James Fuller wrote:
no, I have already gone through the input masking funits more about
locking down...or giving the opportunity to lock down; e.g. secure class
loading, working with digital certs, etc...
to run ant secure you'd need to generate a JAR of everything in the
tasks and tasks.opt
Steve Loughran wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- manual needs some pretty generous scrubbing and reorganisation
(note: not a fan of any of task styles used...ex. WhichResource) and
generally a fresher look and feel.
WhichResource is one of the xdoclet generated docs. New velocity/XSLT
can impro
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> * to allow adding of jars to the current
>>> classloader (would solve a *lot* of problems at the cost of
>>> some issues)
>>>
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* to allow adding of jars to the current
classloader (would solve a *lot* of problems at the cost of
some issues)
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28228
I'm willing to not cast a -1
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>* to allow adding of jars to the current
>classloader (would solve a *lot* of problems at the cost of
>some issues)
>http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28228
I'm willing to not cast a -1 on it, if it is
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do people think is a good release schedule/timetable?
No argument, although I'd prefer a 1.6.3 release schedule first (and
my main issue here would be cutting down open bug reports).
> Should we be organised, build up a list o
Dominique Devienne wrote:
Given that I don't know the task, it's difficult to
gage whether the properties loaded from ${runtime.properties} are used
as properties, i.e. the task also supports a or or
nested element (e.g. , , , ,
etc...)
turned into a set of properties for the JVM underneath, a
> From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Dominique Devienne wrote:
> > I'd like propertyset to stay as a property selector of sort, and not
go
> > into the realm of actually loading or defining properties. A
propertyset
> > should stay has a collections of patterns to select existing
prop
Dominique Devienne wrote:
From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- a way of embedding files into , so you can do
file-based
loading from inside anything that takes a property file. Or some easy
way of going into Java
tasks. I wrote my own element for this for the smartfrog tasks, and it
wa
Matt Benson wrote:
--- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* local properties for macros (most likely Jose's
solution with
an auto removal of the local properties at
the end of the macro)
Do you think the ThreadLocals are just not going to
behave themselves?
Thread locals can
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- manual needs some pretty generous scrubbing and reorganisation (note: not a fan of any of task styles used...ex. WhichResource) and generally a fresher look and feel.
WhichResource is one of the xdoclet generated docs. New velocity/XSLT
can improve that.
- would like to
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
you know, this summer will mark the two year point since Ant 1,6.0
shipped. Which means time for Ant1.7 is nearing.
Hmm, Ant 1.6.0 has been released in December 2003.
OK, I knew it was 2003. That's no so bad...18
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Darin Swanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eclipse 3.1 is coming out in June 2005 as Jan indicated. For me to
have a chance to update and release Ant 1.7 within Eclipse it would
be great to get an Ant release sometime in early May. Otherwise
things start
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Darin Swanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eclipse 3.1 is coming out in June 2005 as Jan indicated. For me to
> have a chance to update and release Ant 1.7 within Eclipse it would
> be great to get an Ant release sometime in early May. Otherwise
> things start getting locked
--- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>* local properties for macros (most likely Jose's
> solution with
>an auto removal of the local properties at
> the end of the macro)
Do you think the ThreadLocals are just not going to
behave themselves?
-Matt
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you know, this summer will mark the two year point since Ant 1,6.0
> shipped. Which means time for Ant1.7 is nearing.
Hmm, Ant 1.6.0 has been released in December 2003.
Stefan
--
01 AM
Please respond to
"Ant Developers List"
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
AW: 1.7 release timetable & features.
Eclipse should is "targeted for late June 2005" [1] and it would be
good to
release Ant 1.7
before,
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
AW: 1.7 release timetable & features.
Eclipse should is "targeted for late June 2005" [1] and it would be good to
release Ant 1.7
before, so that (maybe) Eclipse could ship 1.7. Would be also a good
distribution :-)
Also starting with
> From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> - a way of embedding files into , so you can do
file-based
> loading from inside anything that takes a property file. Or some easy
> way of going into Java
> tasks. I wrote my own element for this for the smartfrog tasks, and it
> was v. useful
note to myself re wish list for Ant 1.7 for the summer...
+1 to minor release to 'bed down' some of the structurally big changes
w/o cross referencing with current buglist/wish listsoff the top of my head;
- manual needs some pretty generous scrubbing and reorganisation (note: not a
fan of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mmh & smartfrog: if you are the author you should be able to
change the license, IMO ;-)
no, because I wrote it for my employer.
I can redo it from scratch though, it wasnt hard.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
you know, this summer will mark the two year point since Ant 1,6.0
shipped. Which means time for Ant1.7 is nearing.
That long?
Should we be organised, build up a list of features and then either
start doing them or scrub them from the list?
I think that without a list it would be too easy to ge
Eclipse should is "targeted for late June 2005" [1] and it would be good to
release Ant 1.7
before, so that (maybe) Eclipse could ship 1.7. Would be also a good
distribution :-)
Also starting with a new minor version (1.6 -> 1.7) we should introduce the
antlib subproject,
because that is a major
> you know, this summer will mark the two year point since Ant 1,6.0
> shipped. Which means time for Ant1.7 is nearing.
>
> What do people think is a good release schedule/timetable?
>
> Or to put it differently, what do people want in *and stable*
> before then?
>
> Things I must have:
>
you know, this summer will mark the two year point since Ant 1,6.0
shipped. Which means time for Ant1.7 is nearing.
What do people think is a good release schedule/timetable?
Or to put it differently, what do people want in *and stable* before then?
Things I must have:
- with security & docs.
-
25 matches
Mail list logo
