RE: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.6.2 from 2.6.2rc2

<https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31140> #31352 <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31352> #31445 <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31445> - Completed UI sanity. Rahul Vats Senior Software Engineer in Test, Astronomer Mobile: +91-9953794332 On 2023/06/14 22:39:02

RE: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.6.2 from 2.6.2rc2

<https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31140> #31352 <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31352> #31445 <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/31445> - Completed UI sanity. Rahul Vats Senior Software Engineer in Test, Astronomer Mobile: +91-9953794332 On 2023/06/14 22:39:02

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.6.3 from 2.6.3rc1

+1 (non-binding) Below are the list of item I have tested: - Example DAGS with Celery and k8s executor in RC. - Verified providers Integration example DAGs with Celery and k8s executor in RC. - Retested some of bug fixes - Did a quick UI sanity Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Mon, 10

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 12, 2023

Getting 404 when trying to check the changelog for every provider [image: image.png] Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 at 02:08, Ephraim Anierobi wrote: > +1 (binding) Checked expected files, licenses, signatures & SHA512 > > On 2023/07/12 19:36:33 Elad Kalif w

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 12, 2023

Thanks, Elad for letting me know. Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 at 17:09, Elad Kalif wrote: > Rahul the changelog will be published on release. it is not available yet > on the doc site. > the doc site files are merged during release > https://github.com/ap

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 12, 2023

+1 (non-binding) Tested #32568 <https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/32568> Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 at 23:03, Utkarsh Sharma wrote: > +1 non-binding > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 10:48 PM Frank Cash wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) &

Re: [VOTE] AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature

+1 (non binding) Looking forward to this. Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 at 23:27, Oliveira, Niko wrote: > Looking forward to this one! I think the new behaviours will be much > better than we have now. > > +1 (binding) > > > > ___

Re: [VOTE] PR of the Month for the Airflow Newsletter

+1 for #31712 Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 at 19:26, utkarsh sharma wrote: > +1 for #32525 > > On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 8:15 AM Mehta, Shubham > wrote: > > > +1 to #30727. Without going into details, 50-60% optimization in any > > a

Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers

Option a, Regards , Rahul Vats On Sun, 30 Jul, 2023, 08:09 Wei Lee, wrote: > [a] the providers to be regular ones, not preinstalled (non-binding) > > Best, > Wei > > > On Jul 30, 2023, at 4:47 AM, Avi > wrote: > > > > option a (non-binding) &g

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 29, 2023

Breeze, this is very helpful Thank you. Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Sun, 30 Jul 2023 at 17:28, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 (binding) - tested signatures, checksums, licences, source code for > both sdist and wheel packages. Checked all my changes - they are in. > > I also

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 05, 2023

viders-cncf-kubernetes==7.4.rc1 4. apache-airflow-providers-google==10.6.0rc1 5. apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure==6.2.4rc1 6. apache-airflow-providers-snowflake==4.4.1rc1 Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Sat, 5 Aug 2023 at 03:49, Elad Kalif wrote: > Hey all, > > > I hav

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 05, 2023

+1 (non-binding) after google provider up for RC2 Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Mon, 7 Aug 2023 at 03:01, Hussein Awala wrote: > +1 (binding) I checked the signatures, the checksums and the source code. > And I tested my changes, they are included and they work as expected. >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 11, 2023

-providers-microsoft-azure==6.2.4rc1 Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 at 16:39, Wei Lee wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Tested with our example DAGs with the following providers without > encountering issues > > apache-airflow-providers-amazon==8.5.1rc1 &g

Re: [VOTE] Restore dag_run.conf UI triggering option for 2.7.0

> > > > I would like to raise a vote about modifying the result of vote from > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/4dkbwob1wyl3xjbqdsmbd1mvgzflzp1f. > and > > > > RESTORE dagrun.conf UI option for triggering DAGs in 2.7.0 (which > means > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.7.0 from 2.7.0rc2

operators and airflow providers. 4. Tested migration works fine from 2.2.5 to 2.7.0rc2 5. Verified we see the old behavior of triggering with params when AIRFLOW__WEBSERVER__SHOW_TRIGGER_FORM_IF_NO_PARAMS is set to True 6. UI sanity 7. Tested #32052 and #33342 Regards, Rahul Vats

