Steve Loughran wrote: > That's the <import> task that doesnt have any documentation, right?
:-) It'll have documentation after it is reviewed by more people and we know it's going to be stable. > Maybe the thing to do is look at what major changes still need to go in to > ant. Now that we have exploded optional.jar, we need to compensate by > perhaps adding a boot loader process for running ant, so that win9x boxes > dont run out of memory. We also need to rework the documentation. > > The other feature I thought was on the cards was some kind of plugin > mechanism that pulls in new jars better -presumably a manifest, and the > appropriate extensions to <taskdef> to handle them. > > I think together these would be core features that need to be up and > running before we can worry about milestone releases. The point of a milestone release is to get feedback on the new features. Many people are not comfortable building ant HEAD from sources. Costin
