m not sure this Eclipse updatesite is still needed since we archived
IvyDE, but it was still in the release procedure)
Do you vote for the release of these binaries?
The vote will be open for at least 72 hoursand close no earlier than 26st
December 2024 14:00 UTC.
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
Regards,
Maarten
+1 (non-binding)
I checked the bin/src tar.gz artifacts for:
LICENSE & NOTICE files
Checksums and hashes
I ran the Groovy build (has several hundred tests involving Ivy)
against the staging repo.
Maybe a personal preference, but I like having the KEYS file
referenced in the VOTE email; but
My bad, I've fixed it now.
Maarten
Op woensdag 25 december 2024 om 18:56:13 CET schreef Stefan Bodewig
:
On 2024-12-25, Martijn Kruithof wrote:
> doap file is missing a tag between versions 2.5.3
> and 2.5.2. this should not be blocking in my view as doap seems not to
> be actually us
On 2024-12-25, Martijn Kruithof wrote:
> doap file is missing a tag between versions 2.5.3
> and 2.5.2. this should not be blocking in my view as doap seems not to
> be actually used anywhere anymore. (Maybe remove the file entirely at
> the next release?)
The file is used to provide the informa
/2.5.3/
The Eclipse updatesite has been build there:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/ivyde/updatesite/ivy-2.5.3.final_20241223125031/
(I'm not sure this Eclipse updatesite is still needed since we archived
IvyDE, but it was still in the release procedure)
Do you vote for the re
build there:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/ivyde/updatesite/ivy-2.5.3.final_20241223125031/
(I'm not sure this Eclipse updatesite is still needed since we archived
IvyDE, but it was still in the release procedure)
Do you vote for the release of these binaries?
The vote will be ope
Hi Maarten
Many thanks for cutting the release. It may become difficult to muster
enough votes during the holiday season, though.
I've checked the legal ASF requirements and compared the source zip to
the git tag, all looks good.
+1
Stefan
PS:
please create a pgp signed tag for the final rele
n the release procedure)
Do you vote for the release of these binaries?
The vote will be open for at least 72 hoursand close no earlier than 26st
December 2024 14:00 UTC.
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
Regards,
Maarten Coene
jects and let
us know if there are any issues.
This is a vote email and the voting will be open for at least 72
hours and close no earlier than 28th August 2024 21:00 UTC.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsub
that version of Ant in Java 18 and higher,
so it's a sign that the changes we did to stop setting SecurityManager
at runtime in Ant hasn't impacted projects adversely.
Please give this proposed release a try against your projects and let
us know if there are any issues.
This is a
are any issues.
This is a vote email and the voting will be open for at least 72 hours
and close no earlier than 28th August 2024 21:00 UTC.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additiona
On 2024-08-25, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> git tag: ANT_1.10.15_RC2
> on commit: 92fe5ca29625d30b98704806d6379fe9acb001e3
> tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/
> svn revision: 71094
+1
Stefan
-
To unsubsc
with FTPS.
Fixed the ftp documentation/manual as well as included this change in
the WHATSNEW file.
With these changes, I've now initiated a vote mail of RC2 for Ant
1.10.15 release. Thank you again for spotting these issues.
-Jaikiran
Thanks a lot!
Martijn
Op 19/08/2024 om 16:53
7;s a sign
that the changes we did to stop setting SecurityManager at runtime in
Ant hasn't impacted projects adversely.
Please give this proposed release a try against your projects and let us
know if there are any issues.
This is a vote email and the voting will be open for at least 72 ho
Contributors)
- FTP task now has an (experimental? / undocumented) option to use a
secure data channel with FTPS.
Thanks a lot!
Martijn
Op 19/08/2024 om 16:53 schreef Stefan Bodewig:
On 2024-08-18, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
This is a vote email and the voting will be open for at least 72 hours
On 2024-08-18, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> This is a vote email and the voting will be open for at least 72 hours
> and close no earlier than 21st August 2024 14:30 UTC.
+1
compared tag and source tarball, checked hashes and signatures. Things
look good to me.
Thanks
did to stop setting SecurityManager
at runtime in Ant hasn't impacted projects adversely.
Please give this proposed release a try against your projects and let
us know if there are any issues.
This is a vote email and the voting will be open for at least 72 hours
and close no earlier than 2
7;s a sign
that the changes we did to stop setting SecurityManager at runtime in
Ant hasn't impacted projects adversely.
Please give this proposed release a try against your projects and let us
know if there are any issues.
This is a vote email and the voting will be open for at least 72 ho
On 2024-06-16, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Given all this, I would like to officially call for vote to EOL 1.9.x
> releases. What that would mean is that there won't be any more Ant
> 1.9.x releases. Ant 1.9.16, the last release in this 1.9.x series, 3
> years back, would officially be
+1
Maarten
Op zondag 16 juni 2024 om 08:12:07 CEST schreef Jaikiran Pai
:
Hello everyone,
4 years back in 2020, we initiated an vote to EOL 1.9.x release versions
of Apache Ant. We didn't receive enough votes at that time to formalize
it (which is OK). The last release of An
+1
Martijn
Op 16/06/2024 om 14:47 schreef Nicolas Lalevée:
+1
Nicolas
Le 16 juin 2024 à 08:10, Jaikiran Pai a écrit :
Hello everyone,
4 years back in 2020, we initiated an vote to EOL 1.9.x release versions of
Apache Ant. We didn't receive enough votes at that time to formali
m, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> 4 years back in 2020, we initiated an vote to EOL 1.9.x release versions of
>> Apache Ant. We didn't receive enough votes at that time to formalize it
>> (which is OK). The last release of Ant 1.9.x release series w
+1
Nicolas
> Le 16 juin 2024 à 08:10, Jaikiran Pai a écrit :
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> 4 years back in 2020, we initiated an vote to EOL 1.9.x release versions of
> Apache Ant. We didn't receive enough votes at that time to formalize it
> (which is OK). The last re
On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 8:14 AM Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Implicit +1 from me.
Makes complete sense. +1
>
Implicit +1 from me.
-Jaikiran
On 16/06/24 11:40 am, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Hello everyone,
4 years back in 2020, we initiated an vote to EOL 1.9.x release
versions of Apache Ant. We didn't receive enough votes at that time to
formalize it (which is OK). The last release of Ant 1.9.x re
ow is
https://ant.apache.org/processes.html#Retire%20a%20subproject%20or%20component
This is a new vote as I do not want to assume I could transfer the votes
of a different vote and repurpose them.
The actual vote:
Following our own rules I propose zo retire IvyDE.
Vote will be open for at lease 72
h all subprojects.
The correct process to follow is
https://ant.apache.org/processes.html#Retire%20a%20subproject%20or%20component
This is a new vote as I do not want to assume I could transfer the votes
of a different vote and repurpose them.
The actual vote:
Following our own rules I propose zo r
> The correct process to follow is
> https://ant.apache.org/processes.html#Retire%20a%20subproject%20or%20component
>
> This is a new vote as I do not want to assume I could transfer the votes
> of a different vote and repurpose them.
Thank you for your diligence.
>
> The
On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 8:19 AM Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Following our own rules I propose to retire IvyDE.
>
+1. --DD
The correct process to follow is
https://ant.apache.org/processes.html#Retire%20a%20subproject%20or%20component
This is a new vote as I do not want to assume I could transfer the votes
of a different vote and repurpose them.
The actual vote:
Following our own rules I propose zo retire IvyDE.
Vote
e%20a%20subproject%20or%20component
This is a new vote as I do not want to assume I could transfer the votes
of a different vote and repurpose them.
The actual vote:
Following our own rules I propose zo retire IvyDE.
Vote will be open for at lease 72 hours, will not end before 2023-11-26T07:30
UTC
On 2023-11-20, Nicolas Lalevée wrote:
> PS: a little part of me is crying, this project was my first substantial
> involvement in the ASF ^^
I understand you far better than you will know. Letting go is hard and I
can't say I'd be happy calling for this vote..
Cheers
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 6:40 PM Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> I hereby propose to create a board resolution that will send IvyDE to
> the Apache Attic.
>
+1. --DD
community willing to keep it
alive. Consequently I now call for a vote to send IvyDE to the Apache
Attic following the rules layed out in https://attic.apache.org/process.html
The attic doesn't have to be a dead-end. If there are people who want to
fork IvyDE outside of the ASF they are free
as a community willing to keep it
> alive. Consequently I now call for a vote to send IvyDE to the Apache
> Attic following the rules layed out in https://attic.apache.org/process.html
>
> The attic doesn't have to be a dead-end. If there are people who want to
> fork IvyDE outside of
+1
Martijn
Op 20/11/2023 om 04:50 schreef Jaikiran Pai:
On 19/11/23 11:09 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
...
So here is the formal vote:
I hereby propose to create a board resolution that will send IvyDE to
the Apache Attic.
+1
-Jaikiran
On 19/11/23 11:09 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
...
So here is the formal vote:
I hereby propose to create a board resolution that will send IvyDE to
the Apache Attic.
+1
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
officially recording my own vote
On 2023-11-19, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> So here is the formal vote:
> I hereby propose to create a board resolution that will send IvyDE to
> the Apache Attic.
+1
Stefan
-
To unsub
Hi all,
within the "Future of Ivy and IvyDE" thread[1] I started about three
months ago to me it seemed as if people wouldn't be happy if IvyDE died
but I also didn't sense there was a community willing to keep it
alive. Consequently I now call for a vote to send IvyDE
Thanks Jaikiran!
Here is my vote: +1
Maarten
Op woensdag 16 augustus 2023 om 14:35:43 CEST schreef Jaikiran Pai
:
Hello everyone,
I've created RC1 release candidate for Ant 1.10.14 release:
git tag: ANT_1.10.14_RC1
on commit: 53f19eccf49acf526415997046dca5a5135b0e8f
tar
Thanks Stefan!
Here is my vote: +1
Maarten
Op donderdag 17 augustus 2023 om 18:54:01 CEST schreef Stefan Bodewig
:
Hi all
I've cancelled the previous vote as the NOTICE file didn't contain
2023. sorry about this. Now I've built a new release candidate for Ivy
2.5.2
Ch
just officially registering my implicit +1
Stefan
On 2023-08-17, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all
> I've cancelled the previous vote as the NOTICE file didn't contain
> 2023. sorry about this. Now I've built a new release candidate for Ivy
> 2.5.2
> Changelog:
&g
+1
Downloaded the RC2 of 2.5.2 and built some projects, checked some
manuals and docs and the checksum.
-Jaikiran
On 17/08/23 10:22 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
I've cancelled the previous vote as the NOTICE file didn't contain
2023. sorry about this. Now I've buil
anges in this release are noted in
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/RELEASE-NOTES-1.10.14.html.
Please do give this proposed release version a try against whichever
Java runtime versions you plan to use it against (this version
requires a minimum of Java 8 runtime, like any other An
Hi all
I've cancelled the previous vote as the NOTICE file didn't contain
2023. sorry about this. Now I've built a new release candidate for Ivy
2.5.2
Changelog:
- FIX: ivy:retrieve could fail because of a `NullPointerException` (IVY-1641)
- FIX: reading POMs may loose de
On 2023-08-17, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> On 17/08/23 10:02 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> I have not built the update site because I couldn't get the build
>> process to work, so if anybody with the proper build environment wants
>> to create one, thank you. I'm sure we can create it after the release i
On 2023-08-17, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> The NOTICE file however will need an update to the year (it's
> currently having 2022).
Ah, too bad, let me re-roll the artifacts.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache
On 17/08/23 10:02 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
I have not built the update site because I couldn't get the build
process to work, so if anybody with the proper build environment wants
to create one, thank you. I'm sure we can create it after the release if
we want to.
Is this the Eclipse update
ure we can create it after the release if
we want to.
Do you vote for the release of these binaries?
