** Changed in: jansson (Ubuntu Jammy)
Assignee: Loïc Minier (lool) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: jansson (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to jansso
Suggestions on how to deal with noble and oracular/devel welcome as we
don't yet have Tegra images for these series!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083775
Title:
** Patch added: "ubuntu-meta changes – NB: still have to run ./update once
proposed seed branches have been reviewed and merged"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/2083775/+attachment/5825392/+files/ubuntu-meta_tegra-support.debdiff
** Also affects: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~lool/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu/+merge/474519
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~lool/ubuntu-seeds/+git/platform/+merge/474518
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is
On the topic of which packages to pull for WiFi support in our images,
I've checked seeds and images for jammy; Raspi defines all packages in
seeds alone; in the foundational platform seeds, we have:
- netplan.io always installed through the minimal seed
- wpasupplicant installed in desktop-common
Just saw a mention of this bug, and I wanted to provide another
datapoint: I recently sponsored a SRU for an irqbalance bugfix (LP
#2038300), it was for an edge server platform (NVIDIA IGX Orin). What I
noticed was that the code was inherently racy and hard to validate with
unit tests because it's
Hmmm not sure it is related to xorg though, I explicitly removed that as
it might be a kernel issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2006042
Title:
Laptop often freezes af
Thanks for the review Robie!
Agreed that verification makes sense with a program built against both
libraries before and after this fix
Why backport 2.14 rather than cherry-pick the corresponding change? It would be
feasible to cherry-pick just the change to add symbol versioning (you can see
i
@Timo/SRU team: I think the debdiff you're seeing is between kinetic and
jammy, and since it's essential a backport, it would indeed be trivially
small.
The debdiff between latest jammy and this SRU corresponds to the new
upstream release, and that's the part I've carefully reviewed with Hon
Ming
** Changed in: jansson (Ubuntu Jammy)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Loïc Minier (lool)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to jansson in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1987678
Title:
Backport jansson 2.14 to ja
** Changed in: jansson (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: jansson (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Incomplete => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to jansson in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
packaging side bumping the generated dependencies
– +1, uploaded to -proposed (waiting for SRU team to review)
** Changed in: jansson (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Loïc Minier (lool)
** Changed in: jansson (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notifi
Please attach the reproducing pipeline; it's a bit tricky to organise
access to Jetson hardware to the right people, so if you had a
reproducer that we could run without Jetson hardware, that would be
best!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which
Hi Kunal,
It might be tricky to organise testing on Jetson platforms for people that will
prepare the fix.
In any case, could you share instructions to reproduce? If there's a way
to craft a test pipeline that trigger the issue without Jetson hardware,
that would be best.
--
You received this b
This patch landed upstream in 1.17.90, marking only bionic and focal as
possibly affected
** Also affects: gstreamer1.0 (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: gstreamer1.0 (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: gstreamer1.0
Would you be able to share a reproducing pipeline? ideally that can be
run on vanilla Ubuntu rather than on specific hardware or with Nvidia
added plugins
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gstreamer1.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bug
** Also affects: gstreamer1.0 (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: gstreamer1.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gstreamer1.0 in Ubuntu.
http
The mentioned upstream patch was included in the 1.15.2 release and
jammy and focal are unaffected; bionic does not have this patch in
1.14.5-0ubuntu1~18.04.3
** Package changed: gstreamer1.0 (Ubuntu) => gst-plugins-base1.0
(Ubuntu)
** Also affects: gst-plugins-base1.0 (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importan
Hi Kunal,
thanks for your report; I looked at the upstream bug, and I didn't find
a reproducer to confirm the bug and its resolution with the patch; would
you have one?
This might be a candidate for a SRU update; the process is outlined in
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates and is large
I got it. See it attached.
** Attachment added: "faulty file"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/1849542/+attachment/5299645/+files/global-messages-db.sqlite
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to thu
Just deleted global-messages-db.sqlite and now it looks like it works
fine. I hopê I didn't loose anything.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849542
Title:
Thunderbi
Public bug reported:
HELP
Just performed an upgrade from Ubuntu 19.04 to 19.10. Launched
Thunderbird and the interface is empty. No emails, no folders, no
calendar, I can't even open the "account settings" window.
This is a complete disaster. I need thunderbird for my work.
If I launch TB f
Public bug reported:
Can't seem to get system to use nvidia driver instead of Nouveau
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu7.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-43.46-lowlatency 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-43-lowlatency x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_mod
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 18.04 LTS
Nautilus package: 1:3.26.3-0ubuntu4
I don't get thumbnail previews in Files (Nautilus) at the default zoom
level when using List view.
