Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

On 12/19/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >>> RmicAdvancedTest fails for me using JDK 1.6, the stack trace >>> (below) looks like a deeply confused Xerces to me. > >>> [j

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Stefan Bodewig wrote: RmicAdvancedTest fails for me using JDK 1.6, the stack trace (below) looks like a deeply confused Xerces to me. [junit] Testcase: testIIOP(org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.RmicAdvancedTe

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Stefan Bodewig wrote: Stefan. Rebuild the machine, Just installed Service Pack 1 for VS2005 today, felt like rebuilding the machine, no less. It took about 85 minutes, at least twice as long as the initial installation of VS2005, Guidancy Automation Extensions and Toolkit and the VS2005 SDK

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> RmicAdvancedTest fails for me using JDK 1.6, the stack trace >> (below) looks like a deeply confused Xerces to me. >> [junit] Testcase: testIIOP(org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.RmicAdvancedTest): >> Caused an

AW: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Hello Jan, Yes, I did not branch Ant yet, so you can work on SVN HEAD. Regards, Antoine Original-Nachricht Datum: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:40:40 +0100 Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: dev@ant.apache.org Betreff: AW: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done > > * conc

AW: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

> * concerning the WHATSNEW file : I did not have the time and >the knowledge to do an intelligent merge of the 4 sections >which were in the file (Ant 1.6.5 to Ant 1.7.0Beta1 ... to the >new section 1.6.5 to 1.7.0. I would suggest that you correct >it. The corrections will only be in 1.7.1 (un

AW: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Original-Nachricht Datum: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:19:35 +0100 Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: dev@ant.apache.org Betreff: AW: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done > Having a deeper look into the distros ... > > Jan > > > Binary distro: >

AW: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Having a deeper look into the distros ... Jan Binary distro: == WHATSNEW-file - * The -noproxy option which was in the previous 1.7 alpha and beta releases has been removed. It is the default behavior and not needed. should be removed because it is no "Change

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

On 12/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >It seems that the current ant code triggers bugs in jdk1.2. > >We probally should say that ant 1.7.0 does not support >jdk1.2 due to bugs in jdk1.2, and try to find out what is >triggering the bug - hopefully to get a work-a-round for ant

AW: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

>It seems that the current ant code triggers bugs in jdk1.2. > >We probally should say that ant 1.7.0 does not support >jdk1.2 due to bugs in jdk1.2, and try to find out what is >triggering the bug - hopefully to get a work-a-round for ant 1.7.1. > >Have you tried using green threads? (were they s

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I did a third upload where the HasFreeSpace condition will be present. +1 for releasing these builds. Everything looks good. RmicAdvancedTest fails for me using JDK 1.6, the stack trace (below) looks

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

It seems that the current ant code triggers bugs in jdk1.2. We probally should say that ant 1.7.0 does not support jdk1.2 due to bugs in jdk1.2, and try to find out what is triggering the bug - hopefully to get a work-a-round for ant 1.7.1. Have you tried using green threads? (were they still su

AW: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

I just downloaded the latest builds from http://people.apache.org/~antoine/ * binary distro with MD5 ac30ce5b07b0018d65203fbc680968f5 *apache-ant-1.7.0-bin.zip * source distro with MD5 f3c9e94df5f4cc639ad8067700b3d571 *apache-ant-1.7.0-src.zip Using Java Classic VM (build JDK-1.2.1_004, nat

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

+1 Peter On 12/13/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I have updated my SVN sandbox, got the new StringUtils.java, and done a new upload. So we might want to start a new vote. You can download it from this URL : http://people.apache.org/~antoine/ apache-ant-1.7.0/ Due t

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Antoine Levy-Lambert schreef: On Dec 16, 2006, at 5:42 PM, Martijn Kruithof wrote: On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I did a third upload where the HasFreeSpace condition will be present. I am +1 on releasing those, we should however document that

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

On Dec 16, 2006, at 5:42 PM, Martijn Kruithof wrote: On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I did a third upload where the HasFreeSpace condition will be present. I am +1 on releasing those, we should however document that the official release does not w

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I did a third upload where the HasFreeSpace condition will be present. I am +1 on releasing those, we should however document that the official release does not work with jdk 1.2 Also in the WHATSNEW still t

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did a third upload where the HasFreeSpace condition will be > present. +1 for releasing these builds. Everything looks good. RmicAdvancedTest fails for me using JDK 1.6, the stack trace (below) looks like a deeply confused

