On 12/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi I thought Kev just (say) he would pull the HasFreeSpace for 1.7.0 to be added after 1.7.0 is released?
I think that it is ok to have hasfreespace in the release. That is, the risk is very small that it will cause any more problems. The problems it had were due to the lastness of it been added to the code base, and the use of java6. The code itself does not affect other parts of the system, so it is a contained risk. It may be more risky to pull the code now. Peter
shouldn't we wait for that? Martijn On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Steve Loughran wrote: > Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I did a third upload where the HasFreeSpace condition will be present. >> >> Regards, >> >> Antoine > > ok. is this the artifact I should be voting on? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
