do this now? using http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27177 for the list of commiters Peter Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We need to decide how we handle the author tags issue in the Ant pro

Re: Authors tag

On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We need to decide how we handle the author tags issue in the Ant > project. We need a mechanism to credit people's contributions > appropriately. The board suggests a CHANGES file. My preference > would be to create a CONTRIBUTORS fi

Re: Authors tag

Jack J. Woehr wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just noticed this in "ASF Board Summary for February 18, 2004" When's the IPO? What means IPO? Initial Public Offering when a private entity becomes a public corporation. I was teasing you all about the increasing legalism pervading Apache. It's alre

Re: Authors tag

On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Conor MacNeill wrote: > We need to decide how we handle the author tags issue in the Ant project. > We need a mechanism to credit people's contributions appropriately. The > board suggests a CHANGES file. My preference would be to create a > CONTRIBUTORS file listing names

Re: Authors tag

Conor MacNeill wrote: We need to decide how we handle the author tags issue in the Ant project. We need a mechanism to credit people's contributions appropriately. The board suggests a CHANGES file. My preference would be to create a CONTRIBUTORS file listing names only, due to worms and spam (

RE: Authors tag

> We need to decide how we handle the author tags issue in the > Ant project. > We need a mechanism to credit people's contributions > appropriately. The > board suggests a CHANGES file. My preference would be to create a > CONTRIBUTORS file listing names only, due to worms and spam (an > int

Re: Authors tag

On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 00:25:25 -0700, Jack J. Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Just noticed this in "ASF Board Summary for February 18, 2004" > When's the IPO? What means IPO? Initial Public Offering when a private entity becomes a public corporation. I was teasing you

RE: Authors tag

> > What means IPO? > > Initial Public Offering when a private entity becomes a > public corporation. > I was teasing you all about the increasing legalism pervading Apache. > It's already got Theo de Raadt swearing he's going to pull Apache > out of the OpenBSD source tree. Thanks, Jack.

Re: Authors tag

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Just noticed this in "ASF Board Summary for February 18, 2004" > > > When's the IPO? > > What means IPO? Initial Public Offering when a private entity becomes a public corporation. I was teasing you all about the increasing legalism pervading Apache. It's already go

RE: Authors tag

> > Just noticed this in "ASF Board Summary for February 18, 2004" > > > > - author tags are officially discouraged. these create > difficulties in > > establishing the proper ownership and the protection of our > > committers. there are other social issues dealing with > collaborative

Re: Authors tag

Peter Reilly wrote: > Just noticed this in "ASF Board Summary for February 18, 2004" > > - author tags are officially discouraged. these create difficulties in > establishing the proper ownership and the protection of our > committers. there are other social issues dealing with collabora

Re: Authors tag

--- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matt Benson wrote: > > >> - author tags are officially discouraged. these > >> > >I noticed this too. Could we change the checkstyle > >config to allow only whitespace as the @author > >parameter as a relatively safe starting point, > > > I have

Re: Authors tag

Matt Benson wrote: --- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just noticed this in "ASF Board Summary for February 18, 2004" - author tags are officially discouraged. these I noticed this too. Could we change the checkstyle config to allow only whitespace as the @author parameter as a re

Re: Authors tag

--- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just noticed this in "ASF Board Summary for February > 18, 2004" > > - author tags are officially discouraged. these I noticed this too. Could we change the checkstyle config to allow only whitespace as the @author parameter as a relatively safe st

Authors tag

Just noticed this in "ASF Board Summary for February 18, 2004" - author tags are officially discouraged. these create difficulties in establishing the proper ownership and the protection of our committers. there are other social issues dealing with collaborative development, but the Board