Re: JDK 1.1 support

- Original Message - From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 15:28 Subject: JDK 1.1 support > I'd like to throw this up again. What are peoples thoughts on the following > > 1. Make Ant 1.6.x the last JDK 1.1 release. This would b

RE: JDK 1.1 support

+1 -Original Message- From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 5:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: JDK 1.1 support I'd like to throw this up again. What are peoples thoughts on the following 1. Make Ant 1.6.x the last JDK 1.1 release. This would b

RE: JDK 1.1 support

+1 -Original Message- From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 3:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: JDK 1.1 support I'd like to throw this up again. What are peoples thoughts on the following 1. Make Ant 1.6.x the last JDK 1.1 release. This would b

JDK 1.1 support

I'd like to throw this up again. What are peoples thoughts on the following 1. Make Ant 1.6.x the last JDK 1.1 release. This would be clearly documented 2. Make the subsequent release require JDK 1.2+ (what about leap frogging to later versions?) 3. Name this subsequent release Ant 2.0 (due to

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17978] New: - task pathconvert fails to recognize refid from filelist

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: sql triggers, stored procedures, packages, format preserved

- Original Message - From: "Anderson, Rob H - VSCM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Ant Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 13:04 Subject: RE: sql triggers, stored procedures, packages, format preserved > Steve, My build process will rely heavily on this task t

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs SQLExec.java

stevel 2003/03/13 13:41:11 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs SQLExec.java Log: option to preserve formatting in inline SQL, bug ID http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10719 The diff is bigger than it need be; someone's editor must have stripped ext

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10719] - Files processed under SQL task are hacked

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

New External Task

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I wrote a new external task which adds the possibility to use W3C's XInclusions. The implementation is based on Elliotte Rusty Harolds XInclude implementation which is released under LGPL license. More information can be found at http://www.j

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17408] - 6 New ClearCase Tasks Created

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17408] - 6 New ClearCase Tasks Created

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: sql triggers, stored procedures, packages, format preserved

Steve, My build process will rely heavily on this task to load packages, procedures, triggers, view, types, and apply grants in Oracle9i. I agree that some tests are needed and I will look into creating some. Thanks, -Rob Anderson -Original Message- From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PRO

Re: [PATCH] Ant Task - Proposed Enhancement

- Original Message - From: "Dominique Devienne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Ant Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 07:55 Subject: RE: [PATCH] Ant Task - Proposed Enhancement > But where does it stop? also supports automatic ordering of the > projects call

Re: [PATCH] Ant Task - Proposed Enhancement

- Original Message - From: "Andrew Goodnough" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 08:54 Subject: RE: [PATCH] Ant Task - Proposed Enhancement > This new ant task has no support for running several targets, forking, > child->pare

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17975] New: - EAR task doesn't inlcude specified appxml

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17973] New: - A target just like a target

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17934] - Dates too late in jar entries

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17961] - New task to collect services from a JAR

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17934] - Dates too late in jar entries

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17934] - Dates too late in jar entries

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17961] - New task to collect services from a JAR

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17961] - New task to collect services from a JAR

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17871] - war task's webxml attrib no longer is able to use value with a starting backslash for the path in Windows

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [PATCH] Ant Task - Proposed Enhancement

Yeah, if you put out in CVS, I'd be happy to play around with it to see how it could fit for me. Andy >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/13/2003 11:07:53 AM >>> I am more minded to put the subant in there, with perhaps some minor tweaks. The reason to use a separate task when there are major changes in fun

Re: [PATCH] Ant Task - Proposed Enhancement

I am more minded to put the subant in there, with perhaps some minor tweaks. The reason to use a separate task when there are major changes in functionality are (a) we can have more sensible defaults (here: property inheritance, and what happens when you invoke a target called "" . I'd like that t

RE: [PATCH] Ant Task - Proposed Enhancement

Mmm...spoken like someone with an emotional attachment to SubAnt due to your involvement with it. Let's be constructive and stick with the merits of my proposal because you've got some good points. BTW, this is my first submittal to any open source project so let's approach this from a "today's m

Re: sql triggers, stored procedures, packages, format preserved

- Original Message - From: "Anderson, Rob H - VSCM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Ant Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 08:41 Subject: RE: sql triggers, stored procedures, packages, format preserved > The diff -u is now the latest attachement to the bug. g

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14553] - Add support for a separate CLASSPATH

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17961] - New task to collect services from a JAR

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17961] New: - New task to collect services from a JAR

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: sql triggers, stored procedures, packages, format preserved

The diff -u is now the latest attachement to the bug. -Rob Anderson -Original Message- From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 3:42 PM To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: sql triggers, stored procedures, packages, format preserved can we have the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17506] - loadproperties not working with non latin characters

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14553] - Add support for a separate CLASSPATH

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17871] - war task's webxml attrib no longer is able to use value with a starting backslash for the path in Windows

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util FileUtils.java

bodewig 2003/03/13 08:22:14 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Tag: ANT_15_BRANCH Ear.java War.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util Tag: ANT_15_BRANCH FileUtils.java Log: Merge fix for bug 17871 from HEAD

