DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32163] - Telnet not working in Solaris

2004-11-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32163] - Telnet not working in Solaris

2004-11-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32163] - Telnet not working in Solaris

2004-11-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32170] New: - response to error generation on building tynamo web server with ant

2004-11-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: repository

2004-11-10 Thread Russell Gold
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 20:32:12 +, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:32:52 -0500, Russell Gold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > That is why I like the maven-style cache. It > > defines an unambiguous name for the cache and unambiguous names for > > each of the files i

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32163] - Telnet not working in Solaris

2004-11-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32163] - Telnet not working in Solaris

2004-11-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: repository

2004-11-10 Thread Steve Loughran
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:32:52 -0500, Russell Gold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 17:00:16 +, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I should note that I have been busy changing things, but havent > > committed anything yet as there are no new tests. The new chan

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32168] New: - Incomplete results from query batch displayed/logged from sql task

2004-11-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32163] - Telnet not working in Solaris

2004-11-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32163] - Telnet not working in Solaris

2004-11-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32012] - JavaC task seems to produce invalid switches to javac command

2004-11-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32163] - Telnet not working in Solaris

2004-11-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32163] - Telnet not working in Solaris

2004-11-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32163] New: - Telnet not working in Solaris

2004-11-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: repository

2004-11-10 Thread Dominique Devienne
> From: Russell Gold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On the other hand, perhaps the special version "LATEST" should > override that behavior and say that the task should try to pick > whatever version is the latest, and compare its times. This is more > common in at least some styles of internal deve

Re: repository

2004-11-10 Thread Russell Gold
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 17:00:16 +, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I should note that I have been busy changing things, but havent > committed anything yet as there are no new tests. The new change is IMO, > quite significant, and may change your opinion regardling the limits of > > E

Re: repository

2004-11-10 Thread Steve Loughran
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 11:18:09 -0500, Russell Gold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After some more thought, I would like to reopen the discussion on this > work. I see that we are trying to solve roughly the same problem > (projects obtaining dependencies from remote repositories) but with a > very dif

Re: repository

2004-11-10 Thread Russell Gold
After some more thought, I would like to reopen the discussion on this work. I see that we are trying to solve roughly the same problem (projects obtaining dependencies from remote repositories) but with a very different outlook. I think the differences are significant enough to discuss both betwee

RE: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs SyncTest.java

2004-11-10 Thread Dominique Devienne
> We will most likely need pattern matching for my use case. Things > like "keep the files named *.log" or "keep everything in foo/bar/ > recursively". For this to work we'll need to more or less duplicate > what DirectoryScanner does but could be faster for all the constant > file names by using

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30546] - XML Logger does not encode newlines in attributes

2004-11-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32142] - [PROPOSAL, PATCH] External public entity and new system entity IDs.

2004-11-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32142] - [PROPOSAL, PATCH] External public entity and new system entity IDs.

2004-11-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs SyncTest.java

2004-11-10 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > I'm sure I'm probably not understanding your change correctly, so >> > I guess I need an explanations for how your change works. >> >> Basically, if I want to be able to keep so

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32142] - [PROPOSAL, PATCH] External public entity and new system entity IDs.

2004-11-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32148] New: - path/fileset confusing when using relative paths and .. (parent directory)

2004-11-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Patch] change org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Concat to use static method FileUtils.readFully

2004-11-10 Thread Kevin Jackson
Was calling the method in a non-static manner. Single letter change from fileUtils -> FileUtils. Most of the newer code in FileUtils is non-static, but most of the older code is static, is this a historical oddity, or is there a reason for it? Also the contructor is protected, but there's no n

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32142] - [PROPOSAL, PATCH] External public entity and new system entity IDs.

2004-11-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32142] New: - [PROPOSAL, PATCH] External public entity and new system entity IDs.

2004-11-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Patch] Removed deprecated code from DefaultInputHandler

2004-11-10 Thread Kevin Jackson
Now uses BufferedReader and not DataInputStream. To avoid deprecated call to readLine Sorry JUnit test included requires some user intervention (getting data from System.in) Kev Index: DefaultInputHandler.java === RCS file: /home/

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/rmic KaffeRmic.java

2004-11-10 Thread stevel
stevel 2004/11/09 16:37:31 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant AntClassLoader.java ComponentHelper.java Diagnostics.java IntrospectionHelper.java Project.java TaskAdapter.java src/main/org/apache/t