Re: Vote to promote VSS antlib out of sandbox

Hi all, http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/antlibs/vss/ We now have a promoted vss antlib. I've also updated the xdocs to reflect this, but I'm unsure about the correct steps to publish changes to the site. Thanks to Stefan for promote.xml - the largest portion of the time was taken up with me no

Re: openhatch

Hi, > Wouldn't this imply we have open issues that are good candidates for > people who want to get their feet wet with open source software (we > likely have) and have experienced developers around who are available to > mentor said people? > > If this is true, I'd encourage the potential mentors

Re: Vote to promote VSS antlib out of sandbox

Hi, On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Bruce Atherton wrote: >  We've already had a vote on this which passed. > http://marc.info/?l=ant-dev&m=127697274731069&w=2 > > I'd change point c to just removing the old code from core. Good point I forgot that VSS was wrapped up in that vote Kev

Re: Vote to promote VSS antlib out of sandbox

We've already had a vote on this which passed. http://marc.info/?l=ant-dev&m=127697274731069&w=2 I'd change point c to just removing the old code from core. On 31/08/2010 5:33 PM, Kevin Jackson wrote: c: vote to remove the old vss code from core/trunk (as it won't be needed) -

Re: openhatch

On 2010-08-28, Kevin Jackson wrote: > http://openhatch.org/ > This is a community site for all open source projects - do you think > it would be valuable to add the ant bugzilla to this? Wouldn't this imply we have open issues that are good candidates for people who want to get their feet wet wi

Re: Vote to promote VSS antlib out of sandbox

On 2010-09-01, Kevin Jackson wrote: > I have the day off tomorrow (Vietnamese Independence Day), so I will > get working on moveing the codebase from sandbox to antlibs proper > (this is were I screw up svn :) may help - it expect