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util FileUtils.java

bodewig 2003/03/13 08:15:47 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util FileUtils.java Log: misleading @since tag Revision ChangesPath 1.39 +1 -1 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util/FileUtils.java Index: FileUtils.java =

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util FileUtils.java

bodewig 2003/03/13 08:14:51 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Ear.java War.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util FileUtils.java Log: This is supposed to fix bug 17871. The patch looks innocent enough for me to merge it into the 1.5 branch right a

RE: Possible TaskDef donation

Why not posting it? Seems interesting enough, and once it's posted people can start using it or tweaking it. Best way to post it is to open a new Enhancement in Ant's BugZilla. This keeps everything in one place (posted sources, JARs, ZIPs, whatever and the discussions about it). Using URLClassLoa

Re: Possible TaskDef donation

Dominique Devienne wrote: This is indeed interesting. I do something quite similar for another purpose (scans a JAR for all classes having a give static method signature, executes all these methods, gathering the meta-info required, generate a XML file then stuck into the JAR's META-INF directory).

RE: [PATCH] Ant Task - Proposed Enhancement

But where does it stop? also supports automatic ordering of the projects called based on the declared dependencies of the projects in an XML file... Should that go into as well? (granted, I didn't submit that, it's only in my sandbox...) According to your reasoning, features should have gone in

[PATCH] Ant Task - Proposed Enhancement

The current ant task runs an ant process for a specified build file in a specified directory. I wanted to be able to give it more than one directory, and execute the build file found in each directory specified, or give it a set of build files to execute. This can be really useful for building pr

RE: Possible TaskDef donation

This is indeed interesting. I do something quite similar for another purpose (scans a JAR for all classes having a give static method signature, executes all these methods, gathering the meta-info required, generate a XML file then stuck into the JAR's META-INF directory). Something I do is to res

Suggestion EJbjar exclude dependants

I think it would be useful in some cases. For instance I have the attribute dependency="full" and dependency analyzer includes in myejb.jar classes that have to be in app server classpath. So I have them double and probably class loading issues. What do you mind? Does it make sense to include an

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17952] New: - "failonerror" and "verbose" undocumented on

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: 1.6 milestones ?

On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 06:29 pm, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > What about releasing an ant 1.5.4 before 1.6 with the current head revision > in it, plus as many bugs from bugzilla as possible ? A rose by any other name. If we release the HEAD revision, we'll call it 1.6 > This would help a number of

Re: 1.6 milestones ?

On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 12:02 pm, Costin Manolache wrote: > Steve Loughran wrote: > > That's the task that doesnt have any documentation, right? > > > :-) > > It'll have documentation after it is reviewed by more people and we > know it's going to be stable. > I think more people will be able to try

Re: 1.6 milestones ?

On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 09:50 am, Costin Manolache wrote: > Hi, > > Do we have any plan or idea on when we'll start distributing 1.6 milestone > builds ? > I'm not really sure what a milestone build means and, more importantly, what expectations it creates for stability of feature set. For 1.6 I th

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/OptionalTasks sshexec.html

bodewig 2003/03/13 01:01:54 Modified:.WHATSNEW docs/manual install.html optionaltasklist.html Added: docs/manual/OptionalTasks sshexec.html Log: Documentation for . Submitted by: Rob Anderson Revision ChangesPath 1.363 +3 -3 a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17871] - war task's webxml attrib no longer is able to use value with a starting backslash for the path in Windows

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17934] - Dates too late in jar entries

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[OT] Apache/Ant people at CeBIT

Hi, the Apache Software Foundation is going to man a booth at the CeBIT fair in Hannover (Germany, that is 8-) next Monday. Christoph Wilhelms and myself as well as a couple of other Apache people - including the ASF's president Dirk-Willem van Gulik - are going to be there. If you are there and

Re: 1.6 milestones ?

On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do we have any plan or idea on when we'll start distributing 1.6 > milestone builds ? Ant has never released any milestone builds so far, so no, there is no plan yet AFAIK. If there was, you'd know it for sure 8-) Before we rele

Re: 1.6 milestones ?

Steve Loughran wrote, On 13/03/2003 0.39: ... That's the task that doesnt have any documentation, right? Jikes, you're right. How do I submit it, as the usual HTML page or the @tags... I'm a bit behind the Ant documentation efforts, sorry. Maybe the thing to do is look at what major changes stil

Re: 1.6 milestones ?

On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It'll have documentation after it is reviewed by more people and we > know it's going to be stable. I don't like this approach at all. How are you expecting user feedback on an undocumented feature? Stefan

Re: 1.6 milestones ?

What about releasing an ant 1.5.4 before 1.6 with the current head revision in it, plus as many bugs from bugzilla as possible ? This would help a number of people and be encouraging for all the ant users who have reported bugs or suggested patches in bugzilla. Plus this would bring the task to a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14553] - Add support for a separate CLASSPATH

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17927] - junitreport

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10719] - Files processed under SQL task are hacked

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: 1.6 milestones ?

Steve Loughran wrote: > That's the task that doesnt have any documentation, right? :-) It'll have documentation after it is reviewed by more people and we know it's going to be stable. > Maybe the thing to do is look at what major changes still need to go in to > ant. Now that we have explo