On 13/03/2008, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Cool, I think we should share those errors with the maven team. They > > usually don't accept to patch meta-data, but when it is invalid XML I > > think they would accept. > > Yes, but we'd need to filter this list first, to give them only a list > with really invalid data. > > > > > > Concerning the comparision with the maven resultion I started a few > > month ago (during javapolis) to write some tests to compare transitive > > dependencies. I tested it on a local repository (very small), but I > > found some differences. That resulted in a few jira tickets that have > > been fixed in 2.0-beta2. (I also found some strange behavior in > > maven). > > > > I plan to relaunch this comparison as soon as I find some free time > > (that will not happen soon :-( ). > > I'd be interested in the scripts you use to make the comparison > I'm afraid it is too dirty to be shared. It is better to throw it away and restart from scratch. It is actually a java application written on top of the ivy and some maven component (of an unknow version). I think I will rewrite it as a script using 'mvn dependency:tree' and an ivy report. That would be cleaner, and more easily extensible (for example to compare with buildr experimental transitive dependencies).
-- Gilles Scokart --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