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

To be honest I don't see where an argument comes in... shouldn't the final release ALSO be an RC? That's what a Release Candidate is, isn't it? +1 -Matt --- Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Antoine, > > On my part I'm happy to say that we should release > as final not RC2, I >

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Hi, I have updated my SVN sandbox, got the new StringUtils.java, and done a new upload. So we might want to start a new vote. You can download it from this URL : http://people.apache.org/~antoine/apache-ant-1.7.0/ Due to our bylaws, if a positive vote happens,

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Hello Antoine, On my part I'm happy to say that we should release as final not RC2, I agree with the fact that people will not test until it becomes a final release (so if we do a RC2, it won't be tested by the users anyway). yes [x] Kev

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Hello Alexey, Jesse, I am getting impatient to get the impact of a real release. In any case, there will be bugs. Which bugs will be found and will be deemed critical nobody knows. We might be in search of perfection, but no matter how many RCs you generate you will never be perfect. Reg

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

I would also call it RC2. - Alexey. On 12/14/06, Jesse Glick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > Do you vote for the release of these binaries ? Numerous changes have been made in the code since RC1, including several new features. Do you think it would be wiser to call t

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Do you vote for the release of these binaries ? Numerous changes have been made in the code since RC1, including several new features. Do you think it would be wiser to call this build RC2 and make that the final release after a week or so - permitting no further

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Hello Martijn, Kevin said he removed the java16 package. HasFreeSpace compiles with 1.5 because it uses reflection. Regards, Antoine Original-Nachricht Datum: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:15:59 +0100 (CET) Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: Ant Developers List Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release of

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Hello Steve, yes, this is it. Regards, Antoine Original-Nachricht Datum: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:00:27 + Von: Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: Ant Developers List Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done > Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Just to interrupt you guys for a sec. This is regarding the mention of the Virtual Ant GUI in the manual. As you probably know, I had submitted modifications to the external.xml file which contains the description of Virtual Ant now. But I also see that the Ant Manual has an 'Editors/IDE Integrati

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

> Hi I thought Kev just (say) he would pull the HasFreeSpace for 1.7.0 to be > added after 1.7.0 is released? > I pulled out the o.a.t.a.util.java16 package as it wasn't used, the hasfreespace condition wasn't pulled as it compiled and ran on both vm's I have (although this isn't an extensive te

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0

Who has upgraded to java 6 yet? I may do it on my laptop I upgraded to java6 (my current boss wanted to upgrade immediately so...), first thoughts - ack it makes eclipse run like an 'asthmatic ant with some heavy shopping', have yet to try it with IDEA, command line usage seems about the same as

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

On 12/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi I thought Kev just (say) he would pull the HasFreeSpace for 1.7.0 to be added after 1.7.0 is released? I think that it is ok to have hasfreespace in the release. That is, the risk is very small that it will cause any more problems. T

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Hi I thought Kev just (say) he would pull the HasFreeSpace for 1.7.0 to be added after 1.7.0 is released? shouldn't we wait for that? Martijn On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Steve Loughran wrote: Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Hello, I did a third upload where the HasFreeSpace condition will be prese

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Hello, I did a third upload where the HasFreeSpace condition will be present. Regards, Antoine ok. is this the artifact I should be voting on? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addi

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0

Kevin Jackson wrote: This is life! a sequence of lessons! A day where you learn something is a good day (generally), but I should've just held back the changes until the release had happened, then I could have added them to trunk and not broken this release - doh! That's why we have release

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0

Kevin Jackson wrote: For the condition that's fine, but for the java16 package, it will not compile on java5 (not that the code in there is used at the moment) In fact unless anyone thinks I should leave this in, I'm going to pull the util.java16 package from svn head and alter the build.xml to

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Hello, I did a third upload where the HasFreeSpace condition will be present. Regards, Antoine On Dec 13, 2006, at 5:48 AM, Kevin Jackson wrote: Hi Antoine, I have updated my SVN sandbox, got the new StringUtils.java, and done a new upload. Do you have the recent fixes I made? Peter, s

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Hi, no, I did not have your changes. I will do again a rebuild now. Regards, Antoine On Dec 13, 2006, at 5:48 AM, Kevin Jackson wrote: Hi Antoine, I have updated my SVN sandbox, got the new StringUtils.java, and done a new upload. Do you have the recent fixes I made? Peter, should I me

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0

This is life! a sequence of lessons! A day where you learn something is a good day (generally), but I should've just held back the changes until the release had happened, then I could have added them to trunk and not broken this release - doh! Oh and there's nothing like learning a valuable lif

