cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs ExecuteJavaTest.java

mbenson 2005/02/24 14:39:27 Modified:src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs ExecuteJavaTest.java Log: Test failed on 1.2 due to ant.home not being set on the helper Project. Revision ChangesPath 1.10 +1 -0 ant/src/testcases/org/apac

cvs commit: ant/xdocs projects.xml

bodewig 2005/02/24 13:03:27 Modified:docs projects.html xdocsprojects.xml Log: Add pointer to Antigen submitted by John Taylor Revision ChangesPath 1.65 +48 -0 ant/docs/projects.html Index: projects.html =

Re: 1.7 release timetable & features.

On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >* to allow adding of jars to the current >classloader (would solve a *lot* of problems at the cost of >some issues) >http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28228 I'm willing to not cast a -1 on it, if it is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28046] - Ant includes JARs in working directory

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: 1.7 release timetable & features.

On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What do people think is a good release schedule/timetable? No argument, although I'd prefer a 1.6.3 release schedule first (and my main issue here would be cutting down open bug reports). > Should we be organised, build up a list o

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22244] - Javadoc Task.. Don't use the JAVADOC exceutable from running VM

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/compilers DefaultCompilerAdapter.java Sj.java

bodewig 2005/02/24 12:25:57 Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/compilers Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH DefaultCompilerAdapter.java Sj.java Log: Merge JDK 1.5 special handling and Symantec fix from HEAD

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/compilers DefaultCompilerAdapter.java Sj.java

bodewig 2005/02/24 12:18:22 Modified:.WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/compilers DefaultCompilerAdapter.java Sj.java Log: debug=false breaks Symantec compiler Revision ChangesPath 1.755 +3 -0 ant/WHATS

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5270] - Ant task - allow multiple targets

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33734] - Ant task should accept more than one target

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33734] New: - Ant task should accept more than one target

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33626] - Uptodate documentation is unclear regarding the comparisons made on files

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks uptodate.html

mbenson 2005/02/24 09:55:57 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH uptodate.html Log: Merge Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.11.2.6 +4 -4 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/uptodate.html Index: uptodate.ht

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks uptodate.html

mbenson 2005/02/24 09:54:21 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks uptodate.html Log: Fixed erroneous statements in documentation. PR: 33626 Revision ChangesPath 1.16 +4 -4 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/uptodate.html Index: uptodate.html ===

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33626] - Uptodate documentation is unclear regarding the comparisons made on files

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33626] - Uptodate documentation is unclear regarding the comparisons made on files

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33626] - Uptodate documentation is unclear regarding the comparisons made on files

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types Path.java

mbenson 2005/02/24 08:48:45 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types Path.java Log: -5 + 2 LOC Revision ChangesPath 1.68 +3 -6 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/Path.java Index: Path.java =

Re: 1.7 release timetable & features.

Dominique Devienne wrote: Given that I don't know the task, it's difficult to gage whether the properties loaded from ${runtime.properties} are used as properties, i.e. the task also supports a or or nested element (e.g. , , , , etc...) turned into a set of properties for the JVM underneath, a

RE: 1.7 release timetable & features.

> From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dominique Devienne wrote: > > I'd like propertyset to stay as a property selector of sort, and not go > > into the realm of actually loading or defining properties. A propertyset > > should stay has a collections of patterns to select existing prop

Re: 1.7 release timetable & features.

Dominique Devienne wrote: From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - a way of embedding files into , so you can do file-based loading from inside anything that takes a property file. Or some easy way of going into Java tasks. I wrote my own element for this for the smartfrog tasks, and it wa

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33732] New: - signjar should support -tsa and -tsacert options

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: AW: 1.7 release timetable & features.

Matt Benson wrote: --- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * local properties for macros (most likely Jose's solution with an auto removal of the local properties at the end of the macro) Do you think the ThreadLocals are just not going to behave themselves? Thread locals can

Re: AW: 1.7 release timetable & features.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - manual needs some pretty generous scrubbing and reorganisation (note: not a fan of any of task styles used...ex. WhichResource) and generally a fresher look and feel. WhichResource is one of the xdoclet generated docs. New velocity/XSLT can improve that. - would like to

Re: 1.7 release timetable & features.

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: you know, this summer will mark the two year point since Ant 1,6.0 shipped. Which means time for Ant1.7 is nearing. Hmm, Ant 1.6.0 has been released in December 2003. OK, I knew it was 2003. That's no so bad...18

Re: 1.7 release timetable & features.