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 29, 2023

+1 (non binding) On Wed, 30 Aug, 2023, 18:39 Pankaj Singh, wrote: > + 1 (non-binding) > > My changes look good. > > Thanks > Pankaj > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 8:25 AM Wei Lee wrote: > > > +1 non-binding > > > > Tested with #33716 , > #33467 > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.7.1 from 2.7.1rc2

+1 (non-binding) Tested our example DAGS, looks good! Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Wed, 6 Sept 2023 at 11:09, Elad Kalif wrote: > +1 (binding) > tested several of my dags. looks good! > > On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 7:35 AM Wei Lee wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on September 08, 2023

+1 (non-binding) Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 11:37, Wei Lee wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > 1. Tested with #33825 <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/33825>, > #33822 <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/33822>, #34098 < > https://

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on September 14, 2023

+1 non binding On Fri, 15 Sep, 2023, 16:45 Phani Kumar, wrote: > +1 non-binding > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 3:45 PM Wei Lee wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Tested with the following on our example DAGs without encountering > errors. > > > > * apache-airflow-providers-amazon==8.7.1rc1 > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Pankaj Koti and Amogh Desai as committers

Congratulations Pankaj and Amogh. On Tue, 19 Sep, 2023, 20:22 Hussein Awala, wrote: > Congrats Pankaj and Amogh! > > Hussein > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 4:45 PM Andrey Anshin > wrote: > > > Congrats Pankaj! > > Congrats Amogh! > > > > > > Best Wishes > > *Andrey Anshin* > > > > > > > > On

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.7.2 from 2.7.2rc1

+1 (non-binding) Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 05:14, Jed Cunningham wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Checked signatures, checksums, licences, compared sources. Used it with the > helm chart with a few different configs >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 13, 2023

+1 (non-binding) Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 at 10:27, Akash Sharma <2akash111...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non binding) > Tested with few dags. Everything seems fine. > > Best regards, > Akash > > > On Sat, 14 Oct 2023, 01:28 Elad Kalif, w

Re: [VOTE] Add providers for Pinecone, OpenAI & Cohere to enable first-class LLMOps

+1 (non binding) On Sat, 28 Oct, 2023, 00:47 Ryan Hatter, wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 9:32 AM Oliveira, Niko > > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > looking forward to having more native LLM capabilities in Airflow! > > > > > > From: Arit

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 28, 2023

+1 (non-binding) Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 at 06:05, Wei Lee wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Best, > Wei > > > On Oct 31, 2023, at 2:16 AM, Hussein Awala wrote: > > > > +1 (binding): Checked licences, signatures, checksums, source cod

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.7.3 from 2.7.3rc1

+1 (non-binding) Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Sun, 5 Nov 2023 at 10:53, Pankaj Singh wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > my changes look good to me. > > On Sat, Nov 4, 2023 at 10:11 PM Hussein Awala wrote: > > > +1 (binding) I checked the checksums, the signa

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on November 08, 2023

-providers-databricks/5.0.0rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-ftp/3.6.1rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/10.11.1rc1/ https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure/8.2.0rc1/ Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 at 21:16

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on November 24, 2023

+1(non-binding) Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 at 13:25, Andrey Anshin wrote: > Tested my changes > > +1 (non binding) > > > Best Wishes > *Andrey Anshin* > > > > On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 at 10:30, utkarsh sharma > wrote: > > >

Re: [VOTE] November PR of the Month

+1 for #32646 Regards, Rahul Vats On Tue, 28 Nov, 2023, 09:55 Aritra Basu, wrote: > +1 to #32646 from me too > > -- > Regards, > Aritra Basu > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023, 9:50 AM Amogh Desai > wrote: > > > I vote for #32646 > > > > Great work! > &g

