DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34138] New: - Ant should use other compilers when Sun's Javac can not be found

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Ant build.xml and batchtest

Also fine by me. Antoine > Currently the batchtest includes **/*Test* . I would > like to add the capability to override this to Ant's > buildfile. The reason I am raising a short discussion > is that the simplest means of doing this would be to > add a property for use by the run-tests target, >

Re: [VOTE] Retire Antidote

+1. Stefan Bodewig wrote: Since Antidote's development has been stalled for a long time now - and there doesn't seem to be a big need for an Ant GUI given the great IDE support we have - I hereby propose to retire the Antidote subproject.

RE: Ant build.xml and batchtest

> From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Currently the batchtest includes **/*Test* . I would > like to add the capability to override this to Ant's > buildfile. The reason I am raising a short discussion > is that the simplest means of doing this would be to > add a property for use by

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34079] - Jar task does not include deeply nested inner classes.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34136] New: - P4Sync.setLabel(null) throws NPE, "" does not behave as expected

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34116] - Example XML syntax for Ant manual + matching XSLs

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Ant build.xml and batchtest

Currently the batchtest includes **/*Test* . I would like to add the capability to override this to Ant's buildfile. The reason I am raising a short discussion is that the simplest means of doing this would be to add a property for use by the run-tests target, without attempting to circumvent or

RE: Prototype work on XML+XSL based Ant doc

> From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I do not want to be too negative but... Well, I did ask for input... It's sometimes painful to get negative feedback, but it's usually constructive. > >2) Second, is the XML syntax I used too verbose? > The xml looks very verbose. It is. I tried

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs SignJar.java

On 22 Mar 2005, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > let's see what gump thinks. Gump currently is disabled during the infra-thon since our infrastructure friends are randomly enabling and disabling stuff. You have modified the indentation of the license, BTW. Stefan

Re: complex signing logic in signjar

It's becoming more and more used. Several projects I've been involved in that use WebStart use . Erik On Mar 22, 2005, at 11:18 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: Stefan Bodewig wrote: Steve, I think signjar is one of the least used tasks in Ant. IIRC we even shipped a version of Ant where signj

Re: Prototype work on XML+XSL based Ant doc

I do not want to be too negative but... Dominique Devienne wrote: I've entered this enhancement. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34116 I have several questions I was hoping could be discussed. 1) First, is there a place for such a prototype somewhere? proposals/ in CVS? Wait for

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks signjar.html

stevel 2005/03/22 09:36:58 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks signjar.html Log: updated docs. left mapper commented out until tests show that it exists :) Revision ChangesPath 1.19 +38 -13ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/signjar.html Index: signjar.html

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs SignJar.java

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: stevel 2005/03/22 09:20:06 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs SignJar.java Log: This is an interim checkin, with new features and some refactoring. All existing (minimal) tests should work, let's see what gump thinks. This is still a work in progre

cvs commit: ant WHATSNEW

stevel 2005/03/22 09:25:19 Modified:.WHATSNEW Log: signjar dependency logic change. Revision ChangesPath 1.789 +8 -0 ant/WHATSNEW Index: WHATSNEW === RCS file: /home/cvs/ant/WHATSNE

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs SignJar.java

stevel 2005/03/22 09:20:06 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs SignJar.java Log: This is an interim checkin, with new features and some refactoring. All existing (minimal) tests should work, let's see what gump thinks. This is still a work in progress... Revision

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34079] - Jar task does not include deeply nested inner classes.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: styletest breaking?

It should break unless you've bootstrapped a new version of Ant, this unit test proves that a certain bug exists. It should not break on a CVS HEAD version of Ant. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additiona

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Task.java

stevel 2005/03/22 08:39:33 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Task.java Log: copy tasktype when binding Revision ChangesPath 1.64 +1 -0 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/Task.java Index: Task.java =

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34079] - Jar task does not include deeply nested inner classes.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34079] - Jar task does not include deeply nested inner classes.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: complex signing logic in signjar

Stefan Bodewig wrote: Steve, I think signjar is one of the least used tasks in Ant. IIRC we even shipped a version of Ant where signjar didn't work at all (I think Ant 1.2) and it took quite some time until anybody complained. Methinks it is kind of underused from the command line too, else the b

styletest breaking?

[junit] Testsuite: org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.StyleTest [junit] Tests run: 10, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 1.099 sec [junit] Testcase: testDirectoryHierarchyWithDirMatching(org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.StyleTest): Caused an ERROR [junit] java.io.FileNotFoundExcepti

Re: complex signing logic in signjar

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -no source file: out of date -source==dest: false or check signature -else: check timestamp maybe if the timestamp check says the destfile is newer than (or as new as) the source then check the signature as well?

Prototype work on XML+XSL based Ant doc

I've entered this enhancement. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34116 I have several questions I was hoping could be discussed. 1) First, is there a place for such a prototype somewhere? proposals/ in CVS? Wait for SVN/ant/sandbox? So far I've just published a zip attached to th

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34116] - Example XML syntax for Ant manual + matching XSLs

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32973] - batchtest does not work well with custom formatter

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: complex signing logic in signjar

On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -no source file: out of date > -source==dest: false or check signature > -else: check timestamp maybe if the timestamp check says the destfile is newer than (or as new as) the source then check the signature as well? Stefan --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34116] - Example XML syntax for Ant manual + matching XSLs

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: complex signing logic in signjar

Steve Loughran wrote: I am reworking signjar to do filesets with dest dirs, and the dependency logic is causing trouble: protected boolean isUpToDate(File jarFile, File signedjarFile) { if (null == jarFile) { return false; } if (null != signedjarFile) {

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34124] - task suggestion

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34124] - task suggestion

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: complex signing logic in signjar

Stefan Bodewig wrote: Steve, I think signjar is one of the least used tasks in Ant. IIRC we even shipped a version of Ant where signjar didn't work at all (I think Ant 1.2) and it took quite some time until anybody complained. On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Why don

Re: complex signing logic in signjar

Steve, I think signjar is one of the least used tasks in Ant. IIRC we even shipped a version of Ant where signjar didn't work at all (I think Ant 1.2) and it took quite some time until anybody complained. On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why dont we do an isSigne

complex signing logic in signjar

I am reworking signjar to do filesets with dest dirs, and the dependency logic is causing trouble: protected boolean isUpToDate(File jarFile, File signedjarFile) { if (null == jarFile) { return false; } if (null != signedjarFile) { if (!jarFile.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34125] - task suggestion

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34124] - task suggestion

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34125] New: - task suggestion

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34124] New: - task suggestion

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34102] - xmlcatalog won't load dtd if the dtd location contains spaces

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32973] - batchtest does not work well with custum formatter

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34079] - Jar task does not include deeply nested inner classes.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34119] - [chmod] Warning: UNIXProcess.forkAndExec native error: The parameter or environment lists are too long.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32973] - batchtest does not work well with custum formatter

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34119] - [chmod] Warning: UNIXProcess.forkAndExec native error: The parameter or environment lists are too long.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/OptionalTasks attrib.html chgrp.html chown.html

On 22 Mar 2005, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > POSIX recommends command line length limits of at least 4096 > characters, this may give you an approximation for the number > you could use as initial value for these experiments. If anybody wants to rephrase this sentence, you're welcome 8-) Also, i

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/OptionalTasks attrib.html chgrp.html chown.html

bodewig 2005/03/22 03:13:11 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH chmod.html docs/manual/OptionalTasks Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH attrib.html chgrp.html chown.html Log: merge Revision ChangesPath No revision N

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/OptionalTasks attrib.html chgrp.html chown.html

bodewig 2005/03/22 03:11:48 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks chmod.html docs/manual/OptionalTasks attrib.html chgrp.html chown.html Log: Hint at maxparallel attribute, PR 34119 Revision ChangesPath 1.21 +11 -0 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/chmod.html

AW: [VOTE] Retire Antidote

> IDE integration is so good these days, our work is done. No - but we have to work on another area :-) Jan

Re: [VOTE] Retire Antidote

Stefan Bodewig wrote: This again is a vote that needs two-third of all active committers, oh my. Since Antidote's development has been stalled for a long time now - and there doesn't seem to be a big need for an Ant GUI given the great IDE support we have - I hereby propose to retire the Antidote s

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25911] - Style tasks directory creation issue

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34116] - Example XML syntax for Ant manual + matching XSLs

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Retire Antidote

Stefan Bodewig wrote: This again is a vote that needs two-third of all active committers, oh my. +1 Conor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

AW: [VOTE] Retire Antidote

+1 Jan > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet am: Montag, 21. März 2005 17:02 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: [VOTE] Retire Antidote > > This again is a vote that needs two-third of all active committers, oh > my. > > Since Antidote's de

Re: [VOTE] Retire Antidote

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I hereby propose to retire the Antidote subproject. + 1 Antoine - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34119] New: - [chmod] Warning: UNIXProcess.forkAndExec native error: The parameter or environment lists are too long.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34116] New: - Example XML syntax for Ant manual + matching XSLs

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34116] - Example XML syntax for Ant manual + matching XSLs

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu