-1 (non-binding)

We have tested our example DAGS with the below providers and with
*apache-airflow-providers-google==10.6.0rc1
*our Dataproc Example DAGS giving an import error due to this change
<https://github.com/apache/airflow/commit/1ea7ae809bf0b8d1c8edf97e4d456b3753a1feca#diff-859a8e37202c3c77bbdd2e6992a3d406c00be015b0b4aef446d24dc2c8a3096cR34>

We are Importing *DATAPROC_JOB_LOG_LINK*, however, in the latest release it
has been changed to *DATAPROC_JOB_LINK.*

1. apache-airflow-providers-amazon==8.5.0rc1

2. apache-airflow-providers-apache-hive==6.1.4rc1

3. apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes==7.4.rc1

4. apache-airflow-providers-google==10.6.0rc1

5. apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure==6.2.4rc1

6. apache-airflow-providers-snowflake==4.4.1rc1

Regards,
Rahul Vats
9953794332


On Sat, 5 Aug 2023 at 03:49, Elad Kalif <elad...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hey all,
>
>
> I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
> calling a vote on the release,
>
> which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on August 07,
> 2023 22:16 UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received.
>
>
>
> Consider this my (binding) +1.
>
>
> Airflow Providers are available at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
>
>
> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
>
>  Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the provider
> packages.
>
>
> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
>
>  Python "wheel" release.
>
>
> The test procedure for PMC members is described in
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
>
>
> The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC is
> described in:
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
>
>
>
> Public keys are available at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
>
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
>
> [ ] +1 approve
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
>
>
> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community are
>
> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
>
>
> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
>
> This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
>
> the artifact checksums when we actually release.
>
>
> The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
>
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/33132
>
>
> You can find packages as well as detailed changelog following the below
> links:
>
>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/8.5.0rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-drill/2.4.3rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-hive/6.1.4rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-spark/4.1.3rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-sqoop/4.0.0rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-asana/2.2.2rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-celery/3.3.1rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/7.4.1rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-common-sql/1.6.2rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-docker/3.7.2rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-ftp/3.5.0rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/10.6.0rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-imap/3.3.0rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure/6.2.3rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-mysql/5.2.1rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-openlineage/1.0.1rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-redis/3.3.1rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-smtp/1.3.0rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/4.4.1rc1/
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Elad Kalif
>

Reply via email to