On 2010-05-31, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> in <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/sandbox/usertests/>[1] you'll
> find a simple command line tool that compares env variables between Ant
> 1.8.1's code base and System.getenv.
This has further been simplified, just download
I've opened Bugzilla Issue 49366 to track this and related issues.
On 2010-05-31, Maarten Coene wrote:
> If the difference would be a problem, maybe we could ignore the
> environment variables starting with '=' on windows?
I'm not sure the difference itself would be a problem. Environment
varia
On 2010-06-01, Xavier Hanin wrote:
> I got no problem and no difference on my Mac:
Thank you for checking. I forgot to say so but the same is true for
Linux (at least the Ubuntu/OpenJDK combination I've tried) and Solaris.
> env $ java -version
> java version "1.6.0_17"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime En
1] you'll
> find a simple command line tool that compares env variables between Ant
> 1.8.1's code base and System.getenv.
>
> In order to try it go to the env subdir and run "ant antlib" folowed by
> "java -jar build/lib/ant-usertests.env-0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar" t
These are used for
* Windows drive current directory (e.g. "=C:=C:\WINNT") or the
* exit code of the last command (e.g. "=ExitCode=001").
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Maarten Coene
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Mon, May 31, 2010 9:55:33 PM
Subjec
When doing the same test with JDK1.5, I also get the "Only in 1.8.2:
=ExitCode=" difference.
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Maarten Coene
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Mon, May 31, 2010 9:55:33 PM
Subject: Re: System.getenv vs Ant 1.8.1's Execute
> Al
> Also, on my Windows7 system there are differences: System.getenv returns
> two or three additional env vars (depending on whether I run under
> Cygwin or not):
> Only in 1.8.2: =::=::\
> Only in 1.8.2: =C:=C:\OSS\ant-usertests\env
> Only in 1.8.2: =ExitCode=
Same here on Windows Vista
Hi,
in <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/sandbox/usertests/>[1] you'll
find a simple command line tool that compares env variables between Ant
1.8.1's code base and System.getenv.
In order to try it go to the env subdir and run "ant antlib" folowed by
"java -
1.8.1 by me (without any proxy)
Jan
>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>Von: Maarten Coene [mailto:maarten_co...@yahoo.com]
>Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Mai 2010 13:29
>An: Ant Developers List
>Betreff: Re: [ANN] release of Apache Ant 1.8.1
>
>Maybe it is caused by the pro
Maybe it is caused by the proxy server, but
http://ant.apache.org/manual/index.html still points to the 1.8.0 documentation?
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Antoine Levy-Lambert
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Sat, May 8, 2010 1:15:23 AM
Subject: [ANN] release of Apache Ant 1.8.1
Hi,
I have just seen that there is some inconsistency in the upload of ant 1.8.1 in
the maven2 repository, the jars have been uploaded to new directories [1] but
the maven-metadata.xml files have not been updated [2].
I have reported this to the repository team on a parallel email and will
You welcome,
the whole Ant team did a great work to fix the bugs found in Ant 1.8.0.
Especially thanks to Stefan, Matt, Jesse, Martijn, Jan.
Regards,
Antoine
Bruce Atherton wrote:
> Ditto. Great work, Antoine.
>
> On 08/05/2010 3:44 AM, Kevin Jackson wrote:
>> Hi sorry I didn't even get chance
Ditto. Great work, Antoine.
On 08/05/2010 3:44 AM, Kevin Jackson wrote:
Hi sorry I didn't even get chance to download and test this release this time :(
Good work on getting a point release done so quickly
Kev
-
To unsubscrib
Hi sorry I didn't even get chance to download and test this release this time :(
Good work on getting a point release done so quickly
Kev
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Hi,
on behalf of the Ant development team, I have the pleasure to announce
the release of Apache Ant 1.8.1.
Key features of the 1.8.1 release are
* new task augment allows to add attributes or nested elements to
previously defined references
* numerous bug fixes and improvements as
Hi,
we got 5 binding +1s ant two non binding +1s so the vote to release ant
1.8.1 passes.
