> From: Martijn Kruithof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I also like core best, but maybe it isn't such a good idea indeed.
Let's just forget about org.apache.ant.core... --DD
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 20. April 2005 11:09
> An: Ant Developers List
> Betreff: Re: Antlib package names
>
> Dominique Devienne wrote:
>
> >>From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>for the svn tasks I've used
>
rto Fernandez wrote:
We could use org.apache.ant.kernel :-)
Isn't it the same thing?
JA
-Original Message-
From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 April 2005 16:24
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: RE: Antlib package names
From: Phil Weighill-Smith [mailt
Dominique Devienne wrote:
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
for the svn tasks I've used org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.svn, for the
"newer" antunit I've used org.apache.ant.antlibs.antunit.
I'd like to drop the "tools" for antlibs and I think antlibs should be
somewhere in the package n
> From: Phil Weighill-Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Use of "core" as a package/directory name is mildly off
in
> a UNIX environment as the directory might be confused with a core
dump!
> ;n)
>
> Phil :n)
It would be a directory instead of a file though, so it wouldn't be
mistaken for long.
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> We shouldnt plan the name only for the svn-package.
> That´s a general question for future extensions.
>
> > Von: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Perhaps it could be just "org.apache.ant.svn" - i.e. drop antlibs.
Actually, Peter
rs List
Cc:
Subject: RE: Antlib package names
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> We shouldnt plan the name only for the svn-package.
> That´s a general question for future extensions.
>
> > Von: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Perhaps
We could use org.apache.ant.kernel :-)
Isn't it the same thing?
JA
> -Original Message-
> From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 20 April 2005 16:24
> To: Ant Developers List
> Subject: RE: Antlib package names
>
>
> > From: Ph
Dominique Devienne wrote:
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
for the svn tasks I've used org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.svn, for the
"newer" antunit I've used org.apache.ant.antlibs.antunit.
I'd like to drop the "tools" for antlibs and I think antlibs should be
somewhere in the package n
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> for the svn tasks I've used org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.svn, for the
> "newer" antunit I've used org.apache.ant.antlibs.antunit.
>
> I'd like to drop the "tools" for antlibs and I think antlibs should be
> somewhere in the package names, so I
e.
Jan
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet am: Dienstag, 19. April 2005 17:40
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Antlib package names
>
> Hi,
>
> for the svn tasks I've used org.apac
Hi,
for the svn tasks I've used org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.svn, for the
"newer" antunit I've used org.apache.ant.antlibs.antunit.
I'd like to drop the "tools" for antlibs and I think antlibs should be
somewhere in the package names, so I'd turn the former into
org.apache.ant.antlibs.svn.
Any
12 matches
Mail list logo
