Re: netrexx and image optional tasks

2008-03-28 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
I think that the image dependent tasks should be moved to a separate antlib. And the NetRexx tasks I wonder whether we should go on maintaining them. I never saw anything mentioning that they are used at all. Regards, Antoine Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Sat, 22 Mar 2008, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL P

Re: Ivy settings id (was Re: Merge 641903 from trunk to 1.7 branch?)

2008-03-28 Thread Dominique Devienne
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can't we just deprecate the "id" attribute on the settings task and use the > settingsId attribute instead? id is handled by Ant itself, in the core. I don't think you can deprecate it. And that doesn't change the fact t

Re: Ivy settings id (was Re: Merge 641903 from trunk to 1.7 branch?)

2008-03-28 Thread Maarten Coene
Can't we just deprecate the "id" attribute on the settings task and use the settingsId attribute instead? instead of Maarten - Original Message From: Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Ant Developers List Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 4:31:42 PM Subject: Ivy settings id (was Re:

cleanup Ivy DependencyResolver interface

2008-03-28 Thread Maarten Coene
Hi, after my changes to fix IVY-716, the following methods on DependencyResolver are no longer used: String[] listTokenValues(String token, Map otherTokenValues); OrganisationEntry[] listOrganisations(); ModuleEntry[] listModules(OrganisationEntry org); RevisionEntry[] listRevisions(ModuleEntry

Re: Ivy settings id (was Re: Merge 641903 from trunk to 1.7 branch?)

2008-03-28 Thread Dominique Devienne
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Yes, you're right. So I agree that to be really clean and follow the Ant > way, settings should be a data type and we should support the three kind

Re: Ivy settings id (was Re: Merge 641903 from trunk to 1.7 branch?)

2008-03-28 Thread Xavier Hanin
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > [...] In Ivy original design I tried to make using Ivy > > as easy as possible. Hence if you want to use the default settings, and > ha

Re: Ivy settings id (was Re: Merge 641903 from trunk to 1.7 branch?)

2008-03-28 Thread Dominique Devienne
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] In Ivy original design I tried to make using Ivy > as easy as possible. Hence if you want to use the default settings, and have > an ivy file called ivy.xml in your basedir, then using Ivy is as simple as: > > >

Re: Ivy settings id (was Re: Merge 641903 from trunk to 1.7 branch?)

2008-03-28 Thread Xavier Hanin
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > For the record, I think it's bad Ant style to use ids i

Re: Ivy settings id (was Re: Merge 641903 from trunk to 1.7 branch?)

2008-03-28 Thread Dominique Devienne
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For the record, I think it's bad Ant style to use ids in tasks. [...] > > I think we use that bad pattern. We've been wondering about the best fo

JIRA notifications

2008-03-28 Thread Xavier Hanin
Hi, A user just complained about not being able to receive notifications of comments on JIRA issue while being a watcher of the issue. I made a test myself on the same issue, and I didn't get the notification either. I've tried to check the configuration for Ivy project in JIRA, I see the notifica

Ivy settings id (was Re: Merge 641903 from trunk to 1.7 branch?)

2008-03-28 Thread Xavier Hanin
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > +1 for me as well (let's put a little bit more presure

Re: [Vote] 1.7.1beta2

2008-03-28 Thread Dominique Devienne
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Congratulations on doing the release Kevin, Yep, I second that. Thanks Kev! --DD - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional comma

Re: Merge 641903 from trunk to 1.7 branch?

2008-03-28 Thread Dominique Devienne
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 for me as well (let's put a little bit more presure from the Ivy guys > ;-). > > > > To come back to the impact on Ivy, I think we should

Re: Merge 641903 from trunk to 1.7 branch?

2008-03-28 Thread Dominique Devienne
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 5:37 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Bugzilla 44689: NPE with multiple targets and id's in task > > IMHO the bug is serious enough to be fixed in 1.7.1 final and should > be merged into the branch. +1. --DD -

RE: Can I Test the NPE Bug?

2008-03-28 Thread Buck, Robert
I just confirmed the fix. It works great. When a new beta/rc is out, I will test the real distribution to confirm once again. Thanks Bob -Original Message- From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 6:53 AM To: Ant Developers List Cc: Buck, Robert Subject:

Re: Merge 641903 from trunk to 1.7 branch?

2008-03-28 Thread Xavier Hanin
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 for me as well (let's put a little bit more presure from the Ivy guys > ;-). > > To come back to the impact on Ivy, I think we should put a note in our > doc saying that using the settings task with an id requires 1.7.

Re: Merge 641903 from trunk to 1.7 branch?

2008-03-28 Thread Gilles Scokart
+1 for me as well (let's put a little bit more presure from the Ivy guys ;-). To come back to the impact on Ivy, I think we should put a note in our doc saying that using the settings task with an id requires 1.7.1. Or is there any workaround we could implement in ivy settings task ? Gilles On

Re: Merge 641903 from trunk to 1.7 branch?

2008-03-28 Thread Peter Reilly
+1 from me. Peter On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > >> Author: peterreilly > > >> Date: Thu Mar 27 10:09:53 2008 > > >> New Revision: 641903 >

Re: Merge 641903 from trunk to 1.7 branch?

2008-03-28 Thread Xavier Hanin
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> Author: peterreilly > >> Date: Thu Mar 27 10:09:53 2008 > >> New Revision: 641903 > >> > >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=641903&view=rev > >> Log: > >> Bugzilla 44689: NPE with multipl

Re: Merge 641903 from trunk to 1.7 branch?

2008-03-28 Thread Steve Loughran
Stefan Bodewig wrote: Author: peterreilly Date: Thu Mar 27 10:09:53 2008 New Revision: 641903 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=641903&view=rev Log: Bugzilla 44689: NPE with multiple targets and id's in task IMHO the bug is serious enough to be fixed in 1.7.1 final and should be merged int

Re: Can I Test the NPE Bug?

2008-03-28 Thread Peter Reilly
As far as I am aware, there is currently no nightly build. The easiest way to get a version is to check out the ant trunk and compile it yourself. -> use java5 to have the same compiler as the ant release [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ echo $JAVA_HOME /usr/java/jdk5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ mkdir y [EMAIL PR

Merge 641903 from trunk to 1.7 branch?

2008-03-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig
> Author: peterreilly > Date: Thu Mar 27 10:09:53 2008 > New Revision: 641903 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=641903&view=rev > Log: > Bugzilla 44689: NPE with multiple targets and id's in task IMHO the bug is serious enough to be fixed in 1.7.1 final and should be merged into the branc

Re: Should ScriptRunner call terminate() on the BSFManager?

2008-03-28 Thread Peter Reilly
Please enter a bugzilla bug report for this. It would be nice if the entry contained a tar.gz/or/zip file containing a example jepp usage - with the relevant/needed jar files in a lib directory, and better a use of an ant-contrib loop to cause the problem to happen. and even nicer an simple webte