I have just switched the web site to announce the release and uploaded
the build artifacts to their proper locations for the ant web site and
for maven.
I will make proper release announcements
to warn
> about what was almost always a mistake. This is analogous to the warning
> printed when you neglect to set a source level and Ant defaults to the
> version of the executing JDK.
>
>> (not too sure if this was added in ant 1.8 or ant 1.8.1)
>
> 1.8.0.
>
>
>
t was almost always a mistake. This is analogous to the warning printed when you
neglect to set a source level and Ant defaults to the version of the executing JDK.
(not too sure if this was added in ant 1.8 or ant 1.8.1)
1.8.0.
--
ok, scratch that, the warning happens for ant 1.8.0 as well :-(
So +1 for the 1.8.1 release.
Peter
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Peter Reilly
wrote:
> I am not too sure that I like the warning:
>
> /home/preilly/scm/svn/nft-trunk/build.xml:61: warning:
> 'includeantrun
was added in ant 1.8 or ant 1.8.1)
Peter
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Jean-Louis Boudart
wrote:
> +1 no issue here with easyant
>
> Regards,
>
> 2010/5/1 Antoine Levy-Lambert
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have uploaded a candidate for ant 1.8.1 under
&
+1 no issue here with easyant
Regards,
2010/5/1 Antoine Levy-Lambert
> Hi,
>
> I have uploaded a candidate for ant 1.8.1 under
> http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantoine/dist/>
>
> Also a label ANT_181 has been created in the reposit
On 4-5-2010 14:53, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2010-05-01, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Vote to release this build as ant 1.8.1
[X] Yes
[ ] No
+1 martijn
No problems observed
-
To
Maarten Coene wrote:
I did had one minor regression when running the Ivy junit tests where the test
summary is printed twice
I think I have seen the topmost stack trace element before the failure
duplicated, but not sure.
-
, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0,858 sec
I don't think this should block the release though, so here is my vote:
+1
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Antoine Levy-Lambert
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Sat, May 1, 2010 6:41:46 AM
Subject: [VOTE] release of ant 1.8.1
Hi,
I have uploa
+1
I see no issues here with the fairly complex build I manage.
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2010-05-01, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
>
> > Vote to release this build as ant 1.8.1
>
> > [X] Yes
>
>
On 2010-05-01, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
> Vote to release this build as ant 1.8.1
> [X] Yes
> [ ] No
+1
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-ma
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Vote to release this build as ant 1.8.1
[X] Yes
Have not found any issues with it yet. Plan to bundle it in NetBeans IDE 6.9.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For
Hi,
I have uploaded a candidate for ant 1.8.1 under
http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/
Also a label ANT_181 has been created in the repository.
Vote to release this build as ant 1.8.1
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
Regards,
Antoine
Hi,
I am starting the process to get a candidate for ant 1.8.1.
I am going to switch our ant site to the branch ANT_SITE, which I have
just updated.
Regards,
Antoine
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
Hi,
I did not manage to get this working this week, I had a lot to do in my
day job.
I plan to work on a 1.8.1 build next week.
Regards,
Antoine
Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2010-04-09, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
I was thinking of Ant 1.8.1.
I
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2010-04-09, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
I was thinking of Ant 1.8.1.
I would like to shoot a build next week.
I'm afraid we have a serious scalability problem with the property
expansion code, see issues 48961 and 49079. OTOH there will l
On 2010-04-09, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
> I was thinking of Ant 1.8.1.
> I would like to shoot a build next week.
I'm afraid we have a serious scalability problem with the property
expansion code, see issues 48961 and 49079. OTOH there will likely
always be one more bug one co
Hi,
I was thinking of Ant 1.8.1.
I would like to shoot a build next week.
Maybe call it 1.8.1_RC1 ? Or directly 1.8.1
We have 16 fixed bugs and 12 other changes already.
Thoughts ?
Regards,
Antoine
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
33 matches
Mail list logo
