#46942 given how good it feels to see that much code deleted.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 7:04 AM Rahul Vats wrote:
> +1 for https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/46939
>
> Regards,
> Rahul Vats
>
>
>
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 at 15:26, Pierre Jeambrun
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for https://github.com/apache/a
On 2025/02/26 12:38:02 Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Yeah . `apache/gremlin" seems like a better option then. Does anyone have
> anything against it?
In the interest of ASF trademarks, I would suggest it be called
"apache/tinkerpop" with "Gremlin" naming reserved for operators and the like,
as it is
> In the interest of ASF trademarks, I would suggest it be called
"apache/tinkerpop" with "Gremlin" naming reserved for operators and the
like, as it is now with GremlinOperator. I think this makes sense because
it is connecting to TinkerPop-enabled systems via Gremlin. I would
similarly suggest th
Cool. I will let Ahmad comment, but I think we found the **someone** who
will help in case there are some future issues with the Tinkerpop/Gremlin
provider.
While I like Gremlin better (it's just a cool name and I like the logo,
tinkerpop has a cool logo as well https://tinkerpop.apache.org/index.h
I did look into the naming and I thought that it would need to be discussed
at some point before the lazy consensus stage after the dev work is done
but I guess I was wrong :)
I read through some docs regarding the naming and I kept thinking that
Apache Gremlin might not be right, so I decided to
+1 for https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/46942
--
Regards,
Vishnu Chilukoori
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 6:15 AM Pavankumar Gopidesu
wrote:
> +1 #46942
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 2:06 PM Ryan Hamilton
> wrote:
>
> > #46942 given how good it feels to see that much code deleted.
> >
> > On Wed
+1 #46942
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 2:06 PM Ryan Hamilton
wrote:
> #46942 given how good it feels to see that much code deleted.
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 7:04 AM Rahul Vats wrote:
>
> > +1 for https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/46939
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rahul Vats
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed,
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 12:57 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> > In the interest of ASF trademarks, I would suggest it be called
> "apache/tinkerpop" with "Gremlin" naming reserved for operators and the
> like, as it is now with GremlinOperator. I think this makes sense because
> it is connecting to Tink
Kaxil reviewed and merged it this morning, so I guess we'll see if that did it
or not.
- ferruzzi
From: Amogh Desai
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2025 10:11 PM
To: dev@airflow.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EXT] [DISCUSS] Proposal to enhance the PR template
CAUTION:
Hello here,
There was - apparently - one outstanding issue in the new provider
structure - VSCode had trouble with recognising imports for cross-provider
imports - because apparently it did not recognise implicit - also called
native - packages (i.e. folders without __init__.py). We tested it with
Hello,
Apache Airflow Providers prepared on January 26, 2025 have been accepted.
3 "+1" binding votes received:
- Elad Kalif
- Jens Scheffler
- Jarek Potiuk
2 "+1" non-binding votes received:
- Amogh Desai
- Niko Oliveira
Vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/05og5mkh44cdpy1tsxlooz2jyvk
And I just merged Mikahil's VSCODe update: [4] (cool!). You can read vscode
quick-start in [5]
[4] https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/47096
[5]
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/quick-start-ide/contributors_quick_start_vscode.rst
J.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 11:47
+1 for https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/46939
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 6:01 AM Amogh Desai
wrote:
> +1 for https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/46942 :D
> Thanks & Regards,
> Amogh Desai
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 8:36 AM Ankit Chaurasia
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for 46942, if it gets merged.
Dear Airflow community,
I'm happy to announce that new versions of Airflow Providers packages
prepared on February 21, 2025 were just released. Full list of PyPI
packages released is added at the end of the message.
The source release, as well as the binary releases, are available here:
https://
+1 for https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/46939
Regards,
Rahul Vats
On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 at 15:26, Pierre Jeambrun wrote:
> +1 for https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/46939
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 6:01 AM Amogh Desai
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/4694
I pushed changes to move the provider into the “apache” directory. After
updating the class references across the project, I re-tested and all tests
passed.
Regarding the use of Gremlin (or another graph query language like Cypher
and SPARQL) for a common package approach, here are my thoughts on
Yeah . `apache/gremlin" seems like a better option then. Does anyone have
anything against it? I think we are pretty happy with accepting "other
apache" projects as providers, so I see no issue with Gremlin - knowing
that we can always reach out to our friendly Apache Community in case of
any issue
I was thinking integration testing might be something to consider for
testing this provider, I will have a read through the link and implement
that. Thanks Jarek
Farhan
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 12:40 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Yeah . `apache/gremlin" seems like a better option then. Does anyone ha
fascinating - i was just visiting the list to discuss this very topic
having just got started building the very same provider. :)
Ahmad, thanks for your work jere. It's about inline with what I was
planning.
A bit about me, I'm one of the earliest contributors to TinkerPop, a
current committer an
19 matches
Mail list logo