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 08, 2023

+1 (non-binding) except for Google, Docker and Databricks. Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 at 12:21, Pankaj Koti wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Tested my set of changes. > > Best regards, > > > On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 9:57 AM Amogh Desai > wrot

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 12, 2023

-1 (non-binding) our example DAG failing for Google and Databricks providers, We are working on fixes. - https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/10.13.0rc2/ - https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/5.1.0rc2/ Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Wed, 13

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.0 from 2.8.0rc3

degradation from version 2.7.3. Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 at 01:26, Ephraim Anierobi wrote: > Hey fellow Airflowers, > > I have cut Airflow 2.8.0rc3. This email is calling a vote on the release, > which will last at least 40 hours (accelerated voting), fr

Re: Making Listeners API non-experimental

+1 On Sat, 16 Dec, 2023, 15:26 Amogh Desai, wrote: > +1, sounds reasonable to me > > On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 at 3:25 PM, Pierre Jeambrun > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Fri 15 Dec 2023 at 17:46, Aritra Basu > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > Aritra Basu > > > > > > On Fri, Dec

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 12, 2023

+1 non-binding Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Sun, 17 Dec 2023 at 13:18, utkarsh sharma wrote: > +1 non-binding > > On Sun, 17 Dec 2023 at 1:15 PM, Pankaj Singh > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) since we have excluded google and databricks providers > > from t

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.0 from 2.8.0rc4

throughput - I do not see any degradation from version 2.7.3. Regards, Rahul Vats Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 at 16:45, Ephraim Anierobi wrote: > Hey fellow Airflowers, > > I have cut Airflow 2.8.0rc4. This email is calling a vote on the release, > which will l

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 23, 2023

+1 (non-binding) We have also tested apache-airflow-providers-weaviate==1.2.0rc1, in addition to the providers mentioned by Wei Lee. Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 at 09:17, Wei Lee wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > We've tested the following provider RCs wi

Re: [DISCUSS] Interested in joining/leaving the triage team ?

Hi Jarek, As discussed in #issue-triage, I would also like to nominate myself for the triage team. Regards, Rahul Vats On Tue, 2 Jan, 2024, 18:29 Ankit Chaurasia, wrote: > Hi Jarek, > > I would want to continue being a "collaborators" team for the triage. > > *An

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on January 07, 2024

+1 (non-binding) In addition to providers mentioned @Lee-W and also verified apache-airflow-providers-mysql==5.5.1rc1. LGTM. Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 at 15:26, Wei Lee wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > We've tested with the following providers with ou

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.1 from 2.8.1rc1

+1 (non-binding). - Verified that running our example DAGs did not reveal any regressions. - Verified installation with helm chart and running example DAGS. - Verified the API endpoints and no regressions were found. Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 00:46, Andrey

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on January 22, 2024

-mysql==5.5.2rc1 - apache-airflow-providers-cohere==1.2.0rc1 - apache-airflow-providers-pinecone==1.2.0rc1 - apache-airflow-providers-weaviate==1.3.1rc1 Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 at 09:56, Amogh Desai wrote: > +1 non binding > > Tested some exampl

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on January 30, 2024

+1 (non-binding) Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 at 12:21, Pankaj Singh wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Ran some dags and it worked fine! > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 7:55 AM Wei Lee wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Tested my

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.2 from 2.8.2rc3

he/airflow/pull/37254> 37205 <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37205> . - UI sanity. Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 at 18:06, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Small comment. I raise it here because it's been discussed in the ASF > discussions about "

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on March 04, 2024

-providers-google/10.16.0rc1 - https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-http/4.10.0rc1 Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 at 10:24, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 (binding): tested /checked my changes. Checked reproducibility, > licences, signatures, checksums - all look

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.3 from 2.8.3rc1

+1 (non-binding) Verified running example DAGS. LGTM Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 21:39, Aritra Basu wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > Tested against some test dags, don't see any regressions > > -- > Regards, > Aritra Basu > > On Sat, Mar

Re: [VOTE] AIP-59 Performance testing framework

+1 (non- binding) On Tue, 12 Mar, 2024, 23:40 Bartosz Jankiewicz, wrote: > Hi folks, > > The AIP for performance testing has been in review for quite some time and > I've included your feedback in the document. > > I'd like to call a vote, and if you agree I'd start a development of the > framew

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.4 from 2.8.4rc1

+1 (non-binding) Verified running our regression DAGS and API tests. LGTM Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 at 15:24, Hussein Awala wrote: > +1 (binding) checked licences, checksums, signatures, and source codes, and > ran some testing dags. All looks good. > >

Re: [VOTE] AIP-64: Keep TaskInstance try history

+1 (non-binding) Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 at 22:46, Jed Cunningham wrote: > Hello Airflow Community, > > I would like to start a vote on AIP-64: Keep TaskInstance try history. > > You can find the AIP here: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluenc

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.9.0 from 2.9.0rc1

-1 (non-binding) I am unable to downgrade from version 2.9.0rc1 to 2.8.4 after upgrading. Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 at 13:55, Amogh Desai wrote: > Btw, these links are wrong. Instead refer this: > > 1. For PMC: > > https://github.com/apache/airflo

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.9.0 from 2.9.0rc1

ters) sqlalchemy.exc.ProgrammingError: (psycopg2.errors.UndefinedColumn) column task_instance_1.task_display_name does not exist LINE 1: ...tance_1.try_number AS task_instance_1_try_number, task_insta... ^ Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 at 16:14, Hussein

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.9.0 from 2.9.0rc2

. Regards, Rahul Vats On Sat, 6 Apr 2024 at 16:15, Bolke de Bruin wrote: > +1 binding > > Deployed here no issues found. > > Bolke > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 5 Apr 2024, at 19:02, Jed Cunningham > wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.9.0 from 2.9.0rc3

+1 (non-binding) Verified running example DAGs and performed UI sanity. LGTM! Regards, Rahul Vats On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 09:43, Amogh Desai wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > I was able to install the RC seamlessly and ran a few example DAGs > along with a few random UI testing

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Wei Lee

Congrats Wei, very well deserved! Regards, Rahul Vats On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 14:27, Amogh Desai wrote: > Many congratulations, Wei! > > Welcome onboard! > > Thanks & Regards, > Amogh Desai > > > On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 2:26 PM, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 10, 2024

+1 (non-binding) Verified running our example DAGS Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 at 12:35, Amogh Desai wrote: > +1 non binding > > Installed and RC with breeze and tested my changes: > - Setting use_beeline by default for hive cli connection (#38763)

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 12, 2024

+1 (non-binding ) for Amazon, google, and azure verified our example dags worked fine. Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Tue, 14 May 2024 at 09:45, Wei Lee wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Test a few examples DAGs with Amazon, google, and azure providers without > encountering issu

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 26, 2024

-1 (non-binding) for cncf-kubernetes-provider. Our example DAGs are failing due to an unexpected argument 'pod' in the read_namespaced_pod_log call. Thanks to Wei for raising the fix PR <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39874>. Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Mon, 27 M

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on June 07, 2024

+1 (non-binding) Verified running our example DAG. Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Sat, 8 Jun 2024 at 14:13, Ephraim Anierobi wrote: > +1 (binding) checked reproducibility, licenses, signatures & checksum > > On Sat, 8 Jun 2024 at 09:24, rom sharon wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.9.2 from 2.9.2rc1

+1 (non-binding). Verified running our example DAGs. LGTM Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Sun, 9 Jun 2024 at 01:21, Scheffler Jens (XC-AS/EAE-ADA-T) wrote: > +1 non binding > > Sent from Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> > > From

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Helm Chart 1.14.0 based on 1.14.0rc1

