Stefan Bodewig wrote:
if (!f.getName().equals("package-info.java")) {
continue;
should that test better be case-insensitive?
Should it? I don't know. It seemed to work on XP as is. Would someone really
specifically create a file PACKAGE-INFO.JAVA? Windows does at le
The version is 1.5 - and it is not meant to be replaced!
Peter
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 4:35 PM, wrote:
>> +private static final byte[] PACKAGE_INFO_CLASS_HEADER = {
>> +(byte) 0xca, (byte) 0xfe, (byte) 0xba, (byte) 0xbe,
good idea!
On 2009-02-12, wrote:
>>private void lookForPackageInfos(File srcDir, File[] newFiles) {
>>for (int i = 0; i < newFiles.length; i++) {
>>File f = newFiles[i];
>>if (!f.getName().equals("package-info.java")) {
>>continue;
should that
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 4:35 PM, wrote:
> +private static final byte[] PACKAGE_INFO_CLASS_HEADER = {
> +(byte) 0xca, (byte) 0xfe, (byte) 0xba, (byte) 0xbe, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
> +0x31, 0x00, 0x07, 0x07, 0x00, 0x05, 0x07, 0x00, 0x06, 0x01, 0x00,
> 0x0a,
> +0x53, 0x6f, 0x
On 2009-02-12, pedro surf wrote:
> I believe changing the manifest task to accept a classpathref as a
> parameter or a nested element would be a great change that would
> increase the readability of the build and reduce the amount of code
> necessary to do a simple (and usual) task.
I'd probably