If I select 150% in the hamburger menu the thumbnails are displayed, and
they are displayed in Grid view at all sizes. They
See also https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-
workspace/+bug/1684240
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1677540
Title:
corrupted mouse pointer icon
Statu
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 16.04 packages libxml2 version 2.9.3*, which contains a
regression documented here:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/libxml2/commit/?id=4f8606c13cb7f2684839f850b83de5ce647d3ca7
Full release notes of 2.9.4 can be seen here:
http://xmlsoft.org/news.html
The bug will affect
Not related to the assertion but I got a Netbook with such a chip and it
was easily falling back to slow GPU/driver pathes. I remember for
instance transcendental functions in pixel shaders (sin, cos, etc)
taking ~1 sec to complete. So we could be hitting such an issue. Last
time I checked QtQuick
Since I've upgrade the intel HD stuff with Oibaf PPA
(https://launchpad.net/~oibaf/+archive/ubuntu/graphics-drivers),
everything is OK for me now. I know it's not a clean solution, but I
needed it urgently.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which
** Changed in: location-service
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: location-service (Ubuntu RTM)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
(there are some binaries for rtm in silo 7)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1394204
Title:
dbus daemon spinning with NM AP properties change event
Status in th
I've prepared some test binaries with the proposed fix at
http://people.canonical.com/~lool/lp-1394204/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1394204
Title:
dbus daem
Public bug reported:
With Linux update 3.16.0-21-generic.
Thanks
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10
Package: nvidia-331 331.89-0ubuntu5
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-20.27-generic 3.16.3
Uname: Linux 3.16.0-20-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.14.7-
This hits other users of dbus-cpp API; e.g.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/espoo/+bug/1368247
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to dbus-cpp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1358918
Title:
ubuntu-location-serviced cpu u
This broke autopkgtests of some packages; see bug #1374131.
This is likely to be removed from utopic-proposed for now to allow other
packages to keep transitioning to utopic.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu
** Also affects: unity8 (Ubuntu-rtm 14.09)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1365095
Title:
Greeter not asking for pin code in
** Also affects: unity8 (Ubuntu RTM)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1365095
Title:
Greeter not asking for pin code in image
Same issue: having flgrx working nicely with an xorg.conf generated by
aticontrol... but removed at each reboot and ending in "Xorg not able to
autodetect your screen. Please configure it manually".
@Alberto: Please ask if more information required (logs, etc)
--
You received this bug notificati
Still an issue with Firefox 30.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84242
Title:
Firefox address bar search displays proxy error page for single word
queries
Status in T
Still an issue with Firefox 30.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84242
Title:
Firefox address bar search displays proxy error page for single word
queries
Status in T
** Changed in: ubuntu-sounds (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-sounds in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1239594
Title:
New startup sound for 13.10 desktop
Status in
Sorry, didn't understand last comment: what is outside the bounds? the
whole request or the part about startup command / .desktop changes?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-sounds in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Doesn't happen with --temp-profile.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1223251
Title:
recent saucy update lost its chrome
Status in “chromium-browser” package in
I am experiencing this bug since I upgraded to raring.
I don't have, and I can't install any package named telepathy-glib (as
indicated in the previous comment)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to telepathy-glib in Ubuntu.
ht
Still an issue for me. Very annoying indeed.
Hope you guys will find a way to fix it :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501519
Title:
ubuntuone-client-gnome prevents n
I can also confirm that the kernel from comment #11 (3.8.0-13-generic
3.8.0-13.23~lp1156548v1) fixes it for me on raring with Intel Graphics
Media Accelerator 4500MHD; xrandr output now correct and unconfused fb0,
lightdm and desktop.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
As mentioned on IRC, kernel from comment #7 fixes it for me on raring
with Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 4500MHD; xrandr output now correct
and unconfused fb0, lightdm and desktop.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libxra
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Kernel Team (ubuntu-kernel-team)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is s
** Attachment added: "Raw crash file"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upower/+bug/1109048/+attachment/3506176/+files/_usr_lib_upower_upowerd.0.crash
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to upower in Ubuntu.
https://b
Public bug reported:
Crashed upower by running sudo pm-suspend from ssh on a nexus 7.
ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04
Package: upower 0.9.19-1ubuntu1
Uname: Linux 3.1.10-9-nexus7 armv7l
ApportVersion: 2.8-0ubuntu2
Architecture: armhf
Date: Tue Jan 29 16:43:50 2013
ExecutablePath: /
Quickly grep-ed shadow (login) and gnome-screensaver, and these don't
seem to use mlock at all?!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1074279
Title:
lightdm uses ~30 Mb of R
(just to convince myself that session-child can't see uncleared memory
from before the exec())
** Attachment added: "main.c"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1074279/+attachment/3498033/+files/main.c
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desk
There are two sides doing locking: lightdm itself, and the individual
greeters.
Greeters might typically use fancy UI libraries like Gtk+, Qt etc.,
where it will be hard to clear all password bits; e.g. text input might
be passed around multiple layers.
Lightdm will typically pass messages to PAM
local administrators group. You can
provide more than one group if you need to.
Check out that your LDAP client and nsswitch can resolve this group and
all accounts within (getent group).
Hope this helps ;)
Loïc
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, whi
Hi,
This is normal the patch is not working with further versions of
policykit as the source code has changed and the patched lines are not
at the same offset anymore.
Here is an updated version of my patch adapted to the version 0.104 of
policykit.
