[PATCH] Next round of typo fixes

2003-09-15 Thread Shatzer, Larry
More typos and misspellings... -- Larry Index: src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Copy.java === RCS file: /home/cvspublic/ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Copy.java,v retrieving revision 1.65 diff -u -r1.65 Copy.java --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20080] - would like to have a task which can kill another task by its task id

2003-09-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23150] - [Patch] JUnitTask does not mark timed out tests as failed when forked

2003-09-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23150] - JUnitTask does not mark timed out tests as failed when forked

2003-09-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23150] - JUnitTask does not mark timed out tests as failed when forked

2003-09-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs MacroDef.java MacroInstance.java Manifest.java MatchingTask.java Move.java Parallel.java Patch.java PreSetDef.java Property.java Redirector.java Rmic.java SQLExec.java Sleep.java StreamPumper.java

2003-09-15 Thread peterreilly
peterreilly2003/09/15 09:55:01 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs MacroDef.java MacroInstance.java Manifest.java MatchingTask.java Move.java Parallel.java Patch.java PreSetDef.java Property.java Redirect

Re: Antidote - Eating More Dog Food

2003-09-15 Thread Jack Woehr
peter reilly wrote: > > The warning is caused by > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21180 > but why is antidote using import ? Dunno, don't see such a thing in the build.xml file, which is unitary. But never having used 'import' not sure. -- Jack J. Woehr# "[F]ar in

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23150] - JUnitTask does not mark timed out tests as failed when forked

2003-09-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: antidote diff

2003-09-15 Thread Jack Woehr
peter reilly wrote: > if the -d is missing, cvs does not check for new directories. Arghh! Caught by the oldest trap in the business! :-) -- Jack J. Woehr# "[F]ar in the empty sky a solitary esophagus slept http://www.well.com/~jax # upon motionless wing; everywhere brooded stillne

Re: Antidote - Eating More Dog Food

2003-09-15 Thread peter reilly
The warning is caused by http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21180 but why is antidote using import ? Peter On Monday 15 September 2003 16:57, Jack Woehr wrote: > Building antidote in antidote I get this weird msg: > > main: > Duplicated project name in import. Project Antidote defin

Re: antidote diff

2003-09-15 Thread peter reilly
On Monday 15 September 2003 16:48, Jack Woehr wrote: > > Hmm, I just updated my tree and ./build.sh yields the following: > > src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/selectors/SelectorContainer.java:59: > package org.apache.tools.ant.types.selectors.modifiedselector does not > exist import You need t

Antidote - Eating More Dog Food

2003-09-15 Thread Jack Woehr
Building antidote in antidote I get this weird msg: main: Duplicated project name in import. Project Antidote defined first in /usr/local/src/apache/apache_src/ant-antidote/build.xml and again in /usr/local/src/apache/apache_src/ant-antidote/build.xml -- Jack J. Woehr# "[F]ar in th

Re: antidote diff

2003-09-15 Thread Jack Woehr
Erik Hatcher wrote: > > I just committed a couple of fixes to bring proposal/xdocs back up to > speed. Let me know if you encounter any issues running it. Again, run > the "docs-from-scratch" target to get the full picture. Also, you'll > need to bump up your memory allocation to get XDoclet ha

RE: [PATCH] More typos

2003-09-15 Thread Shatzer, Larry
My bad, the patch was my last one... here is the new one. -- Larry > -Original Message- > From: Shatzer, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 8:37 AM > To: 'Ant Developers List' > Subject: RE: [PATCH] More typos > > Also attached, my next set of typo correct

RE: [PATCH] More typos

2003-09-15 Thread Shatzer, Larry
> -Original Message- > From: Antoine Lévy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 5:58 AM > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: AW: [PATCH] More typos > > > > Patches committed, thanks. > Antoine Found another line ending one: src/main/org/apache/tools/ant

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23150] - JUnitTask does not mark timed out tests as failed when forked

2003-09-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE]: Getting 1.6 out the door

2003-09-15 Thread peter reilly
On Friday 12 September 2003 11:18, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Antoine Lévy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > - features included in 1.6 : all the features currently present in > > head +1 > > +0 > > In particular, I'm not too fond of the completely undocumented > task.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22570] - A little tutorial "How to write Tasks"

2003-09-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18537] - I'd like to be able to have valid XML documents for inclusion according to FAQ

2003-09-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: antidote diff

2003-09-15 Thread Erik Hatcher
I just committed a couple of fixes to bring proposal/xdocs back up to speed. Let me know if you encounter any issues running it. Again, run the "docs-from-scratch" target to get the full picture. Also, you'll need to bump up your memory allocation to get XDoclet happy. I do this: se

cvs commit: ant/proposal/xdocs build.xml

2003-09-15 Thread ehatcher
ehatcher2003/09/15 02:14:14 Modified:proposal/xdocs build.xml Log: copy selectors/available from main build to account for new conditiosn Revision ChangesPath 1.24 +283 -246 ant/proposal/xdocs/build.xml Index: build.xml ===

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs XSLTProcess.java

2003-09-15 Thread ehatcher
ehatcher2003/09/15 02:11:57 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs XSLTProcess.java Log: xjavadoc has issues with parsing the trailing comment. easier to remove the comment than to fix xjavadoc :) Revision ChangesPath 1.77 +2 -2 ant/src/main/org/apac

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/types/sele ctors ModifiedSelectorTest.java BaseSelectorTest.java

2003-09-15 Thread peter reilly
On Sunday 14 September 2003 02:20, Dominique Devienne wrote: > Why so many files modified? I thought that after Peter's modif to Ant Core, > as long as a selector is typedef'd, there's no need any more to hard code > stuff in SelectorContainer and AbstractFileSet??? Or maybe I misunderstood > some

Re: antidote diff

2003-09-15 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Monday, September 15, 2003, at 01:41 AM, Christoph Wilhelms wrote: Atidote was relying on dtd description of tasks and types but i changed this to introspection to gain more flexibility. Additionally the DTDs quickly became outdated! There had be a plan to aotomatically generate metadata/metain

Re: antidote diff

2003-09-15 Thread Jack J. Woehr
Christoph Wilhelms wrote: > It's an old, but just in some points outdated TODO-list. Feel free to > pic up a task! This is the same checked-in TODO list that is in the CVS tree, right? Maybe the first step is to update the TODO list :-) Let's look at some items from TODO List: * Cleanup bu

re: antidote diff

2003-09-15 Thread Christoph Wilhelms
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Christoph Wilhelms wrote: > > > One thing that has been started, but has never finished is a Wizard > > for build-files! Would be nice if you could pick that task up! > > Is there a spec or design for this? There's just the implementation you find in the code (wizard

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23165] - javadoc task should allow multiple "link" parameters

2003-09-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: antidote diff

2003-09-15 Thread Jack J. Woehr
Christoph Wilhelms wrote: > One thing that has been started, but has never finished is a Wizard for > build-files! Would be nice if you could pick that task up! Is there a spec or design for this? > Another thing not implemented is support for "xml-import" Can you explain xml-import, please? >

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23165] - javadoc task should allow multiple "link" parameters

2003-09-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu