[VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 10, 2024

2024-10-13 Thread Hussein Awala
+1 (binding) checked signatures, checksums and licences. On Sunday, October 13, 2024, Vishnu Chilukoori wrote: > +1 Non binding > > -- > Regards, > Vishnu C. > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2024, 05:00 Pavankumar Gopidesu > wrote: > > > +1 non binding, tested my changes on a few dag examples, everything lo

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 10, 2024

2024-10-12 Thread Vishnu Chilukoori
+1 Non binding -- Regards, Vishnu C. On Sat, Oct 12, 2024, 05:00 Pavankumar Gopidesu wrote: > +1 non binding, tested my changes on a few dag examples, everything looks > good! > > Regards, > Pavan Kumar > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 4:43 AM Kaxil Naik wrote: > > > +1 binding on sigs, license & c

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 10, 2024

2024-10-12 Thread Pavankumar Gopidesu
+1 non binding, tested my changes on a few dag examples, everything looks good! Regards, Pavan Kumar On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 4:43 AM Kaxil Naik wrote: > +1 binding on sigs, license & checksums > > On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 at 20:46, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > +1 (binding) - checked reproducibility, c

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 10, 2024

2024-10-11 Thread Kaxil Naik
+1 binding on sigs, license & checksums On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 at 20:46, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 (binding) - checked reproducibility, checksums, signatures, licences. > That also includes sdist packages tests. > > I also used the opportunity to improve our release manager and PMC steps > for repro

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 10, 2024

2024-10-11 Thread Jarek Potiuk
+1 (binding) - checked reproducibility, checksums, signatures, licences. That also includes sdist packages tests. I also used the opportunity to improve our release manager and PMC steps for reproducibility of providers to more selectively exclude Python 3.12 when running reproducibility checks: h

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 10, 2024

2024-10-11 Thread Amogh Desai
+1 non binding Tested my dag set, looks good! Thanks & Regards, Amogh Desai On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 9:03 AM Wei Lee wrote: > +1 (non-binding), tested my changes and a few example dags > > Best, > Wei > > > On Oct 11, 2024, at 5:23 AM, Jens Scheffler > wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) - Checked SV

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 10, 2024

2024-10-10 Thread Wei Lee
+1 (non-binding), tested my changes and a few example dags Best, Wei > On Oct 11, 2024, at 5:23 AM, Jens Scheffler > wrote: > > +1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Check in Docker, Reproducible package build, > Licenses, Signatures > > On 10.10.24 13:15, Freddy Demiane wrote: >> +1 (non-binding) on g

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 10, 2024

2024-10-10 Thread Jens Scheffler
+1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Check in Docker, Reproducible package build, Licenses, Signatures On 10.10.24 13:15, Freddy Demiane wrote: +1 (non-binding) on google providers package On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 3:40 AM Elad Kalif wrote: Hey all, I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packa

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 10, 2024

2024-10-10 Thread Freddy Demiane
+1 (non-binding) on google providers package On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 3:40 AM Elad Kalif wrote: > Hey all, > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is > calling a vote on the release, > which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on October 13, > 202

[VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 10, 2024

2024-10-09 Thread Elad Kalif
Hey all, I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on October 13, 2024 01:35 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received. Consider this my (binding) +1. Airflow Prov