Got it! Thanks :)
On 2024/11/22 02:14:29 Wei Lee wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> Yep, I should have explained it better 🤦♂️ What I meant is whether we need
> to raise a warning through Ruff for that breaking change (see "[LAZY
> CONSENSUS] Use Ruff as the official linter to detect Airflow 3
> incomp
Hi Vincent,
Yep, I should have explained it better 🤦♂️ What I meant is whether we need to
raise a warning through Ruff for that breaking change (see "[LAZY CONSENSUS]
Use Ruff as the official linter to detect Airflow 3 incompatibilities in user
code” [1]) and whether I list it correctly. For e
Hi Wei,
Thanks for doing it. Pretty impressive the number of changes we did :) Just one
clarification though (and sorry if it was mentioned somewhere else), what do
you exactly mean by "If
everything looks good, please click the checkbox in". Do you mean if the change
listed is indeed a breakin
Hi all,
I just updated the rules before #44080 in
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/41641. I tried to compile the
rules as thoroughly as possible, but it would be great if folks could take
another look to see if these URLs make sense or if I missed anything. If
everything looks good, please
Hey everyone,
We are currently implementing some breaking changes to the main branch.
I've created this issue to keep track of the items that need to be included
in our migration tool from version 2 to 3. I've provided two examples and
will add more in the upcoming days. It would be great if we co
