On 05/16/2010 07:52 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
I believe that Jesse meant something like "One jar should be
built from each source root". In fact his proposition does not change
the number of jars produced in the ant distribution and their contents.
Correct, this would only be a change in source layout. I will send out a vote
about this soon, since people's preferences on the subject differ.
My comments about third-party libraries should perhaps have been put in a separate thread since that is a more or less orthogonal issue. I was not aware of (or had
forgotten) fetch.xml; that should be helpful.
Still not clear to me whether there is a (nonhistorical) reason for maintaining ant.jar and ant-nodeps.jar as distinct. Stefan seems to say there is not; Antoine only
referred to the historical development. The question comes down to whether the distinction between "core" vs. "optional" tasks is still important independently of
third-party library dependencies. Again this should be considered an independent topic, as they could be merged with or without a change in source layout.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
