Re: [VOTE] Ant source tree reorganization

2010-05-24 Thread Kevin Jackson
Hi, On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Jesse Glick wrote: > Should the Ant source tree (src/main/ and perhaps also src/tests/) be split > into subtrees? > > [ ] No, leave it the way it is - one big tree, using to > conditionally compile pieces and route classes to various JARs. > > [ ] Yes, split

Re: [VOTE] Ant source tree reorganization

2010-05-22 Thread Martijn Kruithof
On 18-5-2010 4:11, Jesse Glick wrote: Should the Ant source tree (src/main/ and perhaps also src/tests/) be split into subtrees? [ ] No, leave it the way it is - one big tree, using to conditionally compile pieces and route classes to various JARs. [ x ] Yes, split it into subtrees, where e

Re: [VOTE] Ant source tree reorganization

2010-05-19 Thread Gilles Scokart
On 18 May 2010 04:11, Jesse Glick wrote: > Should the Ant source tree (src/main/ and perhaps also src/tests/) be split > into subtrees? > > [ ] No, leave it the way it is - one big tree, using to > conditionally compile pieces and route classes to various JARs. > > [X] Yes, split it into subtree

Re: [VOTE] Ant source tree reorganization

2010-05-18 Thread Bruce Atherton
On 17/05/2010 7:11 PM, Jesse Glick wrote: Should the Ant source tree (src/main/ and perhaps also src/tests/) be split into subtrees? [ ] No, leave it the way it is - one big tree, using to conditionally compile pieces and route classes to various JARs. [ ] Yes, split it into subtrees, where

Re: [VOTE] Ant source tree reorganization

2010-05-18 Thread Jesse Glick
On 05/18/2010 04:02 AM, Jean-Louis Boudart wrote: I was just wondering that if you're going to reorganize the whole source tree and have distinct structure for each "produced jar", maybe we could use easyant I wasn't intending to use EasyAnt, though I imagine that would be a reasonable increme

Re: [VOTE] Ant source tree reorganization

2010-05-18 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2010-05-18, Jesse Glick wrote: > Should the Ant source tree (src/main/ and perhaps also src/tests/) be > split into subtrees? > [ ] No, leave it the way it is - one big tree, using to > conditionally compile pieces and route classes to various JARs. > [ ] Yes, split it into subtrees, where

Re: [VOTE] Ant source tree reorganization

2010-05-18 Thread Peter Reilly
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:11 AM, Jesse Glick wrote: > Should the Ant source tree (src/main/ and perhaps also src/tests/) be split > into subtrees? > > [X] No, leave it the way it is - one big tree, using to > conditionally compile pieces and route classes to various JARs. > > [ ] Yes, split it in

Re: [VOTE] Ant source tree reorganization

2010-05-18 Thread Jean-Louis Boudart
Hi, I was just wondering that if you're going to reorganize the whole source tree and have distinct structure for each "produced jar", maybe we could use easyant :). Note that the next release of easyant will provide a maven-publisher plugin. Ping me if you want to POC this or have more informatio

Re: [VOTE] Ant source tree reorganization

2010-05-17 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hi, Jesse Glick wrote: > Should the Ant source tree (src/main/ and perhaps also src/tests/) be > split into subtrees? > > [ ] No, leave it the way it is - one big tree, using to > conditionally compile pieces and route classes to various JARs. > > [ x] Yes, split it into subtrees, where each tree

[VOTE] Ant source tree reorganization

2010-05-17 Thread Jesse Glick
Should the Ant source tree (src/main/ and perhaps also src/tests/) be split into subtrees? [ ] No, leave it the way it is - one big tree, using to conditionally compile pieces and route classes to various JARs. [ ] Yes, split it into subtrees, where each tree maps to an output JAR, may have