** Patch added: "Anti-rights revocation patch
Hi, same "problem" for me, using latest Ubuntu distro (12.10) and latest
gnome-terminal in repos (3.6.0).
This feature would be very useful, I also have to install all KDE/Qt
Konsole's dependencies for only one entry in a menu.
So, same question: Would it be possible to add this feature to gnome-
** Description changed:
I upgraded from 12.04 to 12.10 and at first boot, I had a "running in low
graphics mode" message and unity displaying without panel and dock.
After searching on internet I found that uninstalling the fglrx package the
display was fine.
- This is may graphic card :
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 12.10
Empathy 3.6.0.3
Contact photos icons are too big, they were smaller in ubuntu 12.04. Now
the contact list is 3km long, I have to scroll a lot to look for
someone.
** Affects: empathy (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this
Public bug reported:
I upgraded from 12.04 to 12.10 and at first boot, I had a "running in low
graphics mode" message and unity displaying without panel and dock.
After searching on internet I found that uninstalling the fglrx package the
display was fine.
This is may graphic card :
01:00.0 VGA
Public bug reported:
The new scroll system makes very very very difficult the resizing of the
left & right columns in nautilus.
Description:Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS
Release:12.04
nautilus:
Installé : 1:3.4.2-0ubuntu4
Each time I approach the mouse to the separation between left and right
I have the same bug whith NVIDIA [GeForce GTS 450] on ubuntu 12.04
Here is my lightdm.log : http://paste.ubuntu.com/624/
I use Nvidia Twinview with two samsung screens, the artifacts appear on the top
left of my left screen.
I've got a black screen after the first log and it works nice after
The companies we need to test each new software version, to be on their
internal website (Intranet) can still function. With the ESR he will
have to check once a year.
imagine the work that represent test versions every 6 weeks, especially
if you have to modify the internal sites and the costs for
Public bug reported:
Hi,
The version of firefox in Ubuntu 12.04 LTS is not the ESR:
http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/
This can cause problems for deploying in enterprise.
It is preferable that the LTS version of ubuntu uses firefox versions of ESR to
avoid problems of deployme
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947426
Title:
The version of firefox in Ubuntu 12.04 LTS is not the ESR.
Status in “firefox” package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915271 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 915271
package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: rmdir:
failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/': Directory not emp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915271 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 916176
package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
** This bug has b
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915271 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 916176
package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
** This bug has b
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915271 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 916176
package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
** This bug has b
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915271 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 916176
package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
** This bug has b
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915271 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 916176
package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
** This bug has b
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915271 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 916176
package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
** This bug has b
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915271 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 916176
package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
** This bug has b
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915271 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 916176
package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
** This bug has b
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915271 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 916176
package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
** This bug has b
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915271 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 916176
package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
** This bug has b
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915271 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 916176
package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
** This bug has b
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915271 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 916176
package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
** This bug has b
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915271 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 916176
package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
** This bug has b
After unpacking the .deb and changing:
if [ "$1" = "upgrade" -o "$1" = "install" ]; then
rm -f `echo /usr/lib/libreoffice | sed -e
s,usr/,/var,g`/basis3.4/program/services.rdb
rmdir `echo /usr/lib/libreoffice | sed -e
s,usr/,/var,g`/basis3.4/program/
to:
if [ "$1" = "upgrade" -o "
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 916176 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916176
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 916176
package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
--
You recei
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 916176 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916176
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 916176
package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
--
You recei
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 916176 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916176
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 916176
package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
--
You recei
libreoffice-core fails to upgrade unless you run your package manager
from / because its preinst uses relative pathnames to delete an old
directory.
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Pack
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 916176 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916176
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 916176
package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
--
You recei
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 916176 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916176
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 916176
package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
--
You recei
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 916176 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916176
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 916176
package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
--
You recei
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 916176 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916176
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 916176
package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
--
You recei
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 916176 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916176
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 916176
package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
--
You recei
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 916176 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916176
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 916176
package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
--
You recei
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 916176 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916176
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 916176
package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
--
You recei
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 916176 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916176
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 916176
package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
--
You recei
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 916176 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916176
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 916176
package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
--
You recei
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 916176 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916176
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 916176
package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
--
You recei
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 914623 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914623
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 914623
package rhythmbox-plugins 2.90.1~2026.89c872b0-0ubuntu3 failed to
install/upgrade: trying to overwrite
'/usr/share/rhythmbox/plugins/artdisplay/rh
** Also affects: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu Precise)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-12.04-beta-1
** Changed in: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
** Changed in: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Loïc Minier (lool)
** Changed in: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
Cache issue, sorry for the noise
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/855747
Title:
Firefox breaks oddly with
Public bug reported:
Hi
The presumably simple redirect generated by:
https://wiki.linaro.org/FirefoxBug
seems to break Firefox, but wget and Chromium work fine.
Others have confirmed the redirect issue with oneiric's Firefox.
Firefox says "Firefox ne peut trouver le serveur à l'adresse process.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/855747
Title:
Firefox breaks oddly with a redirect
Status in “firefox” package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
Hi
The presumably
98 matches
Mail list logo