> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 28 September 2003 19:46
> To: Philip Aston
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] JUnit task - forking only once for a batch
>
>
> On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Philip Aston wr
> -Original Message-
> From: Philip Aston
> Sent: 28 September 2003 15:49
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: [PATCH] JUnit task - forking only once for a batch
>
> Patch and new file attached f
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Philip Aston wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Philip Aston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > and would they like
This syntax seems better to me.
> > > Patch and new file attached for consideration.
I suspect that the listserv dropped both.
> > >
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 28 September 2003 18:23
> To: Philip Aston
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] JUnit task - forking only once for a batch
>
>
> On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Philip Aston wrote
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Philip Aston wrote:
> > > On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Philip Aston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > and would they like
> > >
> > > I'd like to see it, at least.
> > >
> >
> > OK, I'll cut a patch at the weekend.
>
> Patch and new file attached for consideration. Examp
> -Original Message-
> From: Philip Aston
> Sent: 25 September 2003 22:50
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: JUnit task - forking only once for a batch
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 25 September 2003 09:38
>