+1 non binding Installed chart with kind cluster and verified running example dags. LGTM! Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 at 13:19, Ephraim Anierobi wrote: > +1 binding > > Confirmed reproducibility, licenses, checksums, and signatures. It looks > good

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on June 22, 2024

+1 non-binding. Verified running some example dags. LGTM! Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 at 09:41, Amogh Desai wrote: > +1 non binding > > Tested some example dags in cncf and hive providers. My changes work well > too! > > Thanks & Regards, > Amog

Re: [VOTE] June 2024 PR of the Month

+1 for #39355. Regards, Rahul Vats On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 at 15:20, utkarsh sharma wrote: > +1 for #39355. Finally, I don't have to use Mac's night shift to run > airflow. > > Thanks, > Utkarsh Sharma > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 12:19 PM Wei Lee wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 02, 2024 (openlineage rc2)

+1 (non-binding) Verified with our example DAGs. Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Wed, 3 Jul 2024 at 14:30, Maciej Obuchowski wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Verified by running some example DAGs. > > wt., 2 lip 2024 o 18:16 Jarek Potiuk napisał(a): > > > Hey all, >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 12, 2024

+1 for Weaviate provider, verified running our example DAGS. Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Sun, 14 Jul 2024 at 01:44, Hussein Awala wrote: > +1 (binding) checked licences, checksums, signatures, and sources and > tested my changes. All looks good. > > On Sat, Jul 13, 2024 at 6

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.9.3 from 2.9.3rc1

+1 (non-binding): Verified running regression example DAG. Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 at 18:20, Ephraim Anierobi wrote: > +1 binding: Checked reproducibility, checksums and licenses > > On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 at 13:21, Kaxil Naik wrote: > > > +1 bind

Re: [VOTE] AIP-66: DAG Bundles and Parsing

+1 (non-binding) Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 at 02:14, Jed Cunningham wrote: > I’m calling for a vote on this AIP 66: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/ZIqSEQ > > Discussion thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/l8ksl144xd43jfk1wk3kz77t1xgbbq

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.10.0 from 2.10.0rc1

endpoints and found no regressions. Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 at 00:02, Scheffler Jens (XC-AS/EAE-ADA-T) wrote: > Hi, > > I did extensive tests of the release and besides a small bug in UI (which > I rate non-blocking) did not find any problem. Smooth transi

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 19, 2024

. https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-openai/1.3.0rc1/ Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 at 09:21, Amogh Desai wrote: > +1 non binding > > Ran some example dags for > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/8.4.0rc1/ > and >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow 2.11 as bridge release

+1 (non-binding). Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Sat, 7 Sept 2024 at 01:45, Pavankumar Gopidesu wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Regards, > Pavan > > On Sat, Sep 7, 2024, 09:36 Buğra Öztürk wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Best regards, > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Vikram Koka

Congratulations Vikram! Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 at 23:33, Elad Kalif wrote: > Congrats Vikram! > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 1:29 PM rom sharon wrote: > > > Many congrats Vikram!!! > > > > ‫בתאריך יום א׳, 20 באוק׳ 2024 ב-11:57

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.10.3 from 2.10.3rc2

+1 non-binding - Checked running DAGs with CeleryExecutor and KubernetesExecutor. Regards, Rahul Vats On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 at 23:52, Jens Scheffler wrote: > +1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Reproducible package build, Licenses, > Signatures > > As with RC1 checked the issue ticked and

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on September 21, 2024

+1(non-binding) for openai. Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Tue, 24 Sept 2024 at 07:43, Jed Cunningham wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Checked reproducibility, signatures, checksums, licences. >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on September 27, 2024

+1 non binding Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Mon, 30 Sept 2024 at 09:33, Amogh Desai wrote: > +1 non binding > > Tested some example jobs. No regressions. > > Thanks & Regards, > Amogh Desai > > > On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 9:27 PM Vishnu Chilukoori < &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.10.2 from 2.10.2rc1

+1 (non-binding). Verified running example DAG'S LGTM! Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Wed, 18 Sept 2024 at 15:24, Vishnu Chilukoori wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > > -- > Regards > Vishnu Chilukoori > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2024, 15:03 Wei Lee wrote: > > &g

Re: 📢 Apache Airflow 3.0.0apha2 is available for testing! 🎉

Awesome! We have started testing mapped tasks with Alpha2. Regards, Rahul Vats On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 at 15:01, Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > The big new part of AIP-72 (Task Execution Interface) that was included in > this Alpha was mapped tasks — so you should now be able to use and test &g

Re: 📢 Apache Airflow 3.0.0apha1 is available for testing! 🎉

where we can share testing updates and details. I request everyone to join the channel for better collaboration. Best regards, Rahul Vats

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.10.4 from 2.10.4rc1

+1 non-binding, Tested with example DAGs. LGTM! Regards, Rahul Vats On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 at 10:58, Pavankumar Gopidesu wrote: > +1 non-binding, > > Tested few examples dags. Looks fine. > > Regards, > Pavan Kumar > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2024, 05:20 Amogh Desai wro

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.10.5 from 2.10.5rc1

+1 non-binding, Tested with example DAGs. LGTM! Regards, Rahul Vats On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 at 22:25, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > FIY: I updated constraints for 2.10.5rc1 to include the new fab-provider > 1.5.3 and Flask App Builder 4.5.3 containing bugs/security fixes. I also > regenerated t

Re: [DISCUSS]: Proposing a "common message queue" abstraction

+1, looking forward to it. Regards, Rahul On Thu, 13 Feb, 2025, 03:00 Vikram Koka, wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I created the following (very early) draft PR > to introduce and socialize > the concept of a "Common Message Queue" abstraction, similar

Re: [DISCUSS] Tests structure for providers

will help maintain the new structure and prevent regressions. 3. For the naming, I’d prefer using unit instead of provider_tests to keep it more intuitive and consistent with system and integration. This makes the structure self-explanatory and easier for new contributors. Regards, R

Re: New committers: Shubham Raj, Buğra Öztürk, LIU ZHE YOU, Kalyan Reddy !

Congratulations, well deserved, everyone! Regards, Rahul Vats On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 at 17:35, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Wooo Hooo Hooo! > > In the midst of the Airflow 3 frenzy we had the opportunity to get a lot of > contributions. And we had time to discu

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 3.0.0 from 3.0.0rc4 & Task SDK 1.0.0 from 1.0.0rc4

+1 (non-binding). Verified all AIPs and regression tests: - Running example DAGs - API - CLI Thanks, everyone, for all the development and testing efforts—cheers to Airflow 3! Regards, Rahul Vats On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 at 13:47, Amogh Desai wrote: > +1 non binding. > > Had

Re: [DISCUSS] Time to say goodbye to the old UI?

+1 for this! The new UI is the way to go, and as more people start using it, it provides a great opportunity to identify and address any existing gaps. Regards, Rahul Vats 9953794332 On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 at 09:41, Amogh Desai wrote: > Big +1!! > > It is not easy to maintain the old UI

Re: [VOTE] February 2025 PR of the Month

+1 for https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/46939 Regards, Rahul Vats On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 at 15:26, Pierre Jeambrun wrote: > +1 for https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/46939 > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 6:01 AM Amogh Desai > wrote: > > > +1 for https://github.co

Re: New committer: Rahul Vats

Thank you, everyone. It is great to be part of the team. I truly appreciate all the guidance and support from the community. Regards, Rahul Vats On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 at 13:43, Shahar Epstein wrote: > Congratulation Rahul! :) > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025, 21:20 Jed Cunningham > wrot

Re: [ANNOUNCE] dag.test now uses Task SDK execution path

This is great! Thank you, Kaxil. Regards, Rahul Vats On Sat, 10 May 2025 at 10:14, Pavankumar Gopidesu wrote: > Great, Thanks kaxil. > > Pavan > > On Sat, May 10, 2025, 02:52 Aritra Basu wrote: > > > 🙌 Woohoo! > > -- > > Regards, > > Aritra Basu &

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 3.0.1 from 3.0.1rc1 & Task SDK 1.0.1 from 1.0.1rc1

+1(Non-binding), verified running regression DAGs, and all work well. Regards, Rahul Vats On Sat, 10 May 2025 at 22:38, Bryan Corder wrote: > +1 Non-binding Ran it on my Dev cluster with no regressions > > On Sat, May 10, 2025, 9:13 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > > > +1 bind

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Staging system for docs - including latest Provider wave

This is amazing. Thanks Jarek. Regards, Rahul Vats On Fri, 16 May 2025 at 17:14, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > I am particularly happy with the watermark :). It's clear when you are > looking at the staging docs :) > > [image: image.png] > > On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 7:43 AM Jare

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.11.0 from 2.11.0rc1

Wei, the migration Issue <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/50745> is only specific to SQLite, right? Regards, Rahul Vats On Sun, 18 May 2025 at 11:41, Wei Lee wrote: > -1 (non-binding) > > Encountered a few issues during testing `airflow db migrate` with 2.11.0rc1 >

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.11.0 from 2.11.0rc1

+1 (non-binding), verified running example DAGs all work fine. Regards, Rahul Vats On Mon, 19 May 2025 at 18:54, Wei Lee wrote: > Changing my vote to +1. Thanks > > Best, > Wei > > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 8:38 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: > > > @weilee...@gmail.com :

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Task Execution API Versioning Strategy

Thank You, Kaxil and Amogh. Regards, Rahul Vats On Thu, 15 May 2025 at 12:09, Amogh Desai wrote: > Thank you Kaxil. > > It is helpful for contributors to understand things too and for prevent > committers > from accidentally merging such PRs as we work on a precommit / CI test t

Re: [VOTE] AIP-90 Human in the loop

+1 binding Regards, Rahul Vats On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 at 11:26, Phani Kumar wrote: > +1 binding > > On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 7:13 AM kalyan reddy wrote: > > > +1 binding. > > > > From: Aritra Basu > > Sent: 05 June 2025

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 3.0.2 from 3.0.2rc2 & Task SDK 1.0.2 from 1.0.2rc2

+1 non binding. Tried running example dags all looks good. Regards, Rahul Vats On Mon, 9 Jun, 2025, 11:52 Amogh Desai, wrote: > @Jarek Potiuk I agree with you. We should have a > separate doc for task sdk related verification and testing > sometime. Not urgent, but we can try to ge

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Amogh Desai

This is great news, well deserved. Regards, Rahul Vats On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 at 15:53, Phani Kumar wrote: > Congrats Amogh, well deserved ! > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 3:52 PM Pavankumar Gopidesu < > gopidesupa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Woohoo th

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 3.0.3 from 3.0.3rc6 & Task SDK 1.0.3 from 1.0.3rc6

+1(non-binding). We tried running our regression example DAGs and migration. All looks great to me. Regards, Rahul Vats On Mon, 14 Jul 2025 at 17:33, Buğra Öztürk wrote: > +1 non-binding, tested with some dags, looks good > > On Mon, 14 Jul 2025, 14:52 Pavankumar Gopidesu, > wro

Re: [VOTE] June 2025 PR of the Month

My vote goes to #51153 as well. Great doc work. Regards, Rahul Vats On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 18:03, Kaxil Naik wrote: > (And yeah a big shoutout to IIy Egorov too for a lot of discussions around > locking, async vs sync etc > > On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 18:00, Kaxil Naik wrote: > &

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] June 2025 PR of the Month

Congratulations Ankit. Regards, Rahul Vats On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 at 12:27, Amogh Desai wrote: > 👏 Congratulations Ankit. > > Thanks & Regards, > Amogh Desai > > > On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 12:01 PM Ankit Chaurasia > wrote: > > > Thank you, everyone. The task-s