DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23450] New: - add a standard ant.target property

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: [PATCH] Task getTaskType() and setTaskType()

> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 12:46 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Task getTaskType() and setTaskType() > > Given that there is no RuntimeConfigurable2 anymore, I'm not sure > whether it really still need

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23440] - imporove native2ascii task for opensource JVM

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21072] - Allow User-Specified Ant Library Access In Scripts

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Ant-antidote persistent properties

Here is a set of files I already sent to Christoph. I didn't want to clog the list, but then I realized it might be part of the community's informal group review process, so belatedly I am posting this to the list also: == Hi Christoph -- This diff + the new files (see the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23441] New: - support gjdoc with javadoc task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23440] New: - imporove native2ascii task for opensource JVM

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

com.kvisco classes for XslpLiaison

Has anyone on the list the com.kvisco classes which are required to compile XslpLiaison ? I am going to need them to produce the beta. Cheers, Antoine - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant UnknownElement.java

peterreilly2003/09/26 03:31:12 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH UnknownElement.java Log: sync with HEAD Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.63.2.1 +16 -2 ant/src/main/

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant UnknownElement.java

peterreilly2003/09/26 03:16:02 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant UnknownElement.java Log: UE#similar had forgot to check the text Revision ChangesPath 1.64 +16 -2 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/UnknownElement.java Index: UnknownElement.java ===

Re: Volunteering: ejclientjar task missing? I want to write it

On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Per Olesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just wanted to know, if I should be doing something active from now > on, lobbying. > or just wait till some of you with commit-access have the time to > look at it? Right now we are mainly busy with getting the 1.6 rlease out of the

AW: AW: Volunteering: ejclientjar task missing? I want to write it

Hi Per, first thanks for having prepared a submission. Second, we are planning to release 1.6 beta next week, so we are not keen on taking on new stuff immediately. Now there should not be any problem to add your task to 1.7. Maybe even to 1.6.1, but I am not sure whether the other committers agr

Re: [PROPOSAL] javadoc refactoring and supporting gjdoc

Sorry, I meant to respond to this a lot earlier. On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Current javadoc task support only SUN's javadoc. However there are > another javadoc engine like gjdoc which is GNU's javadoc altenative. How similar/different are javadoc and gjdoc

Re: AW: Volunteering: ejclientjar task missing? I want to write it

Hi, > When you have something ready, a report in bugzilla with the new files > attached to it as a tar or a tar.gz + a patch file made with cvs diff -u > for changes to existing code is what we like. Please include documentation > and test cases. With the risk of upsetting some of you busy develo

RE: AW: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23397] - Need attribute for target tag to indicate hidden/internal target

> From: Gus Heck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > How does a java application (other than ant) invoke an ant > target (I > can see using a task easily, but not a target) Can you give me an > example where a target gets invoked by java code? > Well there is the callTarget() method, but never

Re: AW: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23397] - Need attribute for target tag to indicate hidden/internal target

Agreed, This should be done in ant 1.7. Relying on dashes and descriptions for visiblity of targets is wrong. Peter On Friday 26 September 2003 09:43, Phil Weighill-Smith wrote: > We comment (with descriptions) all targets. Descriptions for targets > that are not public are there for build file

Re: AW: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23397] - Need attribute for target tag to indicate hidden/internal target

We comment (with descriptions) all targets. Descriptions for targets that are not public are there for build file maintenance. However, we could always just remove descriptions and put them in as XML comments I guess. But this conversation's really for a different forum now! Phil :n) On Thu, 2003

Re: Task getTaskType() and setTaskType()

On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Larry Shatzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any reason why getTaskType() is protected? The better question would be, is there any reason why setTaskType isn't package private anymore. task-type is supposed to be the name that has been used in the build file. task-na

Re: [patch] [vms] updates to Exec, DirectoryScanner, and FileUtils

Stefan, > > I have been working a little bit again to get Ant to run on > > OpenVMS. > > Thanks, patch committed with some slight indentation changes (if only > you could stop using tabs 8-). Cool. I'll try :-) --knut - To u