Re: [VOTE]: Getting 1.6 out the door

From: Antoine Lévy-Lambert > Hi, > I would like to propose a release plan for voting : > - features included in 1.6 : all the features currently present in head > - freeze date for 1.6 branch : Monday, September 22 13:00 GMT > - availability of ANT_16_B1 binaries : within one week of the freeze of

seems the last gump build has been on September 9th

I have just had a look at cvs.apache.org and seen that the last gump build there is from september 9th. Is there any particular reason ? Cheers, Antoine - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-ma

[patch] more typos!

Next round of typos... -- Larry Index: src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/depend/DirectoryIterator.java === RCS file: /home/cvspublic/ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/depend/DirectoryIterator.java,v

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23261] New: - enhance

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11903] - org.apache.tools.zip.ZipOutputStream.finish(ZipOutputStream.java(Compiled Code)) exception while creating a jar file

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23257] - java.lang.NullPointerException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23257] - java.lang.NullPointerException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23257] - java.lang.NullPointerException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23257] - java.lang.NullPointerException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Execute#getExitCode doesn't work as advertised

Hi Well fair enough, it is recognizable as the exit value will in that case be Integer.MAX_VALUE, so that should not be an issue. (So far for the non-hardcoded values) Thanks, Martijn Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: regarding option 1 would

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23257] - java.lang.NullPointerException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: AW: Probably a FAQ: how to contribute a task

> -Original Message- > From: Miguel Griffa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 10:02 AM > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: Re: AW: Probably a FAQ: how to contribute a task > > The task would do a very simple still needed (in my company > context, at > least)

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23257] New: - java.lang.NullPointerException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

AW: AW: Probably a FAQ: how to contribute a task

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Miguel Griffa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. September 2003 19:02 An: Ant Developers List Betreff: Re: AW: Probably a FAQ: how to contribute a task >The task would do a very simple still needed (in my company context, at >least) function:

Re: AW: Probably a FAQ: how to contribute a task

Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: I do not see a need to change something to the web site. There is a title "Contributing" on the home page of the ant.apache.org web site. To sum up : the preferred way is that you create a bug report in bugzilla, with as an attachment the output of cvs diff -u concerning

AW: Probably a FAQ: how to contribute a task

I do not see a need to change something to the web site. There is a title "Contributing" on the home page of the ant.apache.org web site. To sum up : the preferred way is that you create a bug report in bugzilla, with as an attachment the output of cvs diff -u concerning existing source files, plus

Re: Probably a FAQ: how to contribute a task

I found the entry at the FAQ, sorry for not reading it first Kenneth Wood wrote: Seems to me this question comes up over and over, because no one seems to know to look in the CVS source code tree for the information on how to make submissions. May I suggest two things: 1. Put the info on making su

RE: Probably a FAQ: how to contribute a task

Seems to me this question comes up over and over, because no one seems to know to look in the CVS source code tree for the information on how to make submissions. May I suggest two things: 1. Put the info on making submissions right up front on the Ant home page where no one can possibly mi

Probably a FAQ: how to contribute a task

Hi all I was wondering if someone could give me a hint on how this process is. I'm probably going to write a task which I think would be usefull to have in ant. sould I write it and just send it to the list? - To unsubscribe, e-

RE: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/filters Co ncatFilterTest.java

will result in TEXT-OF-BEFORE TEXT-OF-FILE TEXT-OF-AFTER Ok - when writing that class I wasn´t very save in English ;-) I can rename that before --> prepend after --> append But that´s the minor thing. More interesting for me was the update from my notebook via mobile phone :-) Jan

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/filters ConcatFilterTest.java

On 18 Sep 2003, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > New filter . Adds the content of file at the > beginning or end of a file. How about naming the attributes prepend and append instead of before and after? In > will before.txt come before the copied file or will the copied file come b

cvs commit: ant WHATSNEW

jhm 2003/09/18 08:47:47 Modified:.WHATSNEW Log: Typo in url Revision ChangesPath 1.502 +1 -1 ant/WHATSNEW Index: WHATSNEW === RCS file: /home/cvs/ant/WHATSNEW,v retrieving revi

cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/filters ConcatFilterTest.java

jhm 2003/09/18 08:39:26 Modified:.WHATSNEW Added: src/etc/testcases/filters concat.xml src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/filters ConcatFilter.java src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/filters ConcatFilterTest.java Log:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23253] New: - updating link for netcomponents.jar

