RE: Ivy 2.0.0 beta2: MakePom Patch (Enhancement)

2008-03-13 Thread Wardrip, Paul
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-770 --pw -Original Message- From: Xavier Hanin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 8:53 AM To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: Ivy 2.0.0 beta2: MakePom Patch (Enhancement) This sounds interesting. Could you open an issue a

Re: Ivy Maven 2 Compatibility

2008-03-13 Thread Gilles Scokart
On 13/03/2008, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Cool, I think we should share those errors with the maven team. They > > usually don't accept to patch meta-data, but when it is invalid XML I > > think they

Re: Ivy Maven 2 Compatibility

2008-03-13 Thread Xavier Hanin
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cool, I think we should share those errors with the maven team. They > usually don't accept to patch meta-data, but when it is invalid XML I > think they would accept. Yes, but we'd need to filter this list first, to gi

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.7.1 beta

2008-03-13 Thread Kevin Jackson
Hi, > so what? > > If I signed it, then a few signatures would be on my key but for the > majority of users there wouldn't be a trust path from them to my key. > > It is better to have signatures on your key, that's sure (and that is > something we can get arranged even without meeting F2F),

Re: Ivy Maven 2 Compatibility

2008-03-13 Thread Gilles Scokart
Cool, I think we should share those errors with the maven team. They usually don't accept to patch meta-data, but when it is invalid XML I think they would accept. Concerning the comparision with the maven resultion I started a few month ago (during javapolis) to write some tests to compare trans

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.7.1 beta

2008-03-13 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > >> Any reason why you can't create a key for yourself? > > My key isn't counter-signed so anything I sign will be 'untrusted' > :( so what? If I signed it, then a few signatures would be on my key but for the majority of us

Re: Ivy 2.0.0 beta2: MakePom Patch (Enhancement)

2008-03-13 Thread Xavier Hanin
This sounds interesting. Could you open an issue and attach your patch to it? Xavier On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:08 PM, Wardrip, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I am working on a new build process for my company using Ivy and an Archiva > (Maven2 based) repository. I use the Ibiblio resolv

Re: Ivy 2.0.0 beta2: MakePom Patch (Enhancement)

2008-03-13 Thread Tony Sweeney
On Mar 12, 2008, at 10:08 PM, Wardrip, Paul wrote: I am working on a new build process for my company using Ivy and an Archiva (Maven2 based) repository. I use the Ibiblio resolver to read and SFTP to publish. SFTP is not ideal, but I read that webdav support was currently broken in Ivy 2.