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
This vote will be open for 72 hours as usual, I'll close it on
2023-08-20 4:30 UTC.
Thanks
Stefan
---
On 2023-08-16, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> I've created RC1 release candidate for Ant 1.10.14 release:
+1
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
#x27;t get the build
process to work, so if anybody with the proper build environment wants
to create one, thank you. I'm sure we can create it after the release if
we want to.
Do you vote for the release of these binaries?
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
This vote will be open for 72 hours as usual, I'
Sounds good!
Thank you,
Gary
From: Jaikiran Pai
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 8:57:09 PM
To: Ant Developers List ; Gary Gregory
; Ant Users List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.14 based on RC1
EXTERNAL EMAIL
Hello Gary,
Yes, that
yes.
Gary
From: Jaikiran Pai
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 8:35:22 AM
To: u...@ant.apache.org ; dev@ant.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.14 based on RC1
EXTERNAL EMAIL
Hello everyone,
I've created RC1 release candidate for Ant 1.10.14 release:
git tag:
tps://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/RELEASE-NOTES-1.10.14.html.
>
> Please do give this proposed release version a try against whichever
> Java runtime versions you plan to use it against (this version requires
> a minimum of Java 8 runtime, like any other Ant 1.10.x versions). Even
>
@ant.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.14 based on RC1
EXTERNAL EMAIL
Hello everyone,
I've created RC1 release candidate for Ant 1.10.14 release:
git tag: ANT_1.10.14_RC1
on commit: 53f19eccf49acf526415997046dca5a5135b0e8f
tarballs:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dis
m of Java 8 runtime, like any other Ant 1.10.x versions). Even
if you don't vote, if you do run into issues, please report back - it
takes time to create Ant releases, so catching any blocker issues (like
some of which we saw after Ant 1.10.13 was released) early will help fix
them soone
Thank you everyone for testing this release and voting on it. With +1s
from Stefan, me and Martijn, this release voting has now passed.
I'll now move ahead with the rest of the release process.
-Jaikiran
On 10/01/23 12:47 am, Martijn Kruithof wrote:
+1
checked diff to of indicated commit to
+1
checked diff to of indicated commit to rel/1.10.12
Martijn
Op 09/01/2023 om 02:30 schreef Jaikiran Pai:
+1
Tried the new version to build some existing projects - worked fine
Checked NOTICE file and some random manual docs - looks fine
-Jaikiran
On 06/01/23 4:57 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote
+1
Tried the new version to build some existing projects - worked fine
Checked NOTICE file and some random manual docs - looks fine
-Jaikiran
On 06/01/23 4:57 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2023-01-04, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
Happy new year, everyone :)
to you as well
I've created RC1 release
On 2023-01-04, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Happy new year, everyone :)
to you as well
> I've created RC1 release candidate for Ant 1.10.13 release:
> git tag: ANT_1.10.13_RC1
> on commit: 6996b80b5fb59cc2769f7098d837de32680a
> tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/
+1
Stefa
a try against various Java versions of your
choice (starting Java 8) on the operating systems that you usually use
to build your projects. The complete release notes is available at
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/RELEASE-NOTES-1.10.13.html.
This vote will be open for at least 72 hour
.1/
I have not built the update site because I couldn't get the build
process to work, so if anybody with the proper build environment wants
to create one, thank you. I'm sure we can create it after the release if
we want to.
Do you vote for the release of these binaries?
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
the build
process to work, so if anybody with the proper build environment wants
to create one, thank you. I'm sure we can create it after the release if
we want to.
Do you vote for the release of these binaries?
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
This vote will be open for 72 hours as usual, I'll
r build environment wants
to create one, thank you. I'm sure we can create it after the release if
we want to.
Do you vote for the release of these binaries?
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
This vote will be open for 72 hours as usual, I'll close it
cheant-1052
> Snapcraft Build
> Revision 22 in latest/candidate
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours and close no earlier than
> 16th October 2021 05:30 AM UTC.