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

On 12/13/06, Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Antoine, > I have updated my SVN sandbox, got the new StringUtils.java, and done > a new upload. > Do you have the recent fixes I made? Peter, should I merge the fixes into ANT_170 as well as svn trunk? No, this is the responsibility of

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Hi Antoine, I have updated my SVN sandbox, got the new StringUtils.java, and done a new upload. Do you have the recent fixes I made? Peter, should I merge the fixes into ANT_170 as well as svn trunk? Kev - To unsubscribe,

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

On 12/13/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I have updated my SVN sandbox, got the new StringUtils.java, and done a new upload. Hi Antonine, did you get the last change from Kev? Peter So we might want to start a new vote. You can download it from this URL : http://pe

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0

On 12/13/06, Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ah I see it now. oata.util.java16. > Yes, pull this, it is not used anymore! Done and altered the build.xml to remove the selector that was no longer needed either /me learns valuable lesson in trying to get a new feature in close to releas

[VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done

Hi, I have updated my SVN sandbox, got the new StringUtils.java, and done a new upload. So we might want to start a new vote. You can download it from this URL : http://people.apache.org/~antoine/ apache-ant-1.7.0/ Due to our bylaws, if a positive vote happens, the effective release da

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0

Ah I see it now. oata.util.java16. Yes, pull this, it is not used anymore! Done and altered the build.xml to remove the selector that was no longer needed either /me learns valuable lesson in trying to get a new feature in close to release (mea culpa for all the problems today) :( Kev

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0

On 12/13/06, Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For the condition that's fine, but for the java16 package, it will not > compile on java5 (not that the code in there is used at the moment) In fact unless anyone thinks I should leave this in, I'm going to pull the util.java16 package from

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0

For the condition that's fine, but for the java16 package, it will not compile on java5 (not that the code in there is used at the moment) In fact unless anyone thinks I should leave this in, I'm going to pull the util.java16 package from svn head and alter the build.xml to remove the selector

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0

On 12/13/06, Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi > eek, I did not see that.! :( > The point of using reflection is to have the condition > in the ant distro. > For the condition that's fine, but for the java16 package, it will not compile on java5 (not that the code in there is used a

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0

Hi eek, I did not see that.! :( The point of using reflection is to have the condition in the ant distro. For the condition that's fine, but for the java16 package, it will not compile on java5 (not that the code in there is used at the moment) Kev --

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0

On 12/13/06, Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The code uses reflection so it should compile on jdk 1.5 and > work on jdk 1.6. I put a conditional compile in the build.xml file so that the hasfreespace code isn't even compiled on pre 1.6 jdks :

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0

The code uses reflection so it should compile on jdk 1.5 and work on jdk 1.6. I put a conditional compile in the build.xml file so that the hasfreespace code isn't even compiled on pre 1.6 jdks : In reality, HasFreeSpace can be compiled on java5 (and lower

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0

On 12/13/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Dec 13, 2006, at 4:26 AM, Peter Reilly wrote: > On 12/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > nrw.de> wrote: >> -1: doesnt compile on JDK-1.2.1_004: > > or jdk 1.3. > >> >> src\main\org\apache\tools\ant\util\StringUtils.java:2

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0

On Dec 13, 2006, at 4:26 AM, Peter Reilly wrote: On 12/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED] nrw.de> wrote: -1: doesnt compile on JDK-1.2.1_004: or jdk 1.3. src\main\org\apache\tools\ant\util\StringUtils.java:205: Method matches(java.lang.String) not found in class java.lang.S tri

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0

rtTrue doesn't support the nested "hasfreespace" element. [au:antunit]took 0.003 sec Peter Jan >-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Von: Kevin Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. Dezember 2006 06:30 >An: Ant Developers List >Betreff: Re:

AW: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0

emove Java1.4 specific methods from parseHumanSizes Jan >-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Von: Kevin Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. Dezember 2006 06:30 >An: Ant Developers List >Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 > >My vote (so far) &

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0

My vote (so far) > [x] Yes All good so far - thanks Antoine! Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0

[x] Yes [ ] No -- Alexey N. Solofnenko Pleasant Hill, CA (GMT-8 usually) smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

[VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0

Good evening, I have built a release candidate for Ant 1.7.0 You can download it from this URL : http://people.apache.org/~antoine/ apache-ant-1.7.0/ Due to our bylaws, if a positive vote happens, the effective release date (already entered in the doc) will be Dec 19, 2006. Do you vote fo