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: new Launcher and CLASSPATH

On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 12:18 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> Not in this case, as the classloader created in Launcher contains >> all that's been in the CLASSPATH already itself. > > I'm not sure that is true. Yes, my fault, I didn't lo

Re: circular s

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 07:57 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > (1) The current build file (the one intially loaded) should be added > to the list of already imported files implicitly so it doesn't get > loaded twice at all. > > (2) circular imports look like a bug to me - the build should fail. > +1 to bot

Re: [VOTE]: Getting 1.6 out the door

On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 07:58 pm, Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote: > Hi, > I would like to propose a release plan for voting : > - features included in 1.6 : all the features currently present in head > - freeze date for 1.6 branch : Monday, September 22 13:00 GMT > - availability of ANT_16_B1 binaries : wi

Re: new Launcher and CLASSPATH

On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 12:18 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > This approach in the end is really the same as not using the > > CLASSPATH variable. After all, if we don't delegate, we wont find > > the classes the user has put in their classpath wh

cvs commit: ant/xdocs index.xml

conor 2003/09/18 07:27:02 Modified:docs index.html page.css xdocsindex.xml Log: ApacheCon blurb Revision ChangesPath 1.287 +14 -15ant/docs/index.html Index: index.html

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs ExecTask.java Execute.java Java.java

bodewig 2003/09/18 07:21:41 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs ExecTask.java Execute.java Java.java Log: Treat timeout like a failed execution, fix comments on Execute#getExitCode Revision ChangesPath 1.61 +6 -1 ant/src/main/

Re: new Launcher and CLASSPATH

On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The issue comes from getting it to not delegate. I know. > This approach in the end is really the same as not using the > CLASSPATH variable. After all, if we don't delegate, we wont find > the classes the user has put in their cla

AW: new Launcher and CLASSPATH

AntClassLoader has a constructor without arguments, which is called from Project#createClassLoader Do we want to create a new constructor for AntClassLoader with just the Project as parameter, so that the class loader can be set there ? Antoine -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: Stefan Bodewi

Re: new Launcher and CLASSPATH

On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 11:41 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > I don't think this will work. No matter which classloader you use to > > find the class, if it is found on the system class loader it will > > try to load dependent classes with the

Re: [VOTE]: Getting 1.6 out the door

On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since Costin has not chimed in, it is worth reading this message and > Costin's followup Interesting, you are raising the same point as me 8-) The situation could be "fixed", if AntClassLoader would know whether it has loaded any c

Re: Should cause an error when used inside a ?

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 09:17 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > OK, if I nest into a target, something like > > > > > I'm not keen on s within targets. The use-case seems too narrow to me and it seems to confuse the target and top level scopes (which are sort of confused anyway because we don't ha

Re: new Launcher and CLASSPATH

On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 08:29 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> (2) Fix all tasks that load classes - like Definer - to delegate to >> the classloader created in Launcher instead of the system >> classloader. > > I don't think this will work

Re: [VOTE]: Getting 1.6 out the door

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 07:51 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> In particular, I'm not too fond of the completely undocumented > >> task. > > > > It would be nice to get this fixed. > > I rather opposed to the idea of adding stuff to a class

RE: new Launcher and CLASSPATH

> > As ant.jar cannot be found on the system classloader anymore, any > > class loaded from the system classloader (i.e. classes coming from > > CLASSPATH) can't load the Task class for example. > > > > I see two options: > > > > (1) live with it and document it properly (which means > people may

Re: Execute#getExitCode doesn't work as advertised

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > regarding option 1 wouldn't this still need a patch to set > killedProcess() to true Hmm, only if it has been the watchdog that has killed the process IMHO. If the InterruptedException has been raised for any other reason, we sho

Re: new Launcher and CLASSPATH

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 08:29 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > So far all our documentation more or less states that putting your jar > containing custom tasks into ANT_HOME/lib or pointing to it in your > CLASSPATH was equivalent. This is no longer true if the new launcher > is used. True. > > As ant.ja

Re: Should cause an error when used inside a ?

