+1 Non binding

--
Regards,
Vishnu C.

On Sat, Oct 12, 2024, 05:00 Pavankumar Gopidesu <gopidesupa...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 non binding, tested my changes on a few dag examples, everything looks
> good!
>
> Regards,
> Pavan Kumar
>
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 4:43 AM Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 binding on sigs, license & checksums
> >
> > On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 at 20:46, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding) - checked reproducibility, checksums, signatures,
> licences.
> > > That also includes sdist packages tests.
> > >
> > > I also used the opportunity to improve our release manager and PMC
> steps
> > > for reproducibility of providers to more selectively exclude Python
> 3.12
> > > when running reproducibility checks:
> > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/42944
> > >
> > > There was a problem raised that Python 3.12 could not be used for
> breeze
> > > (there was a python version check), and the main reason was that
> > > reproducibility check also includes verification of .sdist packages of
> > ours
> > > - and this verification fails for Python 3.12 because Apache Beam still
> > > does not support Python 3.12  (
> > https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/32617
> > > )
> > >
> > > Apparently it was not very clear why Python 3.12 is excluded from
> breeze,
> > > so I am adding this explanation here for those PMC members who follow
> the
> > > most important "release" threads of ours, so that they are aware of it.
> > >
> > > Those PMC members who do not run PMC verification now should be able to
> > use
> > > Python 3.12 to help release manager to verify if providers are ready to
> > > release and gives they +1
> > >
> > > Those PMC members who do not help in this effort, can still use Python
> > 3.12
> > > for their breeze commands.
> > >
> > > I hope that explanation is prominent enough so that I do not have to
> > > explain it additionally,
> > >
> > > J.
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to