DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20137] - Invalid creator ID on build of ant

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20144] - Javadoc task running with cygwin

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Enhance chgrp/chown?

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Wed, 21 May 2003, Gus Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Stefan Bodewig wrote: currently chmod has a fair number of additional features. Which are? dir, includes, excludes, defaultexcludes... Please don't! These attributes come from the pre-fileset time and are only kept for

RE: [VOTE] Peter Reilly as committer

> I would like to propose Peter Reilly as an Ant committer. He has > submitted a > number of patches that advance the Ant core fanctions as well as > helping out > answering questions on the user list. I think we've all seen that > he has the > persistence required :-) > > I will start with

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5969] - Is SMTP authorization possible for MailLogger ??

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5969] - Is SMTP authorization possible for MailLogger ??

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20153] - zip/unzip tasks - last modified dates off by an hour

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20144] - Javadoc task running with cygwin

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20164] - File list generation needs to include date handling

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Peter Reilly as committer

+1 On Thursday, May 22, 2003, at 07:26 AM, Conor MacNeill wrote: Hi, I would like to propose Peter Reilly as an Ant committer. He has submitted a number of patches that advance the Ant core fanctions as well as helping out answering questions on the user list. I think we've all seen that he has

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20153] - zip/unzip tasks - last modified dates off by an hour

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20164] New: - File list generation needs to include date handling

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20153] - zip/unzip tasks - last modified dates off by an hour

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20163] New: - CvsChangeLog task support for branches

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20153] - zip/unzip tasks - last modified dates off by an hour

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Peter Reilly as committer

Conor MacNeill wrote: Hi, I would like to propose Peter Reilly as an Ant committer. He has submitted a number of patches that advance the Ant core fanctions as well as helping out answering questions on the user list. I think we've all seen that he has the persistence required :-) I will start

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20137] - Invalid creator ID on build of ant

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19181] - docs of subant task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19181] - docs of subant task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20153] New: - zip/unzip tasks - last modified dates off by an hour

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Peter Reilly as committer

+1 Costin Conor MacNeill wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose Peter Reilly as an Ant committer. He has submitted > a number of patches that advance the Ant core fanctions as well as helping > out answering questions on the user list. I think we've all seen that he > has the persistence req

Re: antlib

On Thu, 22 May 2003, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is perfectly possible to program ant so that roles are optional > and just make things more explicit. It certainly is. Peter's patch is half-way there (roles are not optional but not there at all 8-) - roles can be plugged

Re: antlib

On Thu, 22 May 2003, Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> I'm not sure that the build file writer is going to read the antlib >> descriptor, though. > > But remember we want to be able to say this same things inside build files >

RE: antlib

> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Thu, 22 May 2003, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Reading this, and knowing that computearea and computeperimeter > > accept shapes as nested element, a build file writer would know that > > and can be nested inside

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20144] New: - Javadoc task running with cygwin

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Peter Reilly as committer

I also give my +1 Antoine - Original Message - From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 1:26 PM Subject: [VOTE] Peter Reilly as committer > Hi, > > I would like to propose Peter Reilly as an Ant committer. He has

Re: [VOTE] Peter Reilly as committer

+1 Stefan

Re: [VOTE] Peter Reilly as committer

+1 Cheers, Magesh - Original Message - From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 7:26 AM Subject: [VOTE] Peter Reilly as committer > Hi, > > I would like to propose Peter Reilly as an Ant committer. He has submi

[VOTE] Peter Reilly as committer

Hi, I would like to propose Peter Reilly as an Ant committer. He has submitted a number of patches that advance the Ant core fanctions as well as helping out answering questions on the user list. I think we've all seen that he has the persistence required :-) I will start with my +1 Conor

Re: antlib

I also think the roles concept is good for the following reasons: * The current implemention of conditions/selectors/filters (a big sequence of add()) is tightly coupled. The implementation means that new conditions/selectors/filters (to be used in the same way as current conditions/

Re: antlib

Stefan Bodewig wrote : > With roles, would an arbitrary implementation of ShapeInterface that > was not bundled with the antlib and was not declared to be in role > shape be accepted as nested element in ? > > If the answer is yes, then roles would be optional and would mainly be > used to make thi

Re: antlib / proposal of Peter Reilly

On Thursday 22 May 2003 10:29, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Thu, 22 May 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok I will chop it up into a sequence of patches. > > Thanks. > > > The first patch adds the add(Type) introspection method and > > implements this in condition, filterchain, token

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19897] - Patch to implement the namespaced antlib + other changes

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: antlib

On Thu, 22 May 2003, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Reading this, and knowing that computearea and computeperimeter > accept shapes as nested element, a build file writer would know that > and can be nested inside and > . So roles make the antlib descriptor more expressive,

Re: antlib / proposal of Peter Reilly

Sounds great. - Original Message - From: "peter reilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 10:56 AM Subject: Re: antlib / proposal of Peter Reilly On Saturday 17 May 2003 19:59, Costin Manolache wrote: > > My main concern is the

Re: antlib

I think that roles add clarity to description of datatypes or components. I liked the syntax of the antlib descriptor proposed by Jose Alberto, which in my example with shapes would have been : ... ... Reading this, and knowing that computearea and computeperimeter accept shapes

Re: antlib / proposal of Peter Reilly

On Thu, 22 May 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok I will chop it up into a sequence of patches. Thanks. > The first patch adds the add(Type) introspection method and > implements this in condition, filterchain, tokenfilter, selector and > path. I'm +1 for this patch, and only ha

Re: antlib / proposal of Peter Reilly

On Saturday 17 May 2003 19:59, Costin Manolache wrote: > > My main concern is the same as Conor's - having this decoupled and done > in few steps. Ok I will chop it up into a sequence of patches. > > That means you have to start with add(Type), then anttypdef, then onerror. The first patch adds

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19897] - Patch to implement the namespaced antlib + other changes

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19897] - Patch to implement the namespaced antlib + other changes

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/proposal/xdocs/src/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs SubAnt.xml

antoine 2003/05/22 00:27:51 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs SubAnt.java docs/manual/CoreTasks subant.html proposal/xdocs/src/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs SubAnt.xml Log: Removed ignoremissingbuildfile, following a remark of DD (Dominique

Re: Enhance chgrp/chown? (was: Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Chmod.java ExecuteOn.java)

On Wed, 21 May 2003, Gus Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> >>>currently chmod has a fair number of additional features. >> Which are? >> > > dir, includes, excludes, defaultexcludes... Please don't! These attributes come from the pre-fileset time and are only kept for ba

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20137] New: - Invalid creator ID on build of ant

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: antlib

On Thu, 22 May 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I still don't really see the need for roles I'm not convinced either. Stefan

Re: antlib

Conor MacNeill wrote: > On Thu, 22 May 2003 01:02 am, Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: >> Whatever we adopt, it definetly need to be written from scratch. :-) >> > > Cool. All I had to go on was the code. If we agree that roles are based on > the interface implemented by the nested element, that is

Re: antlib / proposal of Peter Reilly

Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 21 May 2003, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I've seen that Costin and Conor prefer that antlibs specify their >> URI themselves. Could anybody please explain why > > OK, let me try to summarize your answers: > > Peter says - letting the user chose the

Re: antlib

On Thu, 22 May 2003 01:02 am, Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: > Whatever we adopt, it definetly need to be written from scratch. :-) > Cool. All I had to go on was the code. If we agree that roles are based on the interface implemented by the nested element, that is good. It was my main concern. I