Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release (second attempt)

2008-03-03 Thread Gilles Scokart
I test the binary. I just got one "regression". I had a script containing And this give an error = overriding a previous definition of ivy:settings with the id 'ivy.instance2' is not allowed when using override='notallowed'. But I don't thing that any other ivy:settings was already executed.

Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release (second attempt)

2008-03-03 Thread Xavier Hanin
This vote is almost over, we already have 3 binding +1, so this is enough. But I'd really like to have your vote, Gilles (whatever it is). Have you had time to quickly check the binaries? Xavier On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's my own +1 > > On M

Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release (second attempt)

2008-02-29 Thread Xavier Hanin
Here's my own +1 On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have built a second release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0-beta2. > Compared to the first attempt, the only change is that I've applied > IVY-744 fix that Gilles has checked in on trunk. > > You can download i

Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release (second attempt)

2008-02-27 Thread Xavier Hanin
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Adrian Sandor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > - [Error] :43:30: cos-nonambig: "":license and WC[##any] (or > elements > > > > from their substitution group) violate "Unique Particle > Attribution". > > > > During validation against this schema, ambiguity wou

Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release (second attempt)

2008-02-27 Thread Adrian Sandor
> > > > - [Error] :43:30: cos-nonambig: "":license and WC[##any] (or elements > > > from their substitution group) violate "Unique Particle Attribution". > > > During validation against this schema, ambiguity would be created for > > > those two particles. > Created IVY-750 > > > - in SFTPReposi

Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release (second attempt)

2008-02-27 Thread Xavier Hanin
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Adrian Sandor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Adrian Sandor wrote: > > Xavier Hanin wrote: > >> I have built a second release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0-beta2. > >> > >> Do you vote for the release of these binaries? > >> > > Well, I don't really have time to test it; h

Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release (second attempt)

2008-02-27 Thread Xavier Hanin
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Adrian Sandor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Xavier Hanin wrote: > > I have built a second release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0-beta2. > > > > Do you vote for the release of these binaries? > > > Well, I don't really have time to test it; however I noticed 2 issues > wit

Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release (second attempt)

2008-02-27 Thread Adrian Sandor
Adrian Sandor wrote: Xavier Hanin wrote: I have built a second release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0-beta2. Do you vote for the release of these binaries? Well, I don't really have time to test it; however I noticed 2 issues with the current code from svn: - [Error] :43:30: cos-nonambig: "":licen

Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release (second attempt)

2008-02-27 Thread Adrian Sandor
Xavier Hanin wrote: I have built a second release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0-beta2. Do you vote for the release of these binaries? Well, I don't really have time to test it; however I noticed 2 issues with the current code from svn: - [Error] :43:30: cos-nonambig: "":license and WC[##any] (or e

Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release (second attempt)

2008-02-27 Thread Xavier Hanin
FYI I've created three issues related to license in .patterns (IVY-747), ant.jar exclusion in bin-with-deps (IVY-748), and removing jars from distrib directory (IVY-749). Xavier On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 6:14 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL

Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release (second attempt)

2008-02-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The bin-with-deps distribution contains an ant-1.6.jar. Which x of >> 1.6.x is this? Why not 1.7.0? Is this an unmodified version of >> Ant's jar (I don't

Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release (second attempt)

2008-02-26 Thread Maarten Coene
+1 Maarten - Original Message From: Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Ant Developers List Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 10:15:13 AM Subject: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release (second attempt) I have built a second release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0-beta2. Compared to the first a

Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release (second attempt)

2008-02-26 Thread shemnon
> [ ] No > > Regards, > > Xavier Hanin, Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 release manager > > -- > Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant > http://xhab.blogspot.com/ > http://ant.apache.org/ivy/ > http://www.xoocode.org/ > > -- View this message in context: http://

Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release (second attempt)

2008-02-26 Thread Xavier Hanin
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As usual I lack the technological competence to vote on this part, so > I've again concentrated on checking the legal requirements and > infrastructire stuff. > > So far I didn't find any issues, which means I'm +1 on th

Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release (second attempt)

2008-02-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
As usual I lack the technological competence to vote on this part, so I've again concentrated on checking the legal requirements and infrastructire stuff. So far I didn't find any issues, which means I'm +1 on the release. The only stuff flagged by RAT are some JQuery files, the generated package

[VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release (second attempt)

2008-02-25 Thread Xavier Hanin
I have built a second release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0-beta2. Compared to the first attempt, the only change is that I've applied IVY-744 fix that Gilles has checked in on trunk. You can download it from this URL: http://people.apache.org/~xavier/ivy/staging/2.0.0-beta2/

Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release

2008-02-25 Thread Xavier Hanin
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/2/24, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Indeed, it would make sense to fix this regression before releasing. > > Gilles, > > what's your opinion on this? Any comment on the "optional/test doesn't > > make > >

Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release

2008-02-24 Thread Gilles Scokart
2008/2/24, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Indeed, it would make sense to fix this regression before releasing. > Gilles, > what's your opinion on this? Any comment on the "optional/test doesn't > make > sense" comment in the code? > > I'm also wondering what I meant ;-) I think it means that

Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release

2008-02-24 Thread Xavier Hanin
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-744 IVY-744 fixed, it is a > regression in the new maven DOM parser from the old SAX parser. Indeed, it would make sense to fix this regression before releasing. Gilles, what's your opinion on this? Any comment on the "optional/test doesn't make s

Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release

2008-02-23 Thread shemnon
prefer to have http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-744 IVY-744 fixed, it is a regression in the new maven DOM parser from the old SAX parser. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Ivy-2.0.0-beta2-Release-tp15652396p156

[VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release

2008-02-23 Thread Xavier Hanin
I have built a release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 You can download it from this URL: http://people.apache.org/~xavier/ivy/staging/2.0.0-beta2/ Do you vote for the release of these binaries? [ ] Yes [ ] No Regards, Xavier Hanin, Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 release manager -- Xavier Hanin - Independen