Many many congratulations, Pankaj! 🥳
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023, 11:29 Ephraim Anierobi
wrote:
> Congratulations!
>
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 at 03:05, Phani Kumar .invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > Congrats Pankaj!
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 7:17 AM Wei Lee wrote:
> >
> > > Congrats Pankaj! 🎉
> > >
> > > >
Hello Jarek,
Please count me in.
My GitHub id is @amoghrajesh.
Thanks,
Amogh Desai
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023, 15:03 Ankit Chaurasia wrote:
> Hi Jarek,
>
> Please count me in. My GitHub id is sunank200 <
> https://github.com/sunank200>
>
> Regards,
> *Ankit Chaurasia*
&
+1 (non binding)
Tested my changes (mostly UI) here along with a few test DAGs. Looks good.
Thanks,
Amogh
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 1:11 PM Pankaj Singh
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Tested my changes around CLI/REST-API/KE looks good.
>
> Thank you
> Pankaj
>
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 5:11 AM Ja
Hello Arvind,
Can you help us with more details? Like screenshots, how to repro, etc?
This will help in identifying the issue and helping in fixing it.
Thanks,
Amogh
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023, 10:50 Arvind Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While running DAG task id is not showing in Air flow UI , request yo
Wow! Congrats!!
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023, 11:48 Pankaj Koti
wrote:
> Amazing news at the start of the day!
>
> Very well deserved all of them, Vincent, Phani and Maciej!!
> Congratulations! Keep helping us and the community :)
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Pankaj Koti
>
> *Senior Software Engineer, *OSS
👏👏
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023, 21:41 Jed Cunningham wrote:
> Dear Airflow community,
>
> I am pleased to announce that we have released Apache Airflow Helm chart
> 1.10.0 🎉 🎊
>
> The source release, as well as the "binary" Helm Chart release, are
> available:
>
> 📦 Official Sources:
>
> https://airf
Congratulations!!
On Tue, Jul 4, 2023, 22:51 Pankaj Koti
wrote:
> 🎉 Many congratulations Dennis !! 🎉
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Pankaj Koti
>
> *Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
> Location: Pune, India
>
> Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
>
> Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
>
>
+1 (non binding)
Started airflow successfully and tested out dags I've been working on
Thanks,
Amogh Desai
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023, 17:39 Pankaj Singh wrote:
> + 1 (non-binding)
>
> ran some example dags and checked some UI behaviour in the airflow docker
> rc image.
>
>
+1 (non binding)
Looks like an interesting work to be done!
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023, 00:12 Collin McNulty
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> My only concern is confusion between DAG.on_sla_miss_callback and the
> deprecated DAG.sla_miss_callback due to their very similar names, but I
> don't have a bet
Good idea overall.
I am also aligned towards moving it out of `db` subcommand. I am not very
much aligned towards using the keyword/action word - `upgrade`. It sets a
different context.
Thanks,
Amogh Desai
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 1:02 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> +1 for moving it un
I agree with migrate as well!
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023, 22:37 Jed Cunningham wrote:
> I like migrate as well.
>
Awesome news! Good going, Hussein!
Congratulations 🎉
Thanks,
Amogh Desai
On Sat, Jul 29, 2023, 23:04 Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Hello Airflow Community,
>
> I have the pleasure to announce that The Project Management Committee
> (PMC) for Apache Airflow has invited Hussein Awala to b
I also think that these operators should not be pre installed.
I vote for option (a)
Thanks,
Amogh Desai
On Sun, Jul 30, 2023, 09:22 rahul Vats wrote:
> Option a,
>
>
> Regards ,
> Rahul Vats
>
> On Sun, 30 Jul, 2023, 08:09 Wei Lee, wrote:
>
> > [a] the pro
+1 (non binding)
Tested out cncf provider:
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/7.4.0rc1 with
few examples DAGs. No regressions.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Sun, Jul 30, 2023 at 9:56 PM utkarsh sharma
wrote:
> +1 non binding. Tested apprise provider
for intel machines and not just ARM
installations. Ref:
https://github.com/cython/cython/issues/5541#issuecomment-1641654183
Also, not sure if this can be fixed by constraining Cython, see thread:
https://discuss.python.org/t/no-way-to-pin-build-dependencies/29833/21
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desa
This certainly is some good news.
@utkarsh I cannot see the attachment too. I would like to volunteer to help
you here too in case you need it.
Thanks,
Amogh Desai
On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 1:20 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> No attachment (our devlist blocked it I think:). But happy to see it
>
+1 non binding
Tested a few example DAGs - mostly on CNCF providers. Works as expected.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 4:34 PM Phani Kumar
wrote:
> +1 non binding
>
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 4:29 PM Pankaj Koti
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
Sure, I have initiated a conversation with you over Slack.
Thanks,
Amogh Desai
On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 9:47 PM utkarsh sharma
wrote:
> @Jarek Thanks, didn't know the attachments are blocked.
>
> Also, I'll try to isolate the new and old SCSS file.
>
> On Mon, Aug 7
+1 non binding.
No regressions from the previous RC2.
CNCF providers are running fine.
Thanks,
Amogh Desai
On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 9:10 PM Pankaj Koti
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding).
>
> I concur with Wei.
>
> Thank you Elad for your efforts with multiple rounds on this provider
Hi,
Was able to run RC2 within breeze env. Ran my set of dags on it - regular
dags and dags with operators. Doesn't look like there is any regression
introduced.
+1 (non binding)
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023, 17:14 Pankaj Koti
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> Used the RC2 with
Great!
This is awesome news.
Thanks,
Amogh
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023, 21:48 Vikram Koka
wrote:
> Awesome!
> Great work team, this is definitely one of the biggest new Airflow
> releases!
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 9:16 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
>
> > Great!
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 6:08 PM
need to consider having
MYSQL as an option and should design the scripts/docs accordingly.
There are some good wikis out there like:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Microsoft_SQL_Server_to_PostgreSQL_Migration_by_Ian_Harding.
Hence, having a script shouldn't be too hard either.
Thanks,
+1 (non binding)
All my changes were localised to the cncf provider and I have tested it and
it works as expected. No regressions.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 3:59 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> +1 (binding) . Checked signatures, checksums, licences, source code.
&g
+1 non binding
Based on previous discussions.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023, 13:03 Wei Lee wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best,
> Wei
>
> > On Aug 28, 2023, at 3:30 PM, Pankaj Koti
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
Wasn't aware of things done by @eumiro
Awesome. My vote goes to https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/30259
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023, 08:35 Mehta, Shubham
wrote:
> I'm with Hussein on this, +1 to #30259. Can't wait to see the efficiency
>
+1 non binding.
Thanks,
Amogh Desai
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023, 21:25 Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> +1 (binding): checked licences, sources, checksums, signatures. Re-checked
> my changes. All looks good.
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 3:14 PM Rahul Vats wrote:
>
> > +1 (non binding)
&
Going through the discussions above, I was leaning towards the idea of
removing it completely initially but came across Pierre's idea after. I
like that!
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 1:58 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Whoa.. I am glad I started it... I see some
ation: Semantic versioning helps communicate the
impact of a release to users, maintainers, and contributors. Without
clear versioning, understanding the significance of a release becomes
more difficult.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 3:56 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
>
+1 non binding
I tested some of my example dags on the RC. Things seem to work fine.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Wed, Sep 6, 2023, 14:35 Avi
wrote:
> +1 non binding
>
> > On Wednesday, Sep 06, 2023 at 09:01, Hussein Awala (mailto:huss...@awala.fr)> wrote:
> &g
Assuming that we need to vote in this thread, I think it completely makes
sense to do so. Given that no issues have been reported adds more to my
decision.
+1 non binding from me.
Thanks,
Amogh Desai
On Fri, Sep 8, 2023, 13:49 Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> One small thing: just make sure to
I didn't have many changes this time but I tested out by running a few
dags, mostly on cncf provider and they work as expected.
+1 non binding
Thanks,
Amogh Desai
On Sun, Sep 10, 2023, 03:41 Hussein Awala wrote:
> I checked the signatures, the checksums, the licences and the source c
+1 non binding
Tested with a few dags from my test set. No regression from the last RC.
Thanks,
Amogh Desai
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023, 15:19 Pankaj Koti
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Our astronomer-providers (async) DBT DAG based on the provider RC2 ran
> fine.
>
> Regards,
&
& Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 11:25 PM Mehta, Shubham wrote:
> Thank you for taking the time to summarize the workshop and provide
> details around all the discussions we had. I appreciate you and Julien
> taking ownership and driving it. I also really liked the transpar
Tested out my changes: Defining priorityClasses for airflow services and
workers (#31615) and Ability to inject extra containers into pgbouncer
(#33686).
Changes seem to work as expected.
+1 (non binding)
Thanks,
Amogh Desai
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 5:10 AM Jed Cunningham
wrote:
> Hello Apa
+1 non binding
Tested by changes #31615 and #33686. They work as expected. No regressions
from the previous RC
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 12:32 AM Hussein Awala wrote:
> +1 (binding) I checked the license and signature, all looks good except the
> `Chart.
Hi,
The key takeaways from summit link is broken. Can you check?
Thanks,
Amogh Desai
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023, 05:39 Apache Airflow Newsletter
wrote:
> Recent releases and happenings in the Airflow community
>
> View this email in your browser (
> https://mailchi.mp/c490ab71a481/ap
+1 (non binding)
Tested out some DAGs, things seem ok
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Sat, Oct 14, 2023, 07:53 Wei Lee wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Tested with our examples DAGs with only one expected fail due to Azure
> provider breaking change.
>
> Best
> Wei
&g
+1 non binding
Tested few test DAGs with cncf mostly.
Thanks,
Amogh
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023, 10:53 Aritra Basu wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> --
> Regards,
> Aritra Basu
>
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2023, 9:17 AM cary hawkins
> wrote:
>
> > +1 non-binding
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > > On Oct 18, 2
e)
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 5:10 PM Hussein Awala wrote:
> This AIP will have a great positive impact on the project:
> - Airflow will be increasingly used as a scheduler for ML projects.
> - Simplifying the file transfer operators by replacing them with a s
happy to help when we start taking this forward, I have
some experience in airflow-site and docs side as well. Feel free to reach
out over email or slack :)
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 3:08 AM Aritra Basu
wrote:
> This definitely sounds like something that need
+1 from me as well. Looks like something that the dev community would be
interested in using and hence contributing as well!
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 2:37 AM utkarsh sharma
wrote:
> +1 From my side as well. Also, having a dashboard to publish system test
&g
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 4:41 PM Phani Kumar
wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023, 16:39 utkarsh sharma, wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Utkarsh Sharma
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 4:10 PM, Pankaj Koti
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > On
aintain it :)
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 4:13 PM Kaxil Naik wrote:
> Yeah agreed, I don’t think it is worth keeping the support of MSSQL given
> the amount of usage vs the maintenance effort required.
>
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 at 23:07, Jarek Potiuk wr
ing that we will
> remove MsSQL as planned (condition for that is that we describe a viable
> migration path for MsSQL users).
>
> J.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 1:23 PM Amogh Desai
> wrote:
>
>> I agree with the comments and where this discussion has led to.
>
t spend a lot of time and effort on this, because this
might be
a temporary workaround.
Is there anything that we can do about 2.7.2 which is already released?
Might be too late in the game. We might have to clearly document this so
that users
don't have this experience at all.
Thanks,
Amogh
Go ahead Utkarsh. It would be nice to work with you along this.
Thanks,
Amogh Desai
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 10:02 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> +1. I think no-one will object to improve the current situation :)
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 5:02 PM utkarsh sharma
> wrote:
>
&
pointed out
* I feel that we do not have questions around scale and frequency (more so)
that DAGs are run, we can add those
* We should also discuss "other" options people use, if not airflow and why?
Thanks Andrey and Jarek, I agree with both of your points.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh
Yeah, excellent team!
Utkarsh note that I will be on vacation from today till Nov 6. I should be
able to help after that :)
Even during this period i will have slack on mobile, so I can help
asynchronously if needed.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023, 14:22 Jarek Po
the newsletter.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023, 21:37 Pierre Jeambrun wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I like the idea of highlighting more than just 1 PR in the "PR of the month
> section", especially when we have a hard time deciding between a few good
+1 for 34729 from me.
Good work 👍
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023, 21:40 Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> +1 to 34729 as well.
>
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 6:38 PM Constance Martineau
> wrote:
>
> > Oh, I'm very sorry. I had forgotten about 34729. Apologies, but I'll be
> > changing my vote to that.
> >
> > On Tue,
Looks like we arrived at the edge case of one clear winner this time around
👍
On Wed, Nov 1, 2023, 20:40 Briana Okyere
wrote:
> Thank you all!
>
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 7:23 AM Josh Fell .invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > Joining the party for 34279 as well!
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 8:22 AM Pie
Count me in to analyze the results as well, Briana.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Fri, Nov 3, 2023, 00:12 Aritra Basu wrote:
> Ooh, sounds fun. Count me in!
>
> --
> Regards,
> Aritra Basu
>
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2023, 10:05 PM Briana Okyere
> wrote:
>
> &
Wooho! Many congratulations, Jens!
On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 at 12:54 AM, Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Airflow
> has invited Jens Scheffler to become a committer and we are pleased
> to announce that they have accepted.
>
> Jens has been contributing for a num
+1 non binding.
Tested out some test DAGs, mostly around CNCF provider:
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/7.9.0rc1/,
no regression found.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 6:49 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> +1 (binding) - checked
with this kind of a change
coming in.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 at 11:40 AM, Wei Lee wrote:
> Agreed, as long as users can still use different versions through tags,
> there are no drawbacks or incompatibilities with this great idea!
>
> Best,
> Wei
&g
Theres very little incentive in maintaining this if theres no one actively
maintaining it.
I am totally for the removal +1
On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 at 1:21 AM, Collin McNulty
wrote:
> +1 for removal
>
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 1:43 PM Hussein Awala wrote:
>
> > > we would do it branching off at t
face like:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/33442.
These are a few of my thoughts, glad to finally see someone bring this up!
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 7:22 AM Andrey Anshin
wrote:
> Hey guys! Thanks for all your feedback and suggestions.
>
> I
neral,
supporting the use case of serializing the Airflow connection on basis of
host, port, schema, password, type etc.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 9:56 PM Daniel Standish
wrote:
> >
> > I still think different people have different expectations o
+1 with removal.
As long as users are able to continue with the last released version of the
operator,
I do not see any issues with the removal.
Thanks Andrey for the metrics too. Makes the case stronger.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 2:58 PM Jarek Potiuk w
+1 let us remove it.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 9:09 AM Aritra Basu
wrote:
> +1
>
> --
> Regards,
> Aritra Basu
>
> On Sat, Nov 25, 2023, 6:40 AM Wei Lee wrote:
>
> > +1 for removing it.
> >
> > Best,
> > Wei
+1 non binding.
Tested some of my example DAGs, mostly around
apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes
& apache-airflow-providers-apache-impala.
Things seem to be working fine.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 9:52 AM Wei Lee wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
I vote for #32646
Great work!
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 5:41 AM Wei Lee wrote:
> + 1 for 32646
>
> Best,
> Wei
>
> > On Nov 28, 2023, at 5:35 AM, utkarsh sharma
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 for 32646, great work.
> >
> &g
Agree with @Daniel Standish on this.
We should rename get_uri to reduce confusion.
I am fine with renaming to to_uri_repr and then deprecating get_uri
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 8:56 PM Andrey Anshin
wrote:
> > Recently, a method was added `to_json_d
not)
* We should have a minutes of meeting doc, which is readable by all,
editable by few
* Record and probably attached in every month's newsletter(?)
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 4:00 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> As Briana wrote - yeah I also think it's
This is fantastic! Congratulations Utkarsh.
Well deserved!
Thanks & Best Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 10:56 PM, Pankaj Singh
wrote:
> Congratulations Utkarsh 🎉
>
> On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 10:45 PM Aritra Basu
> wrote:
>
> > Amazing
Thanks for taking this up, Jarek.
I left a few comments on the pull request already.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 5:24 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Hey here,
>
> In parallel to the serialisation discussion, I also wanted to make sure we.
> raise the to
a
senior member who
has done it before. This will not only enhance the process but also be a
"training" period for interested
folks.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 12:58 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Just to add on it - yeah - formal "shadowing" is not
+1 non binding for all the other providers other than Google and Docker.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 5:46 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> +1 (binding) for all providers except Google, an Docker where bugs were
> found as noted in the Github Issue.
>
> BTW. I
Amazing! Love how this shaped up :)
Agenda looks great.
On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 at 9:41 PM, Briana Okyere
wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> I brought up the concept of launching a Virtual Town Hall in the New Year,
> and it seemed like enough folks were interested to move forward.
>
> Link to thread: <
> https
+1, sounds reasonable to me
On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 at 3:25 PM, Pierre Jeambrun
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri 15 Dec 2023 at 17:46, Aritra Basu wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Aritra Basu
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 15, 2023, 8:47 PM Vincent Beck wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On 2023/12/15 12:51:26
+1 non binding
On Sun, 17 Dec 2023 at 4:05 PM, Bolke de Bruin wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> Let's get this out.
>
> B
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 17 Dec 2023, at 09:20, Rahul Vats wrote:
> >
> > +1 non-binding
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rahul Vats
> > 9953794332
> >
> >
> >> On Sun, 17 Dec 2023 at 13
Awesome! 🤩
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 at 1:35 AM, Bolke de Bruin wrote:
> 🥳
>
> B.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 18 Dec 2023, at 20:11, Kaxil Naik wrote:
> >
> > That's awesome 🎉
> >
> >> On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 at 00:39, Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> >>
> >> Wooohooo!
> >>
> >>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 8:05
+1 non binding
Installed the RC bits and ran example DAGs.
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 at 5:22 PM, Phani Kumar
wrote:
> +1 non binding
>
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 5:10 PM Pankaj Koti
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Installed the RC and was able to trigger a DAG successfully using the
> > cli
that the comments won't be ignored.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 5:11 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Dennis:
>
> > I guess as long as we are not dictating that the person who left the
> comment has to resolve it, then I'm alright with trying this
Thanks for your message, Jarek.
We can try it out since year ends are low traffic periods, we get some
experimental phase with this.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 7:45 PM Aritra Basu
wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification Jarek, I see the value in it. It'
knowledge to
consider joining this fantastic program. It's a chance to make a
difference, learn, and be part of an awesome community.
Feel free to reach out if you have any questions.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 3:26 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> The fellowsh
had to pass it on :).
> That's cool. I think we should be more vocal about those kinds of
> mentorships / internships. This is really cool that there are such
> opportunities out there :).
>
> J,.
>
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 1:41 PM Amogh Desai
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
+1 non binding for providers apart from weavite
Tested few dags around cncf provider mainly. Could not see any regressions.
Thanks,
Amogh
On Sat, 30 Dec 2023 at 4:08 PM, Pankaj Singh
wrote:
> + 1 (non-binding)
>
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 2:24 PM Wei Lee wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding) for provi
trying to fix a problem that is
not too problematic.
Again, only a personal choice but not against it. If it makes lives of the
stakeholders involved easier, I am all up for it!
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Sat, 30 Dec 2023 at 2:35 PM, Pierre Jeambrun
wrote:
> I like the idea, but in p
Wooho! Looking to see how this turns out for airflow 😃
On Sat, 30 Dec 2023 at 1:35 PM, Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> As discussed in
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/cs6mcvpn2lk9w2p4oz43t20z3fg5nl7l I just
> enabled "require conversation resolution" for our main/stable branches. We
+1 non binding
Tested if the RC is fine with other providers. Things look good 👍
On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 at 10:01 PM, Phani Kumar
wrote:
> +1 non binding.
>
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 9:48 PM Hussein Awala wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 5:14 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> >
>
My vote goes to #35719. Having a nice UI fix come in, that too from a first
time contributor
makes it a winner for me!
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 7:51 AM Wei Lee wrote:
> I want to vote for https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35926, and
> thank Jarek fo
/community about the same.
One way to avoid the non vendor neutrality problem would be to keep this
(future) team/role have one / two
members from various stakeholders.
Thanks for bringing this up, Michael.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 5:21 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> I am
e criteria here.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 2:14 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> * we have to know the candidate - they have to be either a committer
> or someone who has contributed a lot and we know who the person is.
> Stakeholders and community members tha
+1 non binding
Tested few changes around cncf provider. No regressions
On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 at 8:36 PM, Pankaj Koti
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Concurring with Rahul and Wei!
>
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2024, 18:55 Rahul Vats, wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > In addition to providers mentioned @Lee
Congrats Andrey!!
On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 at 12:08 AM, Hussein Awala wrote:
> Congratulations Andrey, very well deserved!
>
> On Mon 15 Jan 2024 at 19:35, Jarek Potiuk wrote:
>
> > I have the pleasure to announce that The Project Management Committee
> > (PMC) for Apache Airflow has invited Andrey
This is good stuff!
+1 non binding
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 9:31 AM Abhishek Bhakat
wrote:
> +1 non binding
>
> > On 17-Jan-2024, at 03:01, Aritra Basu wrote:
> >
> > +1 non binding
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > A
.
One suggestion: what if we put it together in a document and put it on the
airflow website under
https://airflow.apache.org/community/ where we mention "how we release"?
Might be a bit too much given the context people will have while
visiting the airflow website..
Thanks & Regard
+1 non binding
Installed the RC with helm charts, tried a couple of installation
configurations
and ran a few examples, not seeing any regression.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 12:16 AM Jed Cunningham
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Checked signatures, checks
d shorter, while it gained only the "super
>> important" information IMHO. So yeah having a separate FAQ taking my mail
>> as context might be a good idea.
>>
>> I will open PR for that and if others agree it's a good idea (and help
>> with reviewing it,
+1 non binding
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 11:04 PM Oliveira, Niko
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> From: Wei Lee
> Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2024 5:24:54 PM
> To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [COURRIEL EXTERNE] [VOTE] Accept AIP-60 (Standard
> URI re
e and dedication of the author)
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 3:21 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Heck, why not. I will shamelessly vote on my #36537. While it took just a
> few weeks to merge, It leapfrogged our legacy packaging setup to
> more-or-less bleeding
+1 non binding
Tested some example dags in CNCF provider and Hive Provider. Looks good!
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 8:44 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> +1 (binding) - tested my changes, checked binary reproducibility, licences,
> signatures, checksums - all
+1 non binding
No regressions from the last rc.
On Sat, 27 Jan 2024 at 2:02 PM, Elad Kalif wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 2:08 AM Hussein Awala wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding) I did the same tests and checks as for the first RC.
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 5:28 PM Jarek Poti
This is great, @Briana Okyere
Thank you for bringing this up.
Reviewed the document and left a few comments
On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 12:36 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> I think the best would be where there is a committee to discuss and decide
> (usually), but the people who are in the committee are
with this overall and my vote will be a +1
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 7:56 PM Aritra Basu
wrote:
> I personally haven't had too much friction due to the change and it has
> helped me keep track of any comments people have made. I remain +1 to the
+1 binding
Good work on the proposal, Niko.
The most important part of this vote for me is the scoping you have done.
Great work on that!
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 12:12 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> +1 (binding) . I think we know the scope (more importantly
action.
(Might be an overkill, but thinking out loud here)
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 2:55 AM Briana Okyere
wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> I'm breaking this out into another conversation because I think it warrants
> its own decision before we move forw
rsion they upgrade to.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Sun, Feb 4, 2024 at 5:58 AM Xiaodong (XD) DENG
wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> Many thanks for the feedback.
>
> I fully agree on the potential performance impact if the custom dependency
> is not written in the ideal way, an
+1 from me too based on my earlier points.
Wondering if we can make it a little more rigid to address the concerns
about hiding comments
from the email thread earlier
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 7:47 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have been d
1 - 100 of 431 matches
Mail list logo
