>We could have dummy jar's for dependences.
>Peter
You could use https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/sandbox/mocks ;-)
Jan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.a
On 2010-05-17, Jesse Glick wrote:
> Still not clear to me whether there is a (nonhistorical) reason for
> maintaining ant.jar and ant-nodeps.jar as distinct. Stefan seems to
> say there is not;
At least I'm not aware of any. If we change the packaging it will cause
changes for re-packagers so w
On 2010-05-17, Bruce Atherton wrote:
> BTW, I have access to VSS now, so you can count on me for a +1 if
> there is another vote to move it to an Antlib.
There already is an antlib in the sandbox, I'm not sure whether there
have been changes that haven't been merged after the initial vote
failed
Hi,
Jesse Glick wrote:
> Should the Ant source tree (src/main/ and perhaps also src/tests/) be
> split into subtrees?
>
> [ ] No, leave it the way it is - one big tree, using to
> conditionally compile pieces and route classes to various JARs.
>
> [ x] Yes, split it into subtrees, where each tree
Should the Ant source tree (src/main/ and perhaps also src/tests/) be split
into subtrees?
[ ] No, leave it the way it is - one big tree, using to
conditionally compile pieces and route classes to various JARs.
[ ] Yes, split it into subtrees, where each tree maps to an output JAR, may
have
On 05/17/2010 04:49 PM, Bruce Atherton wrote:
JAI appears to be available through maven now
Or directly from its websites:
https://jai.dev.java.net/binary-builds.html
https://jai-imageio.dev.java.net/binary-builds.html
We would just need to
modify fetch.xml to get it directly. If there are n
Bruce Atherton wrote:
> Also BTW, why aren't NetREXX and JAI available through fetch.xml? JAI
> appears to be available through maven now[1]. There is an ftp-able
> file on IBM for NetREXX[2], and I see nothing in the license[3] to
> suggest that downloading it directly would be a problem. We woul
On 16/05/2010 9:35 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
If you wanted to merge ant.jar with ant-nodeps.jar (which would be fine
with me) we should probably move all tasks included from optional to
core inside the manual as well since the distinction would make even
less sense after that.
+1. Then the
Oh boy, was I ever confused. Thanks for the clarification.
On 16/05/2010 4:52 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Bruce, I believe that Jesse meant something like "One jar should be
built from each source root". In fact his proposition does not change
the number of jars produced in the ant distribu
On 05/16/2010 07:52 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
I believe that Jesse meant something like "One jar should be
built from each source root". In fact his proposition does not change
the number of jars produced in the ant distribution and their contents.
Correct, this would only be a change in
10 matches
Mail list logo
