On 2010-05-18, Jesse Glick <jesse.gl...@oracle.com> wrote: > Should the Ant source tree (src/main/ and perhaps also src/tests/) be > split into subtrees?
> [ ] No, leave it the way it is - one big tree, using <selector> to > conditionally compile pieces and route classes to various JARs. > [ ] Yes, split it into subtrees, where each tree maps to an output > JAR, may have its own classpath, and is compiled completely or not at > all. I have a preference for "leave it the way it is" but not strong enough to vote against a split. Count that as an abstain. > And while we're at it: > Should ant.jar and ant-nodeps.jar be consolidated? > [ ] No, leave these as two JAR outputs (and two subtrees if the first > proposal is accepted). > [X] Yes, merge them into one ant.jar (and one subtree " " " " " "), to > include all tasks and types with no linkage-level deps on 3rd-party > libraries (even if there is an implicit dep on a 3rd-party tool such > as Perforce), and remove the "Core" vs. "Optional" distinction in the > manual. Yes, merge them. We might leave an empty ant-nodeps.jar around if this helps downstream distributors. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
