Re: File Name wiht NLS Special Characters

2008-09-05 Thread rjack2
Folks, After Stefan pointed out that Ant has it's own Apt task I seem to have this working. I've created a target that includes the apt tasks below. I had to break my "Beans" out individually because my web methods throws "Exception" and the task can not seem to overwrite the generated Exception

AW: and basedir

2008-09-05 Thread Jan.Materne
> One thing I think matters is that complex builds work under eclipse. > Right now if you build stuff with it doesnt. I don't think this > is basedir related, but more the way import doesnt use it... We use MyEclipse 6.0 (based on Eclipse 3.3) and have a construct

Re: and basedir

2008-09-05 Thread Steve Loughran
Dominique Devienne wrote: On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Now if only would work the same ;-) We disagree here. Definitely. Just the fact that you documented the whole mess about <*ant*>'s basedir nightmare is enough of a hint to me that not doing t

Re: DirectoryScanner and Symlinks

2008-09-05 Thread Gilles Scokart
2008/9/5 Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> 2008/9/5 Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Is it not costly (as in very costly) to get the canonical path ? >>

Re: DirectoryScanner and Symlinks

2008-09-05 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/9/5 Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Is it not costly (as in very costly) to get the canonical path ? >> >> That's what I've been told but I've never measur

Re: DirectoryScanner and Symlinks

2008-09-05 Thread Gilles Scokart
2008/9/5 Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Is it not costly (as in very costly) to get the canonical path ? > > That's what I've been told but I've never measured it. > > Currently DirectoryScanner avoids looking at the canonical