On 2008-11-28, Jean-Louis BOUDART <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any news on this point?
I've still not seen any argument that convinced me that the naming rules for <include> should be different, but that's just me. On the target-group as composite side, I may start to understand it, but feel that we've been tackling the wrong way. Instead of madifying depends, target-group should have a parts attribute that targets can append to. Or something like that. I haven't made up my mind on any of this. But like I said, it is just me, don't wait for me. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
