a little change in the plan.
As I'm lacking parts of the required libraries (the weblogic stuff),
Conor has offered to build the distribution. I'll propose the vote
after he had the time to create and upload the distributions tomorrow
instead of today.
Cheers
Stefan
---
+1 on the content of 1.5.4 and the overall plan!
> No long winded plan as this one should be rather trivial IMHO.
>
> The plan:
>
> * We don't commit anything to the 1.5 branch anymore (we don't so so
> anyway).
>
> * On Monday August 11th during the morning (GMT) the release manager
> sync
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Magesh Umasankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you plan just to replace the affected files in the 1.5.3-1
> binaries and name it 1.5.4, or build everything from scratch?
It may be a little hard to do the selective replace - some manual
pages have changed and so has the websi
- Original Message -
From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Apart from the reason I've mentioned (only a handful of well tested
> changes), there is another one. If we make an RC, people will expect
> that we fix bugs found in that RC. We already know about bugs in it,
> namely th
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 01:28:37PM +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Paul Nasrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Please can the javacc fix go in too.
>
> I wouldn't want to. Not because the change was too big, but simply to
> keep this release (and its process) as low level as
On Thursday 07 August 2003 12:28, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
> VAJ is in as the people who will benefit from the changes won't
> benefit from Ant 1.6 (as VAJ runs on a JDK 1.1 VM).
Ah!
Now I understand...
+1 for the release
-
To uns
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Paul Nasrat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please can the javacc fix go in too.
I wouldn't want to. Not because the change was too big, but simply to
keep this release (and its process) as low level as possible. If we
add the javacc changes, why not do the same for the VSS cha
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 01:46:24PM +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> No long winded plan as this one should be rather trivial IMHO.
>
> The plan:
Sounds good.
> The only changes over 1.5.3 will be the changes to and the VAJ
> tasks. Therefore I plan to explicitly state in the release notes as
>
+0 - go for it if you like! :)
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 01:41 PM, Steve Loughran wrote:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
No long winded plan as this one should be rather trivial IMHO.
+1
The plan:
* We don't commit anything to the 1.5 branch anymore (we don't so so
anyway).
* On Monday August 11t
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
No long winded plan as this one should be rather trivial IMHO.
+1
The plan:
* We don't commit anything to the 1.5 branch anymore (we don't so so
anyway).
* On Monday August 11th during the morning (GMT) the release manager
syncs the website changes from the HEAD branch to
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Magesh Umasankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +0 on making a release without a beta/rc cycle.
Apart from the reason I've mentioned (only a handful of well tested
changes), there is another one. If we make an RC, people will expect
that we fix bugs found in that RC. We alread
+1
I can also help with the build.
Conor
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 on the overall plan.
+0 on making a release without a beta/rc cycle.
Cheers,
Magesh
- Original Message -
From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:46 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Ant 1.5.4 Release Plan
> No
+1
I volunteer to help.
Antoine
- Original Message -
From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:46 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Ant 1.5.4 Release Plan
> No long winded plan as this one should be rather tr
No long winded plan as this one should be rather trivial IMHO.
The plan:
* We don't commit anything to the 1.5 branch anymore (we don't so so
anyway).
* On Monday August 11th during the morning (GMT) the release manager
syncs the website changes from the HEAD branch to the 1.5 branch and
c
15 matches
Mail list logo
