Re: [DISCUSS] Commercial Tasks in Ant

Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2010-05-29, Bruce Atherton wrote: > > >> I'd like to discuss whether to move all of the commercial tasks out of >> Ant core/optional libraries and putting them each into their own >> Antlibs. >> > > +1 - I'm not sure we must stop at the commercial task (is there a

Re: Sometime making jar takes long time

SHAILJA, this really is a question for the user list, not the dev list. On 2010-06-01, SHAILJA wrote: > I have simple build.xml file to make jar only > > > basedir="/u/kumari/main/base/java/classes" > includes="common/**"/> > > basedir="/u/kumari/main/base/java/classes/common" a

Re: [DISCUSS] Commercial Tasks in Ant

On 2010-05-29, Bruce Atherton wrote: > I'd like to discuss whether to move all of the commercial tasks out of > Ant core/optional libraries and putting them each into their own > Antlibs. +1 - I'm not sure we must stop at the commercial task (is there any reason to include the CVS tasks with Ant

Sometime making jar takes long time

Hi All, During our day to day jobs, I see lot of difference in time taken by making jar on different hosts. I have simple build.xml file to make jar only = I used "ant-1.7.1/bin/ant jar" to make jar files. And I see three different time taken on three different i386 ho

Re: Ant @ Hudson

On 2010-05-30, Jan Matèrne wrote: > For a long while the Ant tests are failing at Hudson. At the moment > there are multiple reasons, but the biggest one is the JarSigner. I'm not sure my interoretation of the Hudson pages i correct but does the history say all tests have passed in build 179? I

Re: System.getenv vs Ant 1.8.1's Execute

On 2010-05-31, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > in [1] you'll > find a simple command line tool that compares env variables between Ant > 1.8.1's code base and System.getenv. This has further been simplified, just download

Re: System.getenv vs Ant 1.8.1's Execute

I've opened Bugzilla Issue 49366 to track this and related issues. On 2010-05-31, Maarten Coene wrote: > If the difference would be a problem, maybe we could ignore the > environment variables starting with '=' on windows? I'm not sure the difference itself would be a problem. Environment varia

Re: System.getenv vs Ant 1.8.1's Execute

On 2010-06-01, Xavier Hanin wrote: > I got no problem and no difference on my Mac: Thank you for checking. I forgot to say so but the same is true for Linux (at least the Ubuntu/OpenJDK combination I've tried) and Solaris. > env $ java -version > java version "1.6.0_17" > Java(TM) SE Runtime En

Re: System.getenv vs Ant 1.8.1's Execute

Hi, I got no problem and no difference on my Mac: env $ java -jar build/lib/ant-usertests.env-0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar Detected OS_NAME: mac os x Detected OS_ARCH: x86_64 Detected OS_VERSION: 10.5.8 Both methods returned the same environment information env $ java -version java version "1.6.0_17" Ja