On 2008-11-28, Jean-Louis BOUDART <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any news on this point?
I've still not seen any argument that convinced me that the naming
rules for should be different, but that's just me.
On the target-group as composite side, I may start to understand it,
but feel that we've b
Any news on this point?
2008/11/24 Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:26 AM, Jean-Louis BOUDART <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > > In addition, as we use target-group to have more "genericity" we
> > doesn't
> > > > want to have prefix on those "generic" targ
I'm +1 for this solution
2008/11/26 Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Bruce Atherton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Or you could just live with the verbosity of the target list, like I did,
> > and use naming conventions in EasyAnt. I'm sure there are many
I can see your point. Perhaps Apache could approach IBM about a free license
for the tool just for such a purpose.Its much better for IBM if Ant has
well-integrated Synergy support.
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 12:46 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What we need is an automatic unit test.
> This requi
What we need is an automatic unit test.
This requires a testbed.
As an AntLib for a very special scm we could live with the fact that not any
committer has access to the scm system. But a few should have. And they should
have a test suite so they can "click a button and get the result".
Jan
>
Well if you'd like to send me your Antlibs, I can do some testing for you
here. We're using Synergy 6.5 SP2 (and we're planning on installing the
first post-SP2 patch next wednesday). Would that be of interest to you?
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 10:39 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are using Syn
We are using Synergy 6.5 at the moment and using it since ... mmh ... 5.1? 4.5?
With 6.5 Synergy has a Java client (ok present in 6.1 also), but sadly no real
and open "API" so these tasks wrap the command line client.
As often with scm tasks a test environment for unit tests is difficult ...
J
Seems like a good idea; although the beta was perfectly fine on my
machine (Eclipse 3.4.1).
Regards,
Erik-Berndt
On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 17:14 +0100, Nicolas Lalevée wrote:
> Thanks to some early testers on the ivy-user mailing list [1], they
> spotted an incompatibility of the IvyDE updatesite
Sounds good. I haven't started working on them yet, but I'd probably be
enhancing the existing tasks a little (as they're still relevant) and adding
one or two new tasks.I'll post back here once I have something to show.
Are you also using Synergy at your workplace, or was the antlib for
something
Maarten Coene a écrit :
I'm getting an error when trying to update the already installed IvyDE plugin.
I'm using Eclipse 3.4.0 and tried both
http://people.apache.org/~hibou/staging/updatesite and
http://people.apache.org/~hibou/test-updatesite/
This is the information I could find in the Ecli
10 matches
Mail list logo