>
> -Jaikiran
>
-
To un
ommit: 4b420359942dfb1221f308d08f3648712fea9f83
tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/
revision: 50387
Maven artifacts:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheant-1052
Snapcraft Build
Revision 22 in latest/candidate
This vote will be open for at least 72 hours and clo
On 2021-10-13, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> I've created a new RC2 release candidate for 1.10.12:
+1
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
ories/orgapacheant-1052
Snapcraft Build
Revision 22 in latest/candidate
This vote will be open for at least 72 hours and close no earlier than
16th October 2021 05:30 AM UTC.
-Jaikiran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-uns
m.xml files.
As a result, I will cancel this vote and will initiate a new vote which
should include these fixes, shortly.
Thank you all for voting and testing the release artifacts. Sorry about
the delay in my responses this week - it has been a busy week at work.
-Jaikiran
On 07/10/21 7:
On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 at 15:48, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>
> Please not that the ASF nor its projects release Binaries.
> (They are provided to users as a convenience)
> We also do not vote on releases based on Binaries.
>
> The vote should be based on whether or not the 'so
un against various versions of
> Java, including early access releases and even the recently released
> Java 17. None of our tests have shown any relevant failures in these
> releases. If this is more of a general suggestion for our test cases in
> Ant and if this doesn't have an i
sions of
Java, including early access releases and even the recently released
Java 17. None of our tests have shown any relevant failures in these
releases. If this is more of a general suggestion for our test cases in
Ant and if this doesn't have an impact on the vote of this release,
p
Hello Paul,
On 05/10/21 2:27 pm, Paul King wrote:
I was surprised to see binary jars in the src archives under lib/optional.
I don't know the history, so perhaps it is fine.
Thank you for testing this release. I had a look at our previous
releases and they too contain the binary jars in the s
Revision 21 in latest/candidate
> >
> > This release is mainly a bug fix release and the exact changes are noted
> > in
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/RELEASE-NOTES-1.10.12.html.
> > Of particular interest is the relatively minor bug fix in the javadoc
x release and the exact changes are noted
> in
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/RELEASE-NOTES-1.10.12.html.
> Of particular interest is the relatively minor bug fix in the javadoc
> task which is necessary for it to work properly in the recently released
> Java 17 version.
>
> T
.html.
Of particular interest is the relatively minor bug fix in the javadoc
task which is necessary for it to work properly in the recently released
Java 17 version.
This vote will be open at least for 72 hours and close no earlier than
4th October 2021 03:00 AM UTC (given that it's a week
I'll need one more PMC member's vote on this for me to move forward.
Anyone have some time this week to test this?
-Jaikiran
On 03/10/21 3:23 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2021-09-30, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
This release is mainly a bug fix release and the exact changes are
note
On 2021-09-30, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> This release is mainly a bug fix release and the exact changes are
> noted in
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/RELEASE-NOTES-1.10.12.html. Of
> particular interest is the relatively minor bug fix in the javadoc
> task which is necessary for it to wo
Hi.
On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 2:28 PM Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> +1
>
> - Downloaded the .tar.gz binary
>
Please not that the ASF nor its projects release Binaries.
(They are provided to users as a convenience)
We also do not vote on releases based on Binaries.
The vote should be based o
or it to work properly in the recently
released Java 17 version.
This vote will be open at least for 72 hours and close no earlier than
4th October 2021 03:00 AM UTC (given that it's a weekend in the next
couple of days, I decided to extend the voting period till Monday)
ch is necessary for it to work properly in the recently released
Java 17 version.
This vote will be open at least for 72 hours and close no earlier than
4th October 2021 03:00 AM UTC (given that it's a weekend in the next
couple of days, I decided to extend the voting period till Monday)
With +1s by
Martijn Kruithof
Jaikiran Pai
Maarten Coene
Stefan Bodewig
the vote has passed, I'll publish the artifacts and after the mirrors
had time to catch up will annpunce the release.
Thanks to all who have verified the artifacts
S
+1
Maarten
Op zaterdag 10 juli 2021 20:51:38 CEST schreef Stefan Bodewig
:
Hi all
I've created a release candidate for 1.10.11:
git tag: ANT_1.10.11_RC1
on commit: 01ce0c3b1
tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/
revision: 48767
Maven artifacts:
+1
Tested on our build infrastructure, no issues found.
Maarten
Op zaterdag 10 juli 2021 20:14:36 CEST schreef Stefan Bodewig
:
[re-send with fixed subject, sorry]
Hi all
I've created a release candidate for 1.9.16:
git tag: ANT_1.9.16_RC1
on commit: ea698c454
tarballs: ht
making my own +1 explicit
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
making my own +1 explicit
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
+1.
Downloaded .tar.gz binary. Checked some manuals and the NOTICE file.
Used this version to build some of our internal projects. All went fine.
-Jaikiran
On 10/07/21 11:43 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
I've created a release candidate for 1.9.16:
git tag: ANT_1.9.16_RC1
on c
+1.
Downloaded the .tar.gz binary, checked the NOTICE file, some manuals and
built our internal projects using this new version. All went fine.
-Jaikiran
On 11/07/21 12:21 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all
I've created a release candidate for 1.10.11:
git tag: ANT_1.10.11_RC1
on c
Hi
I Reviewed the changes.
If the
https://github.com/apache/ant/blob/master/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/UnknownElement.java
changes address an Time Of Destruction / Time of Use issue it should
work. If "realThing" is created / changed from another threat the
changes (or even the initial ob
Reviewed changes
+1
br Martijn Kruithof
Op 10/07/2021 om 20:13 schreef Stefan Bodewig:
Hi all
I've created a release candidate for 1.9.16:
git tag: ANT_1.9.16_RC1
on commit: ea698c454
tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/
revision: 48766
Maven artifacts:
Hi all
I've created a release candidate for 1.10.11:
git tag: ANT_1.10.11_RC1
on commit: 01ce0c3b1
tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/
revision: 48767
Maven artifacts:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheant-1049/org/apache/ant
[re-send with fixed subject, sorry]
Hi all
I've created a release candidate for 1.9.16:
git tag: ANT_1.9.16_RC1
on commit: ea698c454
tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/
revision: 48766
Maven artifacts:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositori
Hi all
I've created a release candidate for 1.9.16:
git tag: ANT_1.9.16_RC1
on commit: ea698c454
tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/
revision: 48766
Maven artifacts:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheant-1049/org/apache/ant/
Hi all
with +1s by Jaikiran Pai, Maarten Coene, Jan Materne, Martijn Kruithof
and myself and no other votes the vote has passed.
I'll publish the artifacts now and send out the announcement / update
the site later today.
Many thanks to all who evaluated the release
S
I completely forgot to vote myself.
+1
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
.
Notwithstanding +1
Br Martijn
Op 04/07/2021 om 14:54 schreef apa...@materne.de:
Downloaded src+bin.zip and did some tests. All fine.
+1
Jan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Maarten Coene
Gesendet: Sonntag, 4. Juli 2021 12:17
An: Ant Developers List
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache
Downloaded src+bin.zip and did some tests. All fine.
+1
Jan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Maarten Coene
Gesendet: Sonntag, 4. Juli 2021 12:17
An: Ant Developers List
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AntUnit 1.4.1 based on RC1
+1
Maarten
Op zaterdag 3 juli 2021 14:41:50 CEST
Maven artifacts:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheant-1048/org/apache/ant/ant-antunit/1.4.1/
This Vote will be open at least for 72 hours and close no earlier than
2021-07-06 13:00UTC.
Cheers
S
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/antlibs/antunit/
revision: 48645
Maven artifacts:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheant-1048/org/apache/ant/ant-antunit/1.4.1/
This Vote will be open at least for 72 hours and close no earlier than
2021-07-06 13:00UTC.
C
-1048/org/apache/ant/ant-antunit/1.4.1/
This Vote will be open at least for 72 hours and close no earlier than
2021-07-06 13:00UTC.
Cheers
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For addit
1 - 100 of 2425 matches
Mail list logo