On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wonder if we really want to go into this world of > dynamic-programming, If you go back in the thread, you'll see that I'm not even sure whether the use-case is a good one or not myself. If we prohibit inside , people wi

Re: Should cause an error when used inside a ?

On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan, IIRC there was consensus that we should add an extra include > task to only substitute entity includes. My recollection is different. No consensus on that AFAICR. Stefan ---

RE: Should cause an error when used inside a ?

> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Jose Alberto Fernandez > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>First, makes absolute no sense to me inside a > . The > >>whole point of import was allowing for target-overriding. I cou

Re: Should cause an error when used inside a ?

On Thursday 18 September 2003 13:00, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Jose Alberto Fernandez > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>First, makes absolute no sense to me inside a . > >>The whole point of import was allowing for target-overriding. > >>I coul

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23244] - New ImageSizeSelector

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23244] New: - New ImageSizeSelector

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Should cause an error when used inside a ?

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: First, makes absolute no sense to me inside a . The whole point of import was allowing for target-overriding. I could understand having an in there, because is textually expanding the file in place, whic

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23243] - Image task should support mapper element

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23243] - Image task should support mapper element

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23243] New: - Image task should support mapper element

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Should cause an error when used inside a ?

On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First, makes absolute no sense to me inside a . > The whole point of import was allowing for target-overriding. > I could understand having an in there, because is > textually expanding the file in place, which may make sen

RE: Should cause an error when used inside a ?

> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Shall we make this ("Thou Shalt Not Use Inside > s") a rule for in general and enforce it? > Or is my use-case above a valid one and we change the > implementation to deal with it? > First, makes absolute no sense to me inside a . The

Re: Should cause an error when used inside a ?

On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So will we allow inside a ? If it was a pure include, I'd say yes. If we don't allow it, can't replace entity includes completely. Given the side effect of target overriding, I'm not sure. At least we have to ensure that the impo

Re: Should cause an error when used inside a ?

On Thursday 18 September 2003 10:03, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This implementation does handle your use-case (I think) > > The unit tests I've just committed confirm that. ;-) So will we allow inside a ? Peter -

Re: Should cause an error when used inside a ?

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This implementation does handle your use-case (I think) The unit tests I've just committed confirm that. ;-) Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs ImportTest.java

bodewig 2003/09/18 02:02:23 Modified:src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs ImportTest.java Added: src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/import/subdir importintarget-inner.xml importintarget.xml Log: Add tests for inside Revision ChangesPath 1.

Re: Excel 2 Xml task ?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anybody know of an ant task that is able to read excel sheets and convert it into xml (or some other format) ? I don´t know any. Maybe the POI project has something. The POI project does not (yet) have a task, although it does have code in Cocoon CVS to handle the c

RE: Excel 2 Xml task ?

> Does anybody know of an ant task that is able to read excel sheets and convert it into xml (or some other format) ? I don´t know any. Maybe the POI project has something. > Which makes me wonder: are there any guidelines specifying when and how a new task should be added as an optional task ?

Excel 2 Xml task ?

Title: Excel 2 Xml task ? Does anybody know of an ant task that is able to read excel sheets and convert it into xml (or some other format) ? For a previous project I hacked a task that was able to do just that (using apache poi). If there is no such task around and there is sufficient int

RE: [NOT PATCH] Possible new optional task for file modification

If you have CVS access, the simplest thing for creating a patch is using the patch.xml buildfile in ants rootdirectory. Described in docs/ant_task_guidelines.html "Submitting to Ant" Jan > -Original Message- > From: Phil Weighill-Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, Septem

RE: [NOT PATCH] Possible new optional task for file modification

Thanks for letting me know... How do I go about creating a "patch" (bearing in mind I've not used CVS before)? That way perhaps I can get the stuff through to you... Do you think the summary of what this task does sounds useful? Phil :n. On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 18:54, Shatzer, Larry wrote: > Unfo

AW: new Launcher and CLASSPATH

Hi Stefan, I think this is a very important issue for ant 1.6. I would like to delay ant 1.6 until this issue is solved, because the ability of using custom tasks is a crucial feature. Cheers, Antoine -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mit