Re: Giving the improved bzip2 code a second chance?

2009-03-27 Thread Peter Reilly
Excellent. My tests have shown no problems. Peter On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > committed as revision 759138 > > Stefan > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org > For additional

Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.1.0-rc1 Release

2009-03-27 Thread Gilles Scokart
+1, I tested it in our heavy continous build, and it didn't triggered any regression. Thanks to push this out. Gilles Scokart 2009/3/25 Xavier Hanin > +1 > Great work Maarten ! > > Xavier > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Maarten Coene >wrote: > > > > > I have built Ivy 2.1.0-rc1 > > >

Re: Giving the improved bzip2 code a second chance?

2009-03-27 Thread Stefan Bodewig
committed as revision 759138 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

Re: Enhancing eclipse plugins for Ivy and Ant

2009-03-27 Thread Jeffrey E Care
The Ant plugin is core part of Eclipse itself. Siddhartha Purkayastha wrote on 03/27/2009 06:53:02 AM: > I know this is the dev mailing list for IvyDE but, am not sure about Ant. If > this is not the correct place for ant, does someone know where I should be > writing for the Ant plugin?

Enhancing eclipse plugins for Ivy and Ant

2009-03-27 Thread Siddhartha Purkayastha
Hello All, We are trying to build an eclipse plugin for EasyAnt (a new build system based on Ant and Ivy). An EasyAnt project is entirely based on: 1. Ant scripts. 2. Ivy spec files. Thus, meaning that a sensible approach for us to follow may be to build on top of existing Ant and IvyDE plugins

Re: Giving the improved bzip2 code a second chance?

2009-03-27 Thread Martijn Kruithof
+1 from me too, Martijn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

Re: Giving the improved bzip2 code a second chance?

2009-03-27 Thread Peter Reilly
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Kevin Jackson wrote: > Hi, > >> with Ant 1.7.0 we changed the bzip2 code to make it a lot faster and >> reverted the change in 1.7.1 because it was creating corrupt archives. >> >> Meanwhile the Hadoop folks have been using the 1.7.0 code and claim >> they have fou

Re: Giving the improved bzip2 code a second chance?

2009-03-27 Thread Kevin Jackson
Hi, > with Ant 1.7.0 we changed the bzip2 code to make it a lot faster and > reverted the change in 1.7.1 because it was creating corrupt archives. > > Meanwhile the Hadoop folks have been using the 1.7.0 code and claim > they have found and fixed the problem (a single + 1 missing somewhere > IIUC