Re: mapper refid

On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Currently, > > > > > doesn't work, because expects its refid > always to point to a . Should the above > example work? Yes, I think it should. > Further, should(n't) e.g. globmapper support a refid > as well? +1 Stefan ---

Re: classloader for 1.7

On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > manipulations, for 1.7.0. Are there still objections > before I do this with lazy consensus? like Peter I recall we decided against oing this for 1.7.0. Stefan - To

Re: javax scripting for ant 1.7.0

On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to propose to have an initial implemenation > with language="javascript" just using the bsf engine. > and "jsr:javascript" to denote the javax.script. > > This will I think allow use of javax.scripting without > having a

Re: ConditionBase.java patch for supporting description attribute

Any opinions on pushing the descriptin attribute from Task to ProjectComponent? Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: .ant/lib at project level

On Thu, 23 Nov 2006, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I then had a brainwave, why not have a .ant/lib directory > in the project directory (defined as the directory > that contains the build file). I can see how this would be useful. OTOH I fear that would be too much magic. You could

Re: build date for Ant 1.7.0

As regards the prefix versus attribute debate, I would prefer to use a prefix. (1) print("Hello world\n"); (2) print("Hello world\n"); (1) is I think nicer. The reason I don't like (1) is that it makes it look like an XML namespace prefix, while it's n

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41086] - copy with filter fails on nested substitutions

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: build date for Ant 1.7.0

On 11/30/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I suggested in a previous message that I would build a candidate for Ant 1.7.0 on Sunday, December 10. If the build is accepted the public release would be on Sunday, December 17. Does this suggested build date fit with the vario

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41080] - XmlProperty overrides previously set property value when handling duplicate elements

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r481078 - in /ant/core/trunk: CONTRIBUTORS WHATSNEW contributors.xml src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/XmlProperty.java src/tests/antunit/taskdefs/xmlproperty-test.xml

Author: peterreilly Date: Thu Nov 30 13:03:17 2006 New Revision: 481078 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=481078 Log: BZ:41080 xmlproperty multi-values overwrite properties Modified: ant/core/trunk/CONTRIBUTORS ant/core/trunk/WHATSNEW ant/core/trunk/contributors.xml a

svn commit: r481076 - /ant/core/trunk/src/tests/antunit/taskdefs/xmlproperty.multi.xml

Author: peterreilly Date: Thu Nov 30 12:56:49 2006 New Revision: 481076 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=481076 Log: eol-style Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/tests/antunit/taskdefs/xmlproperty.multi.xml (contents, props changed) Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/tests/antunit/taskd

svn commit: r481074 - /ant/core/trunk/src/tests/antunit/taskdefs/xmlproperty.multi.xml

Author: peterreilly Date: Thu Nov 30 12:55:22 2006 New Revision: 481074 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=481074 Log: added for multi value xmlproperty test Added: ant/core/trunk/src/tests/antunit/taskdefs/xmlproperty.multi.xml Added: ant/core/trunk/src/tests/antunit/taskdefs/xm

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41090] New: - jsch-0.1.30 causes SCP task to hang

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41086] - copy with filter fails on nested substitutions

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r481041 - in /ant/core/trunk: WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/FilterSet.java src/tests/antunit/types/filterset-test.xml

Author: mbenson Date: Thu Nov 30 11:11:04 2006 New Revision: 481041 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=481041 Log: fix NPE in recursive filtering. BZ 41086. Added: ant/core/trunk/src/tests/antunit/types/filterset-test.xml (with props) Modified: ant/core/trunk/WHATSNEW an

svn commit: r481037 - /ant/core/trunk/WHATSNEW

Author: mbenson Date: Thu Nov 30 11:00:43 2006 New Revision: 481037 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=481037 Log: editing for cleanliness and such Modified: ant/core/trunk/WHATSNEW Modified: ant/core/trunk/WHATSNEW URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/WHATSNEW?view=

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41086] - copy with filter fails on nested substitutions

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41086] New: - copy with filter fails on nested substitutions

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30569] - basedir is not set correctly when calling subant task through ant task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41080] - XmlProperty overrides previously set property value when handling duplicate elements

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

build date for Ant 1.7.0

Hi, I suggested in a previous message that I would build a candidate for Ant 1.7.0 on Sunday, December 10. If the build is accepted the public release would be on Sunday, December 17. Does this suggested build date fit with the various changes that are in the air ? Or should I do it eve

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41080] New: - XmlProperty overrides previously set property value when handling duplicate elements

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Fw: where is wsdl2Java?

Martin Gainty wrote: Hello All- Any suggestions where to locate the axis-ant-plugin jar? sorry, I was confusing. There is a bit in the axis2 source tree called axis-ant-plugin, but I think it creates the ant-codegen.jar file try doing a a taskdef with the task name of org.apache.axis2.tool

AW: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41058] - [PATCH] Support JDK 5 enumerations for attribute values

>Jesse Glick wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems safe and useful for 1.7 . >>> >>> +1 useful: +1, many people are writing on Java5, Java6 is ante portas. >> Any other +/-? It's not really clear to me what, if any, criteria >> there are for RFEs this late in the cycle. I *think* th