This is not an issue anymore for me since I upgraded to Jaunty, but it
has been an issue until the last day I had been using Intrepid. Now I
haven't Intrepid anymore on any of my computers, so I don't know if it
is still a issue for it.
As a side note (e.g. "rant") Intrepid support will end in 8 m
Talk about zombies! This report is so old I couldn't even realize I was
the one who created it in the first place, until I read that information
above the comments.
I've now took the time to read all the comments again.
@Chris Billington: I really don't know what kind of drugs I was on when
I wro
I'm experiencing this bug again in 9.10, although the UI control is
gone, the respective gconf key does not work either:
/apps/gdm/simple-greater/settings-manager/sound/active
I've unchecked the box for that key, but Ubuntu still plays the greater
sound after graphical login (gdm configured with
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nautilus
I'd like to have an option to see the files and directories in
alphabetical order in nautilus. For example, if I have the following
directories:
20050501
200607
200901
the 'ls' command lists them in alphabetical order, just like above, but
naut
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22078942/Dependencies.txt
--
sort order of files listings in nautilus is not alphabetical
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326582
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is s
Well, since "years ago" things could change a bit if needed...
However I'm not asking for a fix, but I'm asking for an option to be
added in the preferences panel. I'd have rated this bug as "whishlist"
if I could.
Anyway, I personally know at least two people except me who do not
expect this beh
I've just tried konqueror: version 3.5/debian uses alphabetical order,
version 4.1.4/intrepid (but not on kubuntu) behaves the same as
nautilus. I've no other versions to try. However I don't believe that
the behavior of any other piece of software, be it konqueror or others,
should be a reference
So I've headed bugzilla.gnome.org, and guess what?
"
Have a problem?
1. Create an account
"
Damn, I already have an account on Launchpad, I've already filed the
bug, but I have to create another account just to copy and paste my wish
onto bugzilla, because Ubuntu Desktop maintainers refuse t
@Sebastian:
"normal users" are not "stupid users", with few exceptions :)
"normal users" learn the alphabetical order at 6 y/o when they go to school,
it's not that hard to understand...
"normal users" would certainly use such an option, just like they use other
much less useful options for them,
> how would you call this option to be understandable though?
"Sorting" for example, followed by a list choice, including "Default" (the
current one), "Alphabetical" and eventually others. I'm not native english
speaker, nevertheless I find that quite understandable.
> they also learn that 11 is
> what an useful behaviour to have, why should other people send your
request to GNOME if they think they are wrong?
Because they are the maintainers.
I'm not asking for a lawyer to defend my interests, I'm suggesting a maintainer
could file the bug upstream because maintainers are already regist
Public bug reported:
This report comes from the discussion at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/326582, in
particular from the Sebastien Bacher post:
>that's a good point and maybe that should not be an option, feel free
to open a bug to discuss that if you want
Here I list
> And I can tell you I don't want to pollute the preferences with options
> confusing and unneeded by most people.
You all have made me change my mind, and now I agree with you all on that issue:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/meta-gnome2/+bug/326638
> However, you're trolling. It has
Last words I tell about this issue:
I should have tried to search this feature request on b.g.o before, but
now that I've searched, I can tell it's simply false that no one is
asking for it:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547350
In particular see comment #4.
Do you still believe no o
I reply here only to the technical observations (assuming I'm the troll,
I avoid feeding myself...).
> the right way in my opinion to have it is by adding a new gconf key retaining
> current sorting behaviour by default, but
> *not* adding a new UI element in the nautilus preferences dialog.
Tha
Public bug reported:
Gnome plays the access sound during access even if the corresponding
option is disabled in Sound Preferences.
I disabled the access sound when my system was 8.04. When I upgraded to
8.10 it started to play it even if the setting has not changed and it's
still disabled.
The s
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
sort order of files listings in nautilus is not alphabetical
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326582
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nautilus
My server (Debian Lenny) shares a folder via samba. My Client (Ubuntu
Jaunty) mounts the folder.
Right clicking any subfolder in the samba share and looking at the
properties, I get a disk usage amount very different from the correct
amount (I a
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31781510/Dependencies.txt
--
nautilus shows incorrect disk usage in samba shares
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429364
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed
19 matches
Mail list logo
