Re: vote: Remove javadoc2 for 1.8?

On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In an effort to start trimming the deprecated fat from Ant for the > next release, I'd like to propose that the task bin > consigned to the dustbin of history and the docs be updated. > > - I can't even find the code in the source t

Re: per-task diagnostics

On Wed, 07 Feb 2007, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been thinking about how we could improve our diagnostics, by > moving more of the diags into tasks themselves. Every task could > have a diagnostics(PrintStream) method that would be called to do > the diags. I think it should

Re: DSL

On 2/7/07, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Matt Benson wrote: > All right... maybe I _am_ ready to prototype this > thing (see the userlist if you're not up to speed). I > finally came up with a name I like, so maybe that's a > sign. > > So what's the deal with starting a sandbox Antli

Ant 1.7.0 Maven2 repo version has problem

Hi, The version of 1.7.0 at the maven2 repo seems to have a problem. my pom : org.apache.ant ant [1.7.0,) org.apache.ant ant-jsch [1.7.0,) When I use my maven plugin (which relies on these dependencies) I get a URL error in ${user.home}/.m2/repository/org/apache/ant

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41544] - Replace task summary output incorrect

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41597] New: - and other script tasks should work from resources

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: DSL

On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Feel free to improve it ;-) > > Actually that was another question on my part--the > "officialness" of the charter. We should probably vote on the changes via lazy consensus in the en

Re: DSL

On Wed, 07 Feb 2007, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > speaking of stuff in the sandbox, has anyone looked at the http > stuff in there? Not at all. And right now I'm even more burried in work than I imagined two weeks ago, so no hope for now, sorry. Do you consider it stable? Stefan

Re: Playing with annotations for Ant - Sandboxable or not?

On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I had an idea to try out using annotations in Ant - starting with a > simple @Validation for fields. > > I know this can't be put in trunk for bwc reasons, but is it the > sort of thing that should be considered for the sandbox? Abs

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41596] - ant 1.7 tar and bzip2 tasks corrupted output file when size exceeds certain limit

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41596] New: - ant 1.7 tar and bzip2 tasks corrupted output file when size exceeds certain limit

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41579] - Launch.run() fails when ant-launcher.jar is in the root of a drive

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41594] - Harden Ant to cope with null system properties

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r506547 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/PropertyHelper.java

Author: peterreilly Date: Mon Feb 12 09:42:32 2007 New Revision: 506547 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=506547 Log: Bugzilla: 41594 copy setnewproperty sanity protection to setproperty Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/PropertyHelper.java Modified: ant/cor

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41594] - Harden Ant to cope with null system properties

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41594] New: - Harden Ant to cope with null system properties

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Playing with annotations for Ant - Sandboxable or not?

Kevin Jackson wrote: Hi all, I had an idea to try out using annotations in Ant - starting with a simple @Validation for fields. I know this can't be put in trunk for bwc reasons, but is it the sort of thing that should be considered for the sandbox? 1. yes, for the sandbox 2. Testng uses som

AW: Playing with annotations for Ant - Sandboxable or not?

>I had an idea to try out using annotations in Ant - starting with a >simple @Validation for fields. > >I know this can't be put in trunk for bwc reasons, but is it the sort >of thing that should be considered for the sandbox? Annotations could make life easier, indeed. Maybe via a Java5Helper?

AW: Value of the property is not visible in the imported build file.

>In my custom ant task, I set the value of a getter method to a >property, and I can refer this property value using ${somevariable} in >the build.xml, but when I try to access this property value in the same >way in another build file which is imported in the previous build file, >it does not re

Playing with annotations for Ant - Sandboxable or not?

Hi all, I had an idea to try out using annotations in Ant - starting with a simple @Validation for fields. I know this can't be put in trunk for bwc reasons, but is it the sort of thing that should be considered for the sandbox? Kev -

Re: vote: Remove javadoc2 for 1.8?

Kevin Jackson wrote: Hi all, In an effort to start trimming the deprecated fat from Ant for the next release, I'd like to propose that the task bin consigned to the dustbin of history and the docs be updated. My rational for this: - personally I've never used it - it's been deprecated since be

AW: per-task diagnostics

>I've been thinking about how we could improve our diagnostics, >by moving >more of the diags into tasks themselves. Every task could have a >diagnostics(PrintStream) method that would be called to do the diags. > >With this the -diagnostics routine could run through all tasks that it >knows ab