By me the test fails on both machines.
Jan
Windows XP SP3
---
>>>svn update
Revision 938324.
>>>build -Dtestcase=taskdefs\move-test.xml test
dump-sys-properties:
[echo] java.vm.info=mixed mode
[echo] java.vm.name=Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM
[echo] java.vm
On 2010-04-26, Mark Salter wrote:
> Perhaps the result of running the specific test on xp would have been
> better information to share.
move-test (see subject ;-)
To be more concrete: test-move-caseonly in
src/tests/antunit/taskdefs/move-test.xml in Ant's code base started
failing for me when
On 26/04/2010 14:26, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> "abc" has to exist, does it in your testcase?
No it didn't exists, I simply coded:-
if (new File("c:\\abc.txt").equals(new File("c:\\ABC.txt"))){
System.out.println("Equals");
} else {
System.out.println("NOT Equ
On 2010-04-26, Mark Salter wrote:
> On 26/04/2010 13:41, Matt Benson wrote:
>> Later today I can verify what was returned on XP for new
>> File("abc").equals(new File("ABC")) .
> Returns true on XP here.
"abc" has to exist, does it in your testcase?
If so I wonder how the test has ever passed
On 2010-04-26, Matt Benson wrote:
> I'm not sure. We probably need to do a little more testing but I'm on
> OSX right now and don't have any Win7 system at my disposal. Later
> today I can verify what was returned on XP for new
> File("abc").equals(new File("ABC")) .
I've attached a patch to B
On 26/04/2010 13:41, Matt Benson wrote:
> Later today I can verify what was returned on XP for new
> File("abc").equals(new File("ABC")) .
Returns true on XP here.
java version "1.6.0_20"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_20-b02)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 16.3-b01, mixed mode)
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2010-04-23, Martijn Kruithof wrote:
I agree, however it may be good to update the 1.8.0 manual with a
warning that the behavior is currently not as intended and will
change, published as soon as the solution is changed.
The manual is a tagged svn revisio.
Gi
Dominique Devienne wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
[...] You can't extend an imported extension point with a target
from the importing build file (which is the primary use-case, really).
Right.
[...] Personally I think the changed behavior isn't a ba
I'm not sure. We probably need to do a little more testing but I'm on
OSX right now and don't have any Win7 system at my disposal. Later
today I can verify what was returned on XP for new
File("abc").equals(new File("ABC")) .
On 4/25/10, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2010-04-23, Matt Benson wrote
+1 for fixing
Peter
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2010-04-23, Dominique Devienne wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
>>> [...] Personally I think the changed behavior isn't a bad thing, the old
>>> behavior isn't documented and we s
10 matches
Mail list logo
