Re: [antunit] included/excluded tests patterns

2006-09-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When writing antunit tests, one cannot use the > log-inspection assertions or the new au:logcontent > resource outside the context of an AntUnit test. This > is understandable/unavoidable, Is it? We could add a task that registers a

Re: [antunit] included/excluded tests patterns

2006-09-26 Thread Dominique Devienne
Hopefully you get the idea. Uh, not really ;-) How crazy is this? Not crazy to me, because I implemented this once in the past on top of JUnit (if I half-undertood you). I had a custom TestRunner that accepted an additional -m testMethod switch. It slowly died when the new version of JUnit c

[antunit] included/excluded tests patterns

2006-09-26 Thread Matt Benson
When writing antunit tests, one cannot use the log-inspection assertions or the new au:logcontent resource outside the context of an AntUnit test. This is understandable/unavoidable, but it does mean that there are some tests that cannot be developed with 'ant -f ...'. Obviously you could write n