On Friday 12 September 2003 11:18, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Antoine Lévy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > - features included in 1.6 : all the features currently present in > > head +1 > > +0 > > In particular, I'm not too fond of the completely undocumented > <classloader> task.
It would be nice to get this fixed. > > Peter, we will have to get this "why is <antlib> a taskcontainer" > question sorted out soon ;-) Like I said before, it is nice that one can use definers defined in the same antlib.xml. Having <antlib/> as a taskcontainer also allows arbitarary tasks to be run, which may be an good or bad thing...... Peter > > > - freeze date for 1.6 branch : Monday, September 22 13:00 GMT > > which is rather soon given the number of open bug reports. But we > have to get ready sometime. > > > - availability of ANT_16_B1 binaries : within one week of the freeze > > of the branch. > > Oops. Again, given the number of open reports, this is really soon. > > May I suggest to create the 1.6 branch and limit it to bug fixing and > doc changes but push the first beta at least one more week out. > Otherwise we'll need quite a few betas before we are happy with the > release, I'm afraid. > > > - release manager : myself > > > > (I hope this is OK, although I am not a PMC member). > > Fine with me, even though it may put you into the stange position that > the release manager's vote on the release itself is not binding - > technically. > > Ping me if you need help. > > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