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Darin Swanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Eclipse 3.1 is coming out in June 2005 as Jan indicated. For me to have a chance to update and release Ant 1.7 within Eclipse it would be great to get an Ant release sometime in early May. Otherwise things start

Re: 1.7 release timetable & features.

On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Darin Swanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eclipse 3.1 is coming out in June 2005 as Jan indicated. For me to > have a chance to update and release Ant 1.7 within Eclipse it would > be great to get an Ant release sometime in early May. Otherwise > things start getting locked

Re: AW: 1.7 release timetable & features.

--- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >* local properties for macros (most likely Jose's > solution with >an auto removal of the local properties at > the end of the macro) Do you think the ThreadLocals are just not going to behave themselves? -Matt

Re: 1.7 release timetable & features.

On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > you know, this summer will mark the two year point since Ant 1,6.0 > shipped. Which means time for Ant1.7 is nearing. Hmm, Ant 1.6.0 has been released in December 2003. Stefan --

Re: AW: 1.7 release timetable & features.

I think we should aim to have an ant 1.6.3 release soon, this should include the current fixes and some minor features (-noclasspath for example). and a 1.7 for around the start of summer to include the * * local properties for macros (most likely Jose's solution with an auto removal of

Re: AW: 1.7 release timetable & features.

As the Eclipse Ant integration team lead and not trying to influence your decision but I thought I would give the Eclipse perspective. Eclipse 3.1 is coming out in June 2005 as Jan indicated. For me to have a chance to update and release Ant 1.7 within Eclipse it would be great to get an Ant rel

RE: 1.7 release timetable & features.

> From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - a way of embedding files into , so you can do file-based > loading from inside anything that takes a property file. Or some easy > way of going into Java > tasks. I wrote my own element for this for the smartfrog tasks, and it > was v. useful

Re:

On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What would happen if we run all of gump without xerces, that is, > against whatever JAXP is on the runtime? The problem is not so much Xerces or Xalan but JAXP and DOM/SAX. Without using xml-commons' xml-apis.jar we are unable to b

Re: AW: 1.7 release timetable & features.

note to myself re wish list for Ant 1.7 for the summer... +1 to minor release to 'bed down' some of the structurally big changes w/o cross referencing with current buglist/wish listsoff the top of my head; - manual needs some pretty generous scrubbing and reorganisation (note: not a fan of

Re: AW: 1.7 release timetable & features.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mmh & smartfrog: if you are the author you should be able to change the license, IMO ;-) no, because I wrote it for my employer. I can redo it from scratch though, it wasnt hard. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: 1.7 release timetable & features.

you know, this summer will mark the two year point since Ant 1,6.0 shipped. Which means time for Ant1.7 is nearing. That long? Should we be organised, build up a list of features and then either start doing them or scrub them from the list? I think that without a list it would be too easy to ge

AW: 1.7 release timetable & features.

Eclipse should is "targeted for late June 2005" [1] and it would be good to release Ant 1.7 before, so that (maybe) Eclipse could ship 1.7. Would be also a good distribution :-) Also starting with a new minor version (1.6 -> 1.7) we should introduce the antlib subproject, because that is a major

AW: 1.7 release timetable & features.

> you know, this summer will mark the two year point since Ant 1,6.0 > shipped. Which means time for Ant1.7 is nearing. > > What do people think is a good release schedule/timetable? > > Or to put it differently, what do people want in *and stable* > before then? > > Things I must have: >

1.7 release timetable & features.

you know, this summer will mark the two year point since Ant 1,6.0 shipped. Which means time for Ant1.7 is nearing. What do people think is a good release schedule/timetable? Or to put it differently, what do people want in *and stable* before then? Things I must have: - with security & docs. -

Re:

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Stefan Bodewig wrote: Still, GNU JAXP is a nice alternative to try so we can be sure we don't write a Xerces-J only task. yes, it would be good. I've just committed a test-ant-no-xerces project definition to Gump

Re:

On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> Still, GNU JAXP is a nice alternative to try so we can be sure we >> don't write a Xerces-J only task. > > yes, it would be good. I've just committed a test-ant-no-xerces project definition to Gump. Startin

Re:

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Stefan Bodewig apache.org> writes: Even Gump enforces Xerces, but we could try to run the tests in Gump against whatever the VM provides as well - which would not only mean JDK 1.5 but also GNU JAXP (already JAXP 1

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33697] - exec gives errror on trying to run on solaris

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu