Re: EasyAnt project

On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Your example would read just as well, if not better, written as > I agree. I think part of the reason for the name "phase" is that it is used to create a concept similar to Maven phases in EasyAnt. Still, we should choose

Re: EasyAnt project

On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Jean-Louis BOUDART <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/10/27 Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > - introduce "phase" concept : A kind of target that contains >> > *ONLY*dependencies, >> >> I'm not good at names. I understand why this is a good name in the >> context of E

Re: Why doesn't Target extend ProjectComponent?

On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Looks like it would be safe to do so... anyone? I don't think there was any reason beyond that it may make people expect something special if you nest targets into targets. I'm not sure whether ProjectHelper2 contains any special hand

[VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-rc2 Release

I have built a second release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0 You can download it from this URL: http://people.apache.org/~maartenc/ivy/staging/2.0.0-rc2/ A maven 2 staging repo with this release is available here: http://people.apache.org/~maartenc/m2-staging-repo/ A staging eclipse update site with th

Why doesn't Target extend ProjectComponent?

Looks like it would be safe to do so... anyone? -Matt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: EasyAnt project

On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Jean-Louis BOUDART <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/10/27 Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> I'm not good at names. I understand why this is a good name in the >> context of EasyAnt but struggle with the same name when applied to >> "pure" Ant. >> >> I recall

Re: EasyAnt project

2008/10/27 Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I've given in and used my googlemail account for the easyant group, > grmbl. Nice :) "Google 1 vs Stefan Bodewig 0 Round 2... Fight !" > > I'll look through the patch and will comment/start new threads for > them later (maybe more than just a bi

Re: extended xslt task - use URIResolvers to create DependSet

Hi again, What do you think about using a xml cache file like below (xml instance followed by XML schema). Since the same XSL (xsl:include/ xsl:import) and XML (from the doc/document function) files can be used in several different, it would make sense to allow the cache file to be reused

Re: Where next: 1.7.2 or 1.8.0?

On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are there any defects so traumatic in Ant 1.7.1 that an urgent fix > is needed? traumatic is a strong word. See yourself

Re: Where next: 1.7.2 or 1.8.0?

Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi, the current trunk doesn't contain many big or risky changes, the biggest new things probably are the changed PropertyHelper[1], FileProvider and local properties. I seriously consider adding the changes made by the EasyAnt proposal. OTOH trunk contains a bunch of bug

AW: How to build ANT from its source code

http://ant.apache.org/manual/install.html#buildingant Jan >-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Von: raj_sharath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. Oktober 2008 07:30 >An: dev@ant.apache.org >Betreff: How to build ANT from its source code > > >Hi- > >for my purposes